/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 In recent years, a growing array... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In recent years, a growing array of entertainment options competes for consumer time. By 2004 cable television and radio surpassed broadcast television, recorded music, and the daily newspaper to become the two entertainment media with the greatest usage (The Wall Street Journal, January 26,2004 ). Researchers used a sample of 15 individuals and collected data on the hours per week spent watching cable television and hours per week spent listening to the radio. \(\begin{array}{ccccc}\text { Individual } & \text { Television } & \text { Radio } & \text { Individual } & \text { Television } & \text { Radio } \\ 1 & 22 & 25 & 9 & 21 & 21 \\ 2 & 8 & 10 & 10 & 23 & 23 \\\ 3 & 25 & 29 & 11 & 14 & 15 \\ 4 & 22 & 19 & 12 & 14 & 18 \\ 5 & 12 & 13 & 13 & 14 & 17 \\ 6 & 26 & 28 & 14 & 16 & 15 \\ 7 & 22 & 23 & 15 & 24 & 23 \\\ 8 & 19 & 21 & & \end{array}\) a. Use a .05 level of significance and test for a difference between the population mean usage for cable television and radio. What is the \(p\) -value? b. What is the sample mean number of hours per week spent watching cable television? What is the sample mean number of hours per week spent listening to radio? Which medium has the greater usage?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Mean watching TV is 18.93 hours, mean radio listening is 19.87 hours. Radio has greater usage. No significant difference in means (p-value = 0.702).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Sample Means

First, find the sample mean for both cable television and radio. Add all the hours spent watching television and divide by the number of individuals (15). Do the same for radio.For cable television: \\[\bar{X}_{TV} = \frac{22 + 8 + 25 + 22 + 12 + 26 + 22 + 19 + 21 + 23 + 14 + 14 + 14 + 16 + 24}{15} = 18.93\ \]For radio:\[\bar{X}_{Radio} = \frac{25 + 10 + 29 + 19 + 13 + 28 + 23 + 21 + 21 + 23 + 15 + 18 + 17 + 15 + 23}{15} = 19.87\]
02

Calculate Sample Variances

Next, calculate the sample variance for both groups. Variance measures how much the data points differ from the mean.For cable television:\[S^2_{TV} = \frac{\sum (X_i - \bar{X}_{TV})^2}{n-1} = \frac{\sum (X_i - 18.93)^2}{14} = 33.38\]For radio:\[S^2_{Radio} = \frac{\sum (X_i - \bar{X}_{Radio})^2}{n-1} = \frac{\sum (X_i - 19.87)^2}{14} = 42.84\]
03

Conduct t-test for Mean Difference

Determine if there is a significant difference between the means using a two-sample t-test. The null hypothesis is that the means are equal versus the alternative hypothesis that they are not equal.Calculate the test statistic:\[t = \frac{\bar{X}_{TV} - \bar{X}_{Radio}}{\sqrt{\frac{S^2_{TV}}{n} + \frac{S^2_{Radio}}{n}}} = \frac{18.93 - 19.87}{\sqrt{\frac{33.38}{15} + \frac{42.84}{15}}} = -0.39\]With 28 degrees of freedom, find the critical t-value and compare it to the calculated t-value. Also, find the p-value.
04

Compare p-value to Significance Level

The p-value is determined from the t-distribution table based on the calculated t-statistic and degrees of freedom. With a t-value of -0.39 and a 0.05 significance level, the p-value is approximately 0.702, which is greater than 0.05. Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, we do not reject the null hypothesis, indicating no significant difference in mean usage.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Mean
The sample mean is a measure of the central tendency of a dataset. It is calculated by summing all individual data points and dividing by the total number of data points in the sample. This value gives us an idea of what a typical data point looks like. In the exercise, researchers calculated the sample mean for both cable television and radio usage.
  • For cable television, the sample mean was calculated as \( \bar{X}_{TV} = 18.93 \).
  • For radio, it was \( \bar{X}_{Radio} = 19.87 \).
This tells us that, on average, participants tend to spend slightly more time listening to the radio than watching cable television during the week.By looking at these averages, researchers can better understand media consumption patterns in the sample.
Sample Variance
Sample variance is a measure of the spread or dispersion of a set of data points in relation to the sample mean. It indicates how much the individual data points differ from the sample mean, which is crucial for understanding variability.To compute the sample variance, we subtract the sample mean from each data point, square each result, and then average these squared differences. The sample variance for:
  • Cable television usage was calculated as \( S^2_{TV} = 33.38 \).
  • Radio usage was \( S^2_{Radio} = 42.84 \).
A higher variance implies that the data points are more spread out from the mean, indicating more variability. In this case, radio usage displays a higher variance compared to cable television. This suggests there is more inconsistency in the number of hours individuals spend listening to the radio weekly compared to watching cable TV.
T-test
The T-test is a statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two groups. In this exercise, a two-sample T-test was used to compare the mean weekly usage of cable television and radio.
  • The null hypothesis (H_0) states there is no difference between the population means for cable television and radio.
  • The alternative hypothesis (H_1) proposes that there is a difference.
To perform the T-test, we use the formula:\[t = \frac{\bar{X}_{TV} - \bar{X}_{Radio}}{\sqrt{\frac{S^2_{TV}}{n} + \frac{S^2_{Radio}}{n}}}\]In this case, the calculated t-statistic was \(-0.39\). By comparing this with critical values from the t-distribution, we can evaluate if any observed difference is statistically significant.
P-value
The p-value is vital in hypothesis testing as it helps determine the significance of the results. It indicates the probability of observing the effect of data, assuming the null hypothesis is true. In hypothesis testing, you compare the p-value against a pre-determined significance level (alpha), usually set at 0.05. If the p-value is less than the significance level, you reject the null hypothesis, indicating a statistically significant result. In this exercise:
  • The p-value was found to be approximately 0.702.
  • Since 0.702 > 0.05, we do not reject the null hypothesis, suggesting no significant difference in mean media usage between cable television and radio.
Understanding the p-value gives researchers confidence in their conclusions regarding the observed data and hypothesized relationships.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Periodically, Merrill Lynch customers are asked to evaluate Merrill Lynch financial consultants and services. Higher ratings on the client satisfaction survey indicate better service, with 7 the maximum service rating. Independent samples of service ratings for two financial consultants are summarized here. Consultant A has 10 years of experience, whereas consultant \(\mathrm{B}\) has 1 year of experience. Use \(\alpha=.05\) and test to see whether the consultant with more experience has the higher population mean service rating. Consultant A \(\quad\) Consultant B\\[\begin{array}{ll} n_{1}=16 & n_{2}=10 \\\\\bar{x}_{1}=6.82 & \bar{x}_{2}=6.25 \\\s_{1}=.64 & s_{2}=.75\end{array}\\] a. State the null and alternative hypotheses. b. Compute the value of the test statistic. c. What is the \(p\) -value? d. What is your conclusion?

A study reported in the Journal of Small Business Management concluded that selfemployed individuals do not experience higher job satisfaction than individuals who are not self-employed. In this study, job satisfaction is measured using 18 items, each of which is rated using a Likert-type scale with \(1-5\) response options ranging from strong agreement to strong disagreement. A higher score on this scale indicates a higher degree of job satisfaction. The sum of the ratings for the 18 items, ranging from \(18-90\), is used as the measure of job satisfaction. Suppose that this approach was used to measure the job satisfaction for lawyers, physical therapists, cabinetmakers, and systems analysts. The results obtained for a sample of 10 individuals from each profession follow. At the \(\alpha=.05\) level of significance, test for any difference in the job satisfaction among the four professions.

Money magazine reports percentage returns and expense ratios for stock and bond funds. The following data are the expense ratios for 10 midcap stock funds, 10 small-cap stock funds, 10 hybrid stock funds, and 10 specialty stock funds (Money, March 2003 ). \(\begin{array}{cccc}\text { Midcap } & \text { Small-Cap } & \text { Hybrid } & \text { Specialty } \\ 1.2 & 2.0 & 2.0 & 1.6 \\\ 1.1 & 1.2 & 2.7 & 2.7 \\ 1.0 & 1.7 & 1.8 & 2.6 \\ 1.2 & 1.8 & 1.5 & 2.5 \\\ 1.3 & 1.5 & 2.5 & 1.9 \\ 1.8 & 2.3 & 1.0 & 1.5 \\ 1.4 & 1.9 & 0.9 & 1.6 \\\ 1.4 & 1.3 & 1.9 & 2.7 \\ 1.0 & 1.2 & 1.4 & 2.2 \\ 1.4 & 1.3 & 0.3 & 0.7\end{array}\) Use \(\alpha=.05\) to test for any significant difference in the mean expense ratio among the four types of stock funds.

Commercial real estate prices and rental rates suffered substantial declines in the past year (Newsweek, July 27,2009 ). These declines were particularly severe in Asia; annual lease rates in Tokyo, Hong Kong, and singapore declined by \(40 \%\) or more. Even with such large declines, annual lease rates in Asia were still higher than those in many cities in Europe and the United States. Annual lease rates for a sample of 30 commercial properties in Hong Kong showed an average of \(\$ 1,114\) per square meter with a standard deviation of \(\$ 230\) Annual lease rates for a sample of 40 commercial properties in Paris showed an average lease rate of \(\$ 989\) per square meter with a standard deviation of \(\$ 195\) a. \(\quad\) On the basis of the sample results, can we conclude that the mean annual lease rate is higher in Hong Kong than in Paris? Develop appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. b. Use \(\alpha=.01 .\) What is your conclusion? Are rental rates higher in Hong Kong?

Consider the following data for two independent random samples taken from two normal populations. $$\begin{array}{l|rrrrrr} \text { Sample 1 } & 10 & 7 & 13 & 7 & 9 & 8 \\\\\hline \text { Sample 2 } & 8 & 7 & 8 & 4 & 6 & 9\end{array}$$ a. Compute the two sample means. b. Compute the two sample standard deviations. c. What is the point estimate of the difference between the two population means? d. What is the \(90 \%\) confidence interval estimate of the difference between the two population means?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.