/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Construct a scatterplot, and fin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient \(r\). Also find the P-value or the critical values of \(r\) from Table \(A-5 .\) Use a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05 .\) Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section \(10-2\) exercises.) Listed below are annual data for various years. The data are weights (metric tons) of lemons imported from Mexico and U.S. car crash fatality rates per 100,000 population [based on data from "The Trouble with QSAR (or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Embrace Fallacy)," by Stephen Johnson, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Vol. 48, No. 1]. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between weights of lemon imports from Mexico and U.S. car fatality rates? Do the results suggest that imported lemons cause car fatalities? $$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Lemon Imports } & 230 & 265 & 358 & 480 & 530 \\ \hline \text { Crash Fatality Rate } & 15.9 & 15.7 & 15.4 & 15.3 & 14.9 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
There is a significant linear correlation (\( r = -0.99 \)). However, correlation does not imply causation, so lemon imports do not cause car fatalities.

Step by step solution

01

Create a scatterplot

Plot the lemon imports (in metric tons) on the x-axis and the crash fatality rates on the y-axis. For this, plot the pairs (230, 15.9), (265, 15.7), (358, 15.4), (480, 15.3), and (530, 14.9).
02

Calculate the linear correlation coefficient (r)

Use the formula for the linear correlation coefficient:\[ r = \frac{n(\sum xy) - (\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n(\sum x^2) - (\sum x)^2][n(\sum y^2) - (\sum y)^2]}} \]Compute the necessary summations: \(\sum x\), \(\sum y\), \(\sum xy\), \(\sum x^2\), \(\sum y^2\) and substitute into the formula. Here, \(n=5\).
03

Step 2.1: Compute the necessary sums

\[\sum x = 230 + 265 + 358 + 480 + 530 = 1863\]\[\sum y = 15.9 + 15.7 + 15.4 + 15.3 + 14.9 = 77.2\]\[\sum xy = (230 \cdot 15.9) + (265 \cdot 15.7) + (358 \cdot 15.4) + (480 \cdot 15.3) + (530 \cdot 14.9) = 3661.2 + 4160.5 + 5513.2 + 7344 + 7897 = 28576.9\]\[\sum x^2 = 230^2 + 265^2 + 358^2 + 480^2 + 530^2 = 52900 + 70225 + 128164 + 230400 + 280900 = 762589\]\[\sum y^2 = 15.9^2 + 15.7^2 + 15.4^2 + 15.3^2 + 14.9^2 = 252.81 + 246.49 + 237.16 + 234.09 + 222.01 = 1192.56\]
04

Step 2.2: Substitute into the formula

\[ r = \frac{5 \times 28576.9 - 1863 \times 77.2}{\sqrt{[5 \times 762589 - 1863^2][5 \times 1192.56 - 77.2^2]}} \]First, simplify the terms inside the square root:\[ 5 \times 762589 = 3812945\]\[ 1863^2 = 3471969\]\[ 5 \times 1192.56 = 5962.8\]\[ 77.2^2 = 5959.84\]Then, compute:\[ r = \frac{5 \times 28576.9 - 1863 \times 77.2}{\sqrt{(3812945 - 3471969) (5962.8 - 5959.84)}} = \frac{142884.5 - 143877.6}{\sqrt{340976 \times 2.96}} = \frac{-993.1}{999.979} = -0.99 \]
05

Find the critical values from Table A-5

With \(\alpha = 0.05\) and degrees of freedom \( df = n - 2 = 5 - 2 = 3 \), the table value for \( r \) at a 0.05 significance level is \( \pm 0.878 \).
06

Compare the correlation coefficient with the critical values

Since the absolute value of the calculated \( r = -0.99 \) is greater than the critical value 0.878, this indicates significant linear correlation.
07

Draw conclusions

The evidence supports a linear correlation between lemon imports and car fatality rates. However, correlation does not imply causation, so it cannot be concluded that lemon imports cause car fatalities.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

scatterplot
A scatterplot is a graph used to display and compare data with two variables. Each point in the scatterplot represents a pair of values (x, y), showing how one variable relates to the other. To construct a scatterplot:
1. Plot the independent variable (like lemon imports) on the x-axis.
2. Plot the dependent variable (like car crash fatality rates) on the y-axis.
3. Each pair of values (e.g., (230, 15.9)) corresponds to a point on the graph.
By examining the scatterplot, you can get a sense of the relationship between the two variables. For instance, you'll observe the trend of whether higher lemon imports seem to coincide with higher, lower, or stable car crash fatality rates.
linear correlation coefficient
The linear correlation coefficient, often denoted as 'r', measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables.

Values of 'r' range between -1 and 1:
1. If r = 1, there is a perfect positive linear correlation.
2. If r = -1, there is a perfect negative linear correlation.
3. If r = 0, there is no linear correlation.

The formula for 'r' is:
P-value
In statistical hypothesis testing, the P-value helps determine the significance of results. It's the probability of observing results as extreme as, or more extreme than, the ones observed, under the assumption the null hypothesis is true.
A low P-value (< 0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting the observed data is unlikely to have occurred by random chance.
significance level
The significance level, represented by α (alpha), is the threshold set by researchers to determine whether the null hypothesis should be rejected. Common significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10. In this case, α = 0.05:
1. If the P-value < α, reject the null hypothesis.
2. If the P-value ≥ α, do not reject the null hypothesis.

Using this framework helps ensure that conclusions drawn from data analysis are statistically justified.
causation vs correlation
Understanding the difference between causation and correlation is crucial.

Correlation means there is a relationship between two variables, but it doesn't answer whether one variable causes the other to change. For instance, lemon imports and car fatality rates could be correlated, but it doesn't mean lemon imports cause car fatalities.

Causation indicates that one event is the result of the occurrence of the other event; for example, smoking causes lung cancer. Establishing causation usually requires controlled experiments and deeper analysis beyond correlation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient \(r\). Also find the P-value or the critical values of \(r\) from Table \(A-5 .\) Use a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05 .\) Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section \(10-2\) exercises.) Listed below are amounts of bills for dinner and the amounts of the tips that were left. The data were collected by students of the author. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between the bill amounts and the tip amounts? If everyone were to tip with the same percentage, what should be the value of \(r\) ? $$\begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline \text { Bill (dollars) } & 33.46 & 50.68 & 87.92 & 98.84 & 63.60 & 107.34 \\ \hline \text { Tip (dollars) } & 5.50 & 5.00 & 8.08 & 17.00 & 12.00 & 16.00 \\\ \hline \end{array}$$

Use the data from Appendix \(B\) to construct a scatterplot, find the value of the linear correlation coefficient \(r\), and find either the P-value or the critical values of \(r\) from Table A-5 using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05 .\) Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.) Use all of the foot lengths and heights of the 19 males from Data Set 2 "Foot and Height" in Appendix \(\mathrm{B}\).

The association between the temperature and the number of times a cricket chirps in 1 min was studied. Listed below are the numbers of chirps in \(1 \mathrm{~min}\) and the corresponding temperatures in degrees Fahrenheit (based on data from The Song of Insects by George W. Pierce, Harvard University Press). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a relationship between the number of chirps in 1 min and the temperature? $$\begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Chirps in } 1 \text { min } & 882 & 1188 & 1104 & 864 & 1200 & 1032 & 960 & 900 \\ \hline \text { Temperature }\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\right) & 69.7 & 93.3 & 84.3 & 76.3 & 88.6 & 82.6 & 71.6 & 79.6 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient \(r\). Also find the P-value or the critical values of \(r\) from Table \(A-5 .\) Use a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05 .\) Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section \(10-2\) exercises.) Listed below are ages of Oscar winners matched by the years in which the awards were won (from Data Set 14 "Oscar Winner Age" in Appendix B). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between the ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors? Should we expect that there would be a correlation? $$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Best Actress } & 28 & 30 & 29 & 61 & 32 & 33 & 45 & 29 & 62 & 22 & 44 & 54 \\ \hline \text { Best Actor } & 43 & 37 & 38 & 45 & 50 & 48 & 60 & 50 & 39 & 55 & 44 & 33 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

If we find that there is a linear correlation between the concentration of carbon dioxide \(\left(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\right)\) in our atmosphere and the global mean temperature, does that indicate that changes in \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) cause changes in the global mean temperature? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.