/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 66 In Montreal, Canada, an experime... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In Montreal, Canada, an experiment was done with parents of children who were thought to have a high risk of committing crimes when they became teenagers (Tremblay et al., 1996 ). Some of the families were randomly assigned to receive parental training, and the others were not. Out of 43 children whose parents were randomly assigned to the parental training group, 6 had been arrested by the age of \(15 .\) Out of 123 children whose parents were not in the parental training group, 37 had been arrested by age 15 . a. Find and compare the percentages of children arrested by age \(15 .\) Is this what researchers might have hoped? b. Create a two-way table from the data, and test whether the treatment program is associated with arrests. Use a significance level of \(0.05\). c. Do a two-proportion \(z\) -test, testing whether the parental training lowers the rate of bad results. Use a significance level of \(0.05\). d. Explain the difference in the results of the chi-square test and the twoproportion \(z\) -test. e. Can you conclude that the treatment causes the better result? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A smaller percentage of children whose parents received training (13.95%) were arrested by the age of 15 compared to those whose parents did not receive training (30.08%). Based on the chi-square test and the two proportion z-test, there is sufficient statistical evidence indicating that parental training has a significant association with lower arrest rates. However, it is also important to include a caveat that this correlation does not necessarily equate to causality; other socio-economic factors could be involved.

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of percentages

To calculate the percentages of children arrested by 15, divide the number of arrests per group by the total number in each group and multiply by 100. For the parental training group, \(\frac{6}{43} * 100 ≈ 13.95% \) and for the non-training group, \(\frac{37}{123} * 100 ≈ 30.08% \). This means that less children whose parents were trained were arrested, indicating a positive outcome.
02

Creating a two-way table

Create a two-way table with 'Parental Training' and 'No Parental Training' as columns. In the rows, group the results as 'Arrested' and 'Not Arrested'. Fill in the counts from the question prompt.
03

Chi-square test

The Chi-square test is used to reveal if the observed distribution of cases falls within the expected one. Use a significance level of 0.05. Input the counts from the two-way table into a Chi-square test calculator, along with the sample sizes of the two groups (43 and 123). Record the results.
04

Two-proportion z-test

The two-proportion z-test reveals if the proportions from two groups are significantly different. Use a significance level of 0.05, and input the counts and sample sizes per group. Perform the test and record the results.
05

Explanation

The results from the Chi-square test show if there is a significant association between the two groups, that is, if incidence of arrest is connected with parental training. The z-test indicates if the proportions of the two groups are distinct. Compare and contrast these results.
06

Conclusion

Indicate if the parental training causes a decrease in arrest incidence, based on the statistical evidence available. Consideration should be given to the statistical results, as well as to external confounding factors not examined in this study, such as socio-economic status, parenting style beyond the training, etc.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The table shows the percentage of all men and women in the United States aged 18 to 44 who meet aerobic fitness guidelines. Give two reasons why a chi- square test is not appropriate for this data. $$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline & {\text { Percentage Meeting Fitness Guidelines }} \\\\\hline \text { Year } & \text { Men } & \text { Women } \\ \hline 2005 & 50.0 & 43.1 \\ \hline 2010 & 59.0 & 48.5 \\ \hline 2014 & 60.8 & 52.7 \\ \hline\end{array}$$

Suppose you are testing two different injections by randomly assigning them to children who react badly to bee stings and go to the emergency room. You observe whether the children are substantially improved within an hour after the injection. However, one of the expected counts is less than 5 .

The Perry Preschool Project discussed in exercises \(10.39\) to \(10.41\) found that 8 of the 58 students who attended preschool had at least one felony arrest by age 40 and that 31 of the 65 students who did not attend preschool had at least one felony arrest (Schweinhart et al. 2005). a. Compare the percentages descriptively. What does this comparison suggest? b. Create a two-way table from the data and do a chi-square test on it, using a significance level of \(0.05\). Test the hypothesis that preschool attendance is associated with being arrested. c. Do a two-proportion \(z\) -test. Your alternative hypothesis should be that preschool attendance lowers the chances of arrest. d. What advantage does the two-proportion \(z\) -test have over the chi-square test?

In Chapter 9 , you learned some tests of means. Are tests of means used for numerical or categorical data?

There is a theory that relative finger length depends on testosterone level. The table shows a summary of the outcomes of an observational study that one of the authors carried out to determine whether men or women were more likely to have a ring finger that appeared longer than their index finger. Identify both of the variables, and state whether they are numerical or categorical. If numerical, state whether they are continuous or discrete. $$\begin{array}{|lcc|}\hline & \text { Men } & \text { Women } \\\\\hline \text { Ring Finger Longer } & 23 & 13 \\\\\hline \text { Ring Finger Not Longer } & 4 & 14 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.