/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 32 A large concert promoter that op... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A large concert promoter that operates several hundred concert locations around the country wants to survey the managers at these locations to ask their opinions about how to improve attendance at concerts. Because the survey is rather lengthy, the promoter does not want to ask all the managers and decides to ask a random sample of managers instead. The promoter organizes the concert locations into 20 different geographic zones, randomly selects 5 zones, and surveys all of the managers in those 5 zones. Is this an example of stratified random sampling, systematic sampling, or cluster sampling?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sampling method used by the concert promoter is cluster sampling.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the different methods of sampling

Before identifying the type of sample selection method used, the distinct sampling methods need to be understood. \n\n\- Simple Random Sampling: Each member of the population has an equal chance of being included in the sample. Any subset of the population can be chosen randomly to form the sample.\n\n\- Stratified Random Sampling: The entire population is divided into non-overlapping groups or 'strata' based on certain characteristics, and then a simple random sample is selected from each stratum.\n\n\- Systematic Sampling: It starts by selecting an individual at random from the first k individuals in the population and then every kth individual is selected.\n\n\- Cluster Sampling: The population is divided into groups, or 'clusters', and a simple random sample of these clusters is selected. Then all individuals within the chosen clusters are included in the sample. This can help in reducing costs associated with trying to sample from an entire population.
02

Analyse the survey strategy used by the concert promoter

Looking at the exercise's problem statement, it is clear that the concert promoter first divides all the concert locations into 20 different geographic zones (this sounds like the formation of clusters). The promoter then randomly selects 5 zones and surveys all of the managers in the selected zones. All the managers within the selected clusters (zones) make the sample.
03

Identify the method of sampling used

Based on the scenario provided in the exercise and our understanding of different sampling methods from Step 1, it can be concluded that the sampling method used by the concert promoter is Cluster sampling. This is because the promoter has divided the population (concert locations) into several groups or 'clusters' (geographic zones) and then performed a simple random sampling of these clusters. After the clusters have been selected, all members within these clusters are surveyed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cluster Sampling
Cluster sampling is a technique often employed when studying large populations distributed across a wide area, making it challenging to conduct a comprehensive study due to logistical and financial constraints. To put it simply, cluster sampling involves dividing the population into separate groups, known as clusters, which are each representative of the entire population. In the exercise with the concert promoter, the different geographic zones represent these clusters.

After forming the clusters, a random selection of these clusters is made, and then all members within those chosen clusters are surveyed. This contrasts with other methods where individual members from the entire population would be sampled. It’s an efficient approach when each cluster is a miniature representation of the population at large. In our example, by selecting randomly from the 20 geographic zones, the promoter is able to gather a sample that reflects the opinions of managers across different locations, without the need to survey each one.

One thing to remember is that for cluster sampling to be effective, each cluster should be as heterogenous as possible and every cluster should be homogenous to each other, ensuring that each cluster mirrors the population diversity.
Stratified Random Sampling
Stratified random sampling is a bit like organizing a wardrobe by types of clothing and then randomly picking items from each pile to create an outfit that includes every type of garment. It's a method where the population is first stratified into different subgroups or 'strata', which share a particular characteristic. These strata are non-overlapping, and every member of the population belongs to one and only one stratum.

This was not the method used in the concert promoter's strategy according to the exercise, but it's still crucial to understand. After creating the strata, samples are taken from each group, usually through simple random sampling, to reflect the entire population's composition. The key here is that the strata are created based on relevant attributes that are related to the study's objective.

For example, if a school wanted to survey student opinion on a new policy, they might divide the students into strata based on grade level, and then randomly select students from each grade to get a full view of the school's opinion.
Systematic Sampling
Imagine lining up pieces of candy and picking every fifth piece to make a smaller, varied selection. This is the essence of systematic sampling; it's a method where you select your sample at regular intervals from the population. This method requires choosing a starting point at random from the first few individuals in the population and then selecting every kth individual thereafter.

The starting point has to be random, but after that, the selection is systematic. This interval, or sampling frame, is calculated by dividing the population size by your desired sample size. Systematic sampling simplifies the selection process and can often result in a representative sample, provided there's no hidden pattern in the population that coincides with the sampling interval, as this could introduce bias.
Simple Random Sampling
Simple random sampling can be likened to putting names in a hat and drawing them out without looking. It's one of the most straightforward forms of sampling. Each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected, ensuring that the sample is entirely unbiased with regard to the population.

You can perform simple random sampling by using various methods, such as a random number generator or a lottery system. The fundamental principle here is randomness, which means no pattern, preference, or prior knowledge affects the selection of the sample. This method is highly valued for its fairness and simplicity, but it's worth noting that it doesn't take into account the specific characteristics of the population, unlike stratified random sampling.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does frequent use of acetaminophen lead to asthma-related complications among children? Excerpts from the abstract of a study published in The New England Journal of Medicine about this are given (Sheehan et al. 2016). Read them and then answer the questions that follow. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial, we enrolled 300 children (age range, \(12-59\) months) with mild persistent asthmas and assigned them to receive either acetaminophen or ibuprofen when needed for the alleviation of fever or pain over the course of 48 weeks. The primary outcome was the number of asthma exacerbations that let to treatment with systemic glucocorticoids. Results: The number of asthmas exacerbations did not differ significantly between the two groups, with a mean of \(0.81\) per participant with acetaminophen and \(0.87\) per participant in the ibuprofen group \((\mathrm{p}=0.67)\) a. Identify the treatment variable and the response variable. b. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? c. How does the p-value support the conclusion of the study? d. Did this study use random sampling, random assignment, or both?

Imagine two studies of an exercise program that designers claim will make people lose weight. The first study is based on a random sample of 100 men and women who follow the exercise program for 6 months. A hypothesis test is carried out to determine whether their mean weight change from the start of the program to 6 months following the program is negative. The second study was based on a random sample of 100 men (no women) who followed the exercise program for 6 months. The same hypothesis test is carried out to determine whether their mean weight change is negative. a. Which study will have more variability in the populations from which the samples are drawn? b. Assuming the exercise program is more effective for men than women, which study will have more power? Explain.

For exercises 12.51-12.53, evaluate the study based on the extracts from the study abstracts by answering the following questions: a. What is the research question that the investigators are trying the answer? b. What is their answer to the research question? c. What were the methods they used to collect data? d. Is the conclusion appropriate for the methods used to collect data? e. To what population do the conclusions apply? f. Have the results been replicated (reproduced) in other articles? According to the National Institute of Mental Health, Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is a mental health disorder that affects up to \(7 \%\) of the population of the United States. Because many SAD patients experience inadequate symptom relief with available treatments, researchers in this study investigated the use of ketamine to treat SAD patients (Taylor et al. 2018 ). Read the following excerpts from the study abstract and evaluate the study using the given questions. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial in 18 adults with Social Anxiety Disorder and compared the effects between intravenous ketamine and placebo on social phobia symptoms. Ketamine and placebo infusions were administered in a random order with a 28 -day washout period between infusions. Ratings of anxiety were assessed 3 -hours post-infusion and followed for 14 days. Outcomes were blinded ratings on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) and self-reported anxiety on a visual analog scale (VAS-Anxiety). Results: We found ketamine resulted in a significantly greater reduction in anxiety relative to placebo on the \(\operatorname{LSAS}(p=0.01)\) but not the VAS-Anxiety \((p=0.95)\). Participants were significantly more likely to exhibit a treatment response after ketamine infusion relative to placebo in the first 2 weeks following infusion measured on the LSAS (33.33\% response ketamine vs \(0 \%\) response placebo, \(p=0.025\) ) and VAS (88.89\% response ketamine vs \(52.94 \%\) response placebo, \(p=0.034\) ). Conclusion: This trial provides initial evidence that ketamine may be effective in reducing anxiety.

Researchers are interested in testing whether a video game that is designed to increase brain activity actually works. To test this, they plan to randomly assign subjects to either the treatment group (spend 15 minutes per day playing the game) or a control group (spend 15 minutes per day surfing the Web). At the end of the study, the researchers will administer a test of "brain teasers" to see which group has the greater mental agility. Because they suspect that age might affect the outcome, the researchers will create blocks of ages: \(18-25,26-35,36-45\), and \(46-55\). To randomly assign subjects to treatment or control, they will place four tickets in a box. The tickets are labeled with the age groups. When an age group is selected, everyone in that age group will be assigned to the treatment group. They will select two age groups to go to treatment, and two to go to control. Is this an appropriate use of blocking? If so, explain why. If not, describe a better blocking plan.

Harvard Women's Health Watch reported on a 2016 study on the association between various forms of exercise and health. In this study, researchers used data from large British and Scottish health studies to see if some forms of activity had greater health benefits than others. They examined the association between six different types of exercise with the overall risk of death and death from cardiovascular disease in particular. Researchers found that racket sports were associated with the greatest reduction in risk of death from any cause, including cardiovascular disease, followed by swimming, aerobics, and cycling. Whatever activity participants chose, risk of death dropped the more often they exercised. Was this more likely to have been a controlled experiment or an observational study? How do you know? (Source: https://www health.harvard.edu/exercise-and- fitness/large-study-indicates-racketsports-offer-best-protection-against- cardiac-death)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.