/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 In the study referenced in exerc... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In the study referenced in exercise \(10.8\), researchers also asked whether or not students bought fast food at least one to two times per week. The data are reported by gender in the table. $$\begin{array}{lcc}\text { Buy fast food at least 1-2 times weekly } & \text { Females } & \text { Males } \\\\\hline \text { Yes } & 138 & 85 \\ \text { No } & 160 & 58\end{array}$$ a. Find the row, column, and grand totals, and prepare a table showing these values as well as the counts given. b. Find the percentage of students overall who buy fast food at least 1 or 2 times weekly. Round off to one decimal place. c. Find the expected number who buy fast food at least 1 or 2 times weekly for each gender. Round to two decimal places as needed. d. Find the expected number who did not buy fast food at least 1 or 2 times weekly for each gender. Round to two decimal places as needed. e. Calculate the observed value of the chi-square statistic.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The percentage of students who buy fast food at least once or twice a week is 50.6%. The expected numbers who buy fast food at least once or twice a week are 150.5 for females and 72.5 for males. The expected numbers who didn't buy fast food at least once or twice a week are 147.5 for females and 70.5 for males. The observed value of the chi-square statistic is 6.52.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Row, Column and Grand Total

Add up the numbers in each row and column to find the row and column totals. The grand total can be found by adding up all numbers.\n Row Totals \nYes: 138(Females) + 85(Males) = 223 \nNo: 160(Females) + 58(Males) = 218 \nColumn Totals \nFemales: 138(Yes) + 160(No) = 298 \nMales: 85(Yes) + 58(No) = 143 \nGrand Total: 298(Females) + 143(Males) = 441
02

Prepare Table with Totals and Counts

Place all the numbers, including totals in the table \n $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Females } & \text { Males } & \text { Total } \\\hline \text { Yes } & 138 & 85 & 223 \\ \text { No } & 160 & 58 & 218 \\\hline \text {Total} & 298 & 143 & 441 \end{array}$$
03

Calculate Percentage

To find the percentage of students who buy fast food at least 1 or 2 times weekly, compute the total number of students who buy fast food weekly (223) divided by the grand total (441).\nPercentage : (223 / 441) X 100 = 50.6%.
04

Find Expected Number

To calculate the expected number for those who buy fast food weekly, multiply the row total for 'yes' by the column total for each gender and divide by the grand total. \nFor females: (223(Yes Total) X 298(Females Total)) / 441(Grand Total) = 150.5 \nFor males: (223(Yes Total) X 143(Males Total)) / 441(Grand Total) = 72.5.
05

Expected Number for Non-buyers

Similarly, to calculate the expected number for those who do not buy fast food weekly, multiply the row total for 'no' by the column total for each gender and divide by the grand total. \nFor females: (218(No Total) X 298(Females Total)) / 441(Grand Total) = 147.5. \nFor males: (218(No Total) X 143(Males Total)) / 441(Grand Total) = 70.5.
06

Observed Value of the Chi-Square Statistic

The Chi-square statistic can be calculated by the formula \[\chi^2 = \sum\frac{(O-E)^2}{E}\] where O refers to the observed frequency and E refers to the expected frequency. Compute this for each group and add them together to get the chi-square statistic. Calculation should look like follows: \nFemales who buy fast food: \((138-150.5)^2 / 150.5) = 1.05\) \nMales who buy fast food: \((85-72.5)^2 / 72.5) = 2.17\) \nFemales who don't buy fast food: \((160-147.5)^2 / 147.5) = 1.07\) \nMales who don't buy fast food: \((58-70.5)^2 / 70.5) = 2.23\) \nThen add them all together: \(1.05 + 2.17 + 1.07 + 2.23 = 6.52\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Contingency Table Analysis
Contingency table analysis plays a central role in the field of descriptive statistics, particularly when we aim to understand the relationship between categorical variables. In the provided exercise, the contingency table helps us visualize and analyze the frequencies of male and female students who buy fast food at least once or twice weekly.

The table is structured to show the counts of students across two categories - 'Buy fast food at least 1-2 times weekly' and gender. The first step in this analysis involves calculating the row, column, and grand totals, which are essential in interpreting the table and calculating subsequent percentages and expected frequencies. Rows represent the total counts for each category of the variable (Yes or No for buying fast food), columns represent the sub-categories within the variable (gender), and the grand total signifies the sum of all observations in the table.

By doing so, we can quickly ascertain whether the distribution of students buying fast food differs significantly by gender, which could be indicative of a broader, potentially insightful trend in eating habits among the genders studied.
Expected Frequency
Expected frequency is a Keystone concept in any chi-square analysis, describing the number of occurrences that we would predict based on the assumption of no association between the variables.

For instance, our exercise asks us to calculate the expected number of male and female students who buy fast food weekly (and those who do not). These expectations are not pulled from thin air but are calculated based on the proportion of students as a whole who engage in this behavior, considering their distribution across genders.

The expected frequency for each cell in a contingency table is calculated by multiplying the total for its row by the total for its column, and then dividing by the grand total. This gives us a figure against which the observed frequency can be compared, and it is crucial because it supports the chi-square test in evaluating whether the observed frequencies diverge significantly from what we would expect if there were no association between the variables.
Descriptive Statistics
Descriptive statistics typically summarizes data in a way that meaningfully describes a dataset, often providing simple summaries about the sample and the measures. In our case, the summaries are the calculated percentages and frequencies of students' habits of buying fast food.

These summaries are immensely valuable as they give us the first glance at our data, enabling us to see patterns or get insights into the dataset as a whole. The percentage calculation in step 3, resulting in 50.6%, tells us that slightly more than half of the students buy fast food once or twice weekly. Such a descriptive statistic is straightforward but powerful, offering a clear and understandable metric to gauge the prevalence of this dietary behavior in the study's population.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is essentially a decision-making tool used to determine if the observed data is sufficiently different from what we would expect under a specific statistical model. In the chi-square statistic context of our exercise, it refers to whether the differences in the observed counts of students buying fast food versus those who do not (broken down by gender) are simply due to chance, or if they reflect a real and notable pattern.

The chi-square test achieves this by comparing the observed frequencies to the expected frequencies and determining if the discrepancies are greater than what could reasonably occur by random variation. It's symbolized by the chi-square statistic, as calculated in step 6. If this calculated chi-square statistic exceeds a certain threshold, which corresponds to a predefined significance level (often 5%), we conclude that the observed differences are statistically significant. This means that gender might indeed influence the likelihood of buying fast food one or two times weekly within the studied population, offering a foundation for further analysis or policy-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a 2015 study reported in the Journal of American College Health, Cho. et al. surveyed college students on their use of apps to monitor their exercise and fitness. The data are reported in the table. Test the hypothesis that fitness app use and gender are associated. Use a \(0.05\) significance level. See page 552 for guidance. $$\begin{array}{|ccc|}\hline \text { Use } & \text { Male } & \text { Female } \\\ \hline \text { Yes } & 84 & 268 \\ \hline \text { No } & 9 & 57 \\ \hline\end{array}$$

Suppose a polling organization asks a random sample of people if they are Democrat, Republican, or Other and asks them if they think the country is headed in the right direction or the wrong direction. If we wanted to test whether party affiliation and answer to the question were associated, would this be a test of homogeneity or a test of independence? Explain.

a. In Chapter 8, you learned some tests of proportions. Are tests of proportions used for categorical or numerical data? b. In this chapter, you are learning to use chi-square tests. Do these tests apply to categorical or numerical data?

In a 2009 study reported in the New England Journal of Medicine, Boyer et al. randomly assigned children aged 6 months to 18 years who had nonlethal scorpion stings to receive an experimental antivenom or a placebo. "Good" results were no symptoms after four hours and no detectable plasma venom. $$\begin{array}{|lccc|}\hline & \text { Antivenom } & \text { Placebo } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { No Improvement } & 1 & 6 & 7 \\ \hline \text { Improvement } & 7 & 1 & 8 \\\\\hline \text { Total } & 8 & 7 & 15 \\ \hline\end{array}$$ The alternative hypothesis is that the antivenom leads to improvement. The p-value for a one-tailed Fisher's Exact Test with these data is \(0.009\). a. Suppose the study had turned out differently, as in the following table. $$\begin{array}{|lcc|}\hline & \text { Antivenom } & \text { Placebo } \\ \hline \text { Bad } & 0 & 7 \\\\\hline \text { Good } & 8 & 0 \\ \hline\end{array}$$ Would Fisher's Exact Test have led to a p-value larger or smaller than \(0.009\) ? Explain. b. Suppose the study had turned out differently, as in the following table. $$\begin{array}{|lcc|}\hline & \text { Antivenom } & \text { Placebo } \\\\\hline \text { Bad } & 2 & 5 \\ \text { Good } & 6 & 2 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ Would Fisher's Exact Test have led to a p-value larger or smaller than \(0.009\) ? Explain. c. Try the two tests, and report the p-values. Were you right? Search for a Fisher's Exact Test calculator on the Internet, and use it.

Suppose there is a theory that \(90 \%\) of the people in the United States dream in color. You survey a random sample of 200 people; 198 report that they dream in color, and 2 report that they do not. You wish to verify the claim made in the theory.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.