/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 37 The correlation between height a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The correlation between height and armspan in a sample of adult women was found to be \(r=0.948 .\) The correlation between arm span and height in a sample of adult men was found to be \(r=0.868\). Assuming both associations are linear, which association-the association between height and arm span for women, or the association between height and arm span for men-is stronger? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The association between height and arm span is stronger for women with a correlation coefficient of \(r=0.948\) compared to men with a correlation coefficient of \(r=0.868\).

Step by step solution

01

Recognize the Information Given

Identify the correlation coefficients for the two populations. For women, the correlation coefficient, r, between height and arm span is 0.948. For men, the correlation coefficient, r, between height and arm span is 0.868.
02

Compare the Correlation Coefficients

Compare the two correlation coefficients. The coefficient that is closer to 1 signifies a stronger direct linear relationship.
03

Interpret the Result

Since the correlation coefficient for women is 0.948, which is closer to 1 than the correlation coefficient for men, which is 0.868, the association between height and arm span is stronger for women than for men.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Relationship
A linear relationship describes a straight-line connection between two variables. When graphed, such a relationship will show as a straight line, indicating that as one variable increases or decreases, the other does the same at a constant rate. This kind of relationship is often represented mathematically by the equation of a line, \[ y = mx + b \] where \( y \) is the dependent variable, \( x \) is the independent variable, \( m \) is the slope, and \( b \) is the y-intercept. Linear relationships are pivotal in statistics because they simplify the analysis of data by allowing predictions and interpretations using a straightforward model. In the provided scenario, both the height and arm span for adult women and men are assumed to show a linear relationship. Therefore, we can use their linear correlation coefficients to determine the strength of these relationships.
Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, often represented as \( r \), quantifies the degree of linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1, where:
  • 1 indicates a perfect positive linear relationship,
  • -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship,
  • 0 represents no linear correlation at all.
A value closer to 1 signifies a strong direct linear relationship, meaning as one variable increases, so does the other. Conversely, a value near -1 indicates a strong inverse relationship, where one variable increases as the other decreases. In the exercise, we see two correlation coefficients: 0.948 for women and 0.868 for men. The closer these values are to 1, the stronger the linear relationship between height and arm span is. The correlation coefficient helps us compare and decide which group exhibits a stronger relationship, with women showing a slightly higher correlation in this context.
Statistical Data Analysis
Statistical data analysis involves the process of collecting, organizing, interpreting, and presenting data. Through statistical methods, we aim to identify patterns and relationships among variables, aiding in informed decision-making and predictions based on data evidence. One key technique in statistical data analysis is the use of correlation, which helps in understanding the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. To determine the strength of these relationships in our exercise, we used the correlation coefficient. Other techniques in statistical data analysis include:
  • Descriptive statistics, which summarize the data set.
  • Inferential statistics, which make predictions or inferences about a population based on a sample.
  • Regression analysis, which explores the relationship between dependent and independent variables.
By applying these methods, statisticians can provide insights into the data, drawing conclusions such as the one in our exercise, where the strength of the relationship is quantified using the correlation coefficient.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following table gives the distance from Boston to each city (in thousands of miles) and gives the time for one randomly chosen, commercial airplane to make that flight. Do a complete regression analysis that includes a scatterplot with the line, interprets the slope and intercept, and predicts how much time a nonstop flight from Boston to Seattle would take. The distance from Boston to Seattle is 3000 miles. See page 209 for guidance. $$ \begin{array}{|lcc|} \hline \text { City } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Distance } \\ \text { (1000s of miles) } \end{array} & \text { Time (hours) } \\ \hline \text { St. Louis } & 1.141 & 2.83 \\ \hline \text { Los Angeles } & 2.979 & 6.00 \\ \hline \text { Paris } & 3.346 & 7.25 \\ \hline \text { Denver } & 1.748 & 4.25 \\ \hline \text { Salt Lake City } & 2.343 & 5.00 \\ \hline \text { Houston } & 1.804 & 4.25 \\ \hline \text { New York } & 0.218 & 1.25 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Suppose that the growth rate of children looks like a straight line if the height of a child is observed at the ages of 24 months, 28 months, 32 months, and 36 months. If you use the regression obtained from these ages and predict the height of the child at 21 years, you might find that the predicted height is 20 feet. What is wrong with the prediction and the process used?

In Exercise \(4.1\) there is a graph of the relationship between SAT score and college GPA. SAT score was the predictor and college GPA was the response variable. If you reverse the variables so that college GPA was the predictor and SAT score was the response variable, what effect would this have on the numerical value of the correlation coefficient?

The data shows the number of calories, carbohydrates (in grams) and sugar (in grams) found in a selection of menu items at McDonald's. Scatterplots suggest the relationship between calories and both carbs and sugars is linear. The data are also available on this text's website. (Source: shapefit.com) $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Calories } & \text { Carbs (in grams) } & \text { Sugars (in grams) } \\ \hline 530 & 47 & 9 \\ \hline 520 & 42 & 10 \\ \hline 720 & 52 & 14 \\ \hline 610 & 47 & 10 \\ \hline 600 & 48 & 12 \\ \hline 540 & 45 & 9 \\ \hline 740 & 43 & 10 \\ \hline 240 & 32 & 6 \\ \hline 290 & 33 & 7 \\ \hline 340 & 37 & 7 \\ \hline 300 & 32 & 6 \\ \hline 430 & 35 & 7 \\ \hline 380 & 34 & 7 \\ \hline 430 & 35 & 6 \\ \hline 440 & 35 & 7 \\ \hline 430 & 34 & 7 \\ \hline 750 & 65 & 16 \\ \hline 590 & 51 & 14 \\ \hline 510 & 55 & 10 \\ \hline 350 & 42 & 8 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \text { Calories } & \text { Carbs (in grams) } & \text { Sugars (in grams) } \\ \hline 670 & 58 & 11 \\ \hline 510 & 44 & 9 \\ \hline 610 & 57 & 11 \\ \hline 450 & 43 & 9 \\ \hline 360 & 40 & 5 \\ \hline 360 & 40 & 5 \\ \hline 430 & 41 & 6 \\ \hline 480 & 43 & 6 \\ \hline 430 & 43 & 7 \\ \hline 390 & 39 & 5 \\ \hline 500 & 44 & 11 \\ \hline 670 & 68 & 12 \\ \hline 510 & 54 & 10 \\ \hline 630 & 56 & 7 \\ \hline 480 & 42 & 6 \\ \hline 610 & 56 & 8 \\ \hline 450 & 42 & 6 \\ \hline 540 & 61 & 14 \\ \hline 380 & 47 & 12 \\ \hline 340 & 37 & 8 \\ \hline 260 & 30 & 7 \\ \hline 340 & 34 & 5 \\ \hline 260 & 27 & 4 \\ \hline 360 & 32 & 3 \\ \hline 280 & 25 & 2 \\ \hline 330 & 26 & 3 \\ \hline 190 & 12 & 0 \\ \hline 750 & 65 & 16 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Calculate the correlation coefficient and report the equation of the regression line using carbs as the predictor and calories as the response variable. Report the slope and interpret it in the context of this problem. Then use your regression equation to predict the number of calories in a menu item containing 55 grams of carbohydrates. b. Calculate the correlation coefficient and report the equation of the regression line using sugar as the predictor and calories as the response variable. Report the slope and interpret it in the context of this problem. Then use your regression equation to predict the number of calories in a menu item containing 10 grams of sugars. c. Based on your answers to parts (a) and (b), which is a better predictor of calories for these data: carbs or sugars? Explain your choice using appropriate statistics.

Data on the number of home runs, strikeouts, and batting averages for a sample of 50 Major League Baseball players were obtained. Regression analyses were conducted on the relationships between home runs and strikeouts and between home runs and batting averages. The StatCrunch results are shown below. (Source: mlb.com) Simple linear regression results: Dependent Variable: Home Runs Independent Variable: Strikeouts Home Runs \(=0.092770565+0.22866236\) Strikeouts Sample size: 50 \(\mathrm{R}\) (correlation coefficient) \(=0.63591835\) \(\mathrm{R}-\mathrm{sq}=0.40439215\) Estimate of error standard deviation: \(8.7661607\) Simple linear regression results: Dependent Variable: Home Runs Independent Variable: Batting Average Home Runs \(=45.463921-71.232795\) Batting Average Sample size: 50 \(\mathrm{R}\) (correlation coefficient) \(=-0.093683651\) \(\mathrm{R}-\mathrm{sq}=0.0087766264\) Estimate of error standard deviation: \(11.30876\) Based on this sample, is there a stronger association between home runs and strikeouts or home runs and batting average? Provide a reason for your choice based on the StatCrunch results provided.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.