/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 58 Does a correlation of \(-0.70\) ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Does a correlation of \(-0.70\) or \(+0.50\) give a larger coefficient of determination? We say that the linear relationship that has the larger coefficient of determination is more strongly correlated. Which of the values shows a stronger correlation?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Coefficient of determination for correlation of -0.70 is 0.49 while for +0.50 it is 0.25. Therefore, correlation of -0.70 shows stronger effect or correlation.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the concept of coefficient of determination

Coefficient of determination, often denoted as R², is the square of the correlation coefficient. It measures the proportion of the variance for a dependent variable that's explained by an independent variable or variables in a regression model.
02

Compute the coefficients of determination

To determine which correlation coefficient results in a larger coefficient of determination, take the square of the absolute values of both correlation coefficients (-0.70 and +0.50). Mathematically, they are calculated as \((-0.70)^2\) and \((+0.50)^2\).
03

Compare the coefficients of determination

The results from step 2 represent the respective coefficients of determination. The larger value corresponds to a stronger correlation.
04

Identifying the correlation with stronger effect

After determining these coefficients, identify which one is larger. The correlation that has the larger coefficient of determination would have a stronger effect.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation Coefficient
In statistics, the correlation coefficient, often represented by the symbol \(r\), indicates the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. The values of \(r\) range from -1 to 1. A value of 1 means there's a perfect positive linear relationship, while -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship.
It's essential to grasp that the correlation coefficient alone tells us about the direction and strength, but not necessarily the extent, of the association between variables.
  • If \(r = 0\), it means there is no linear relationship present.
  • Values closer to 1 or -1 show a stronger relationship.
  • A positive \(r\) implies that as one variable increases, so does the other, while a negative \(r\) suggests that as one variable increases, the other decreases.
Identifying the correlation coefficient is only the first step in understanding a relationship's nature. More can be derived when we delve deeper and explore its squares, leading us to the concept of the Coefficient of Determination.
Linear Relationship
A linear relationship between two variables suggests that the rate of change in one variable is constant concerning the other. Such relationships, depicted as straight lines on graphs, are foundational in many analytical processes.
The concept is simple: if you plot the variables on a graph, and they align to form a straight line, they are linearly related.
  • The slope of this line determines the rate at which the variables change in relation to each other.
  • In a perfect linear relationship, all data points will lie exactly on a single line.
  • However, real-world data often just "approximates" a line, indicating linear tendencies.
Understanding whether a relationship is linear is vital for predicting or explaining data trends. This understanding is crucial when determining how much variation in one variable can be "determined" or predicted by another, which ties directly into studying the Variance Explained.
Variance Explained
Variance Explained, often represented as the Coefficient of Determination, or \(R^2\), provides insight into how well data fit a statistical model, commonly a regression model. The value, expressed as a percentage, describes the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable(s).
To compute \(R^2\), simply square the correlation coefficient (\(r\)) of a linear relationship.
  • An \(R^2\) value of 0 means none of the variance is explained by the model.
  • An \(R^2\) value of 1 indicates complete explanatory power from the independent variables over the dependent variable.
  • The closer the \(R^2\) is to 1, the stronger the predictive power of the model.
Returning to our original exercise, we determine which correlation coefficient indicates a stronger correlation by squaring them to find \(R^2\). Hence, a correlation of -0.70, when squared, yields an \(R^2\) of 0.49, while +0.50 results in an \(R^2\) of only 0.25.
This illustrates that even though -0.70 is negative, it exhibits a stronger linear relationship due to its higher \(R^2\) value, explaining more variance than +0.50.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Answer the questions using complete sentences. a. What is an influential point? How should influential points be treated when doing a regression analysis? b. What is the coefficient of determination and what does it measure? c. What is extrapolation? Should extrapolation ever be used?

The following table gives the distance from Boston to each city and the cost of a train ticket from Boston to that city for a certain date. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline \text { City } & \text { Distance (in miles) } & \text { Ticket Price (in \$) } \\ \hline \text { Washington, } & 439 & 181 \\ \text { D.C. } & & \\ \hline \text { Hartford } & 102 & 73 \\ \hline \text { New York } & 215 & 79 \\ \hline \text { Philadelphia } & 310 & 293 \\ \hline \text { Baltimore } & 406 & 175 \\ \hline \text { Charlotte } & 847 & 288 \\ \hline \text { Miami } & 1499 & 340 \\ \hline \text { Roanoke } & 680 & 219 \\ \hline \text { Atlanta } & 1086 & 310 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { City } & \text { Distance (in miles) } & \text { Ticket Price (in \$) } \\ \hline \text { Tampa } & 1349 & 370 \\ \text { Montgomery } & 1247 & 373 \\ \text { Columbus } & 776 & 164 \\ \hline \text { Indianapolis } & 950 & 245 \\ \hline \text { Detroit } & 707 & 189 \\ \hline \text { Nashville } & 1105 & 245 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Use technology to produce a scatterplot. Based on your scatterplot do you think there is a strong linear relationship between these two variables? Explain. b. Compute \(r\) and write the equation of the regression line. Use the words "Ticket Price" and "Distance" in your equation. Round off to two decimal places. c. Provide an interpretation of the slope of the regression line. d. Provide an interpretation of the \(y\) -intercept of the regression line or explain why it would not be appropriate to do so. e. Use the regression equation to predict the cost of a train ticket from Boston to Pittsburgh, a distance of 572 miles.

The distance (in kilometers) and price (in dollars) for one-way airline tickets from San Francisco to several cities are shown in the table. $$ \begin{array}{|lcc|} \hline \text { Destination } & \text { Distance }(\mathbf{k m}) & \text { Price (\$) } \\ \hline \text { Chicago } & 2960 & 229 \\ \hline \text { New York City } & 4139 & 299 \\ \hline \text { Seattle } & 1094 & 146 \\ \hline \text { Austin } & 2420 & 127 \\ \hline \text { Atlanta } & 3440 & 152 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Find the correlation coefficient for this data using a computer or statistical calculator. Use distance as the \(x\) -variable and price as the \(y\) -variable. b. Recalculate the correlation coefficient for this data using price as the \(x\) -variable and distance as the \(y\) -variable. What effect does this have on the correlation coefficient? c. Suppose a $$\$ 50$$ security fee was added to the price of each ticket. What effect would this have on the correlation coefficient? d. Suppose the airline held an incredible sale, where travelers got a round- trip ticket for the price of a one-way ticket. This means that the distances would be doubled while the ticket price remained the same. What effect would this have on the correlation coefficient?

Assume that in a political science class, the teacher gives a midterm exam and a final exam. Assume that the association between midterm and final scores is linear. The summary statistics have been simplified for clarity see Guidance on page \(209 .\) Midterm: Mean \(=75, \quad\) Standard deviation \(=10\) Final: Mean \(=75, \quad\) Standard deviation \(=10\) Also, \(r=0.7\) and \(n=20\). According to the regression equation, for a student who gets a 95 on the midterm, what is the predicted final exam grade? What phenomenon from the chapter does this demonstrate? Explain. See page 209 for guidance.

If the correlation between height and weight of a large group of people is \(0.67\), find the \(\mathrm{co}\) efficient of determination (as a percentage) and explain what it means. Assume that height is the predictor and weight is the response, and assume that the association between height and weight is linear.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.