/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 53 Answer the questions using compl... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Answer the questions using complete sentences. a. What is an influential point? b. It has been noted that people who go to church frequently tend to have lower blood pressure than people who don't go to church. Does this mean you can lower your blood pressure by going to church? Why of why not? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
An influential point is a data point that significantly affects the results of a statistical analysis or a regression model. On the other hand, although there is a correlation between frequent church attendance and lower blood pressure, it doesn't mean attending church can directly lower blood pressure. Correlation is not causation, and there may be other variables or confounding factors affecting blood pressure, such as lifestyle, diet, and stress levels

Step by step solution

01

Define an Influential point

An influential point in statistic is an observation or data point that can have a significant effect on the results of a statistical analysis or a regression model. The influential point can severely impact the slope of the line in a linear regression model, thus it can influence the correlation and calculations of a model.
02

Analyze church attendance and blood pressure scenario

From the statement, it is observed that people who regularly go to church tend to have lower blood pressure. One might assume from this observation that going to church lowers blood pressure. However, this is merely a correlation, not a causation.
03

Interpret the scenario

Correlation does not imply causation. Although the data shows a correlation between church attendance and lower blood pressure, it does not mean one is the cause of the other. There could be other underlying factors contributing to lower blood pressure in frequent church-goers, such as lifestyle, diet, stress levels, or even the social support they receive from a religious community. Therefore, we cannot conclusively say that going to church directly results in lower blood pressure without more specific evidence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Influential Point
In statistical analysis, some data points stand out more than others. An influential point is one such anomaly. It is a specific observation that can heavily impact the result of a statistical analysis, especially a linear regression model. In simple terms, an influential point can significantly change the slope and position of the line that a linear regression tries to fit through the data points.

Imagine a straight line drawn through a series of dots on a graph. Most dots align or nearly align to form a recognizable pattern. However, if one dot lies far away from this line, it can pull the line towards itself when calculating the best fit.

  • An influential point skews data outcomes.
  • It can mislead conclusions if not accounted for.
Detecting these points is key in ensuring accurate analyses, because they show deviations that might imply unique factors at play. Hence, it's crucial to be cautious of influential points in data sets, as they might represent unique conditions or errors.
Correlation vs Causation
When we say two things are correlated, it means there is a relationship between them; they tend to occur together. For instance, we might observe that people who eat more fruits often weigh less. This scenario demonstrates a correlation where two occurrences - fruit consumption and body weight - seem linked.

However, correlation does not mean that one event is causing the other. Causation implies that one event is directly influencing the occurrence of the other. This means eating fruits causes weight loss.

  • Correlation shows a relationship.
  • Causation shows a cause-effect relationship.
  • Not all correlations imply causation.
In our original problem about church attendance and blood pressure, we notice a correlation. People who frequent church may show lower blood pressure. Yet, without deeper analysis, it is incorrect to conclude church attendance lowers blood pressure. Other factors, like social support or healthier lifestyles, may account for this observation. Thus, always remember to distinguish correlation from causation to avoid misguided conclusions.
Linear Regression
Linear regression is a fundamental statistical technique that's used to model the relationship between two variables. This method finds the best straight line that minimizes the difference between observed values and those predicted by the line itself.

The equation of a linear regression line is typically represented as:

\[ y = mx + b \]

  • **\( y \):** Dependent variable (what you're trying to predict).
  • **\( m \):** Slope of the line (rate of change).
  • **\( x \):** Independent variable.
  • **\( b \):** Y-intercept (the value of \( y \) when \( x \) is 0).
In a simple linear regression, the goal is to calculate \( m \) and \( b \), which provide insights on how changing one variable impacts another. While this model is useful, it’s essential to be mindful of those influential points again, as they can distort our predictions and lead to inaccurate models. Thus, employing linear regression requires data scrutiny to ensure reliable, actionable insights.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A car is being driven at an average speed range of \(50-70 \mathrm{kmph}\). The table shows distances between selected cities and the time taken by the car to cover these kilometers. a. Calculate the correlation of the numbers shown in the part a table by using a computer or statistical calculator. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Distance (km) } & \text { Time (hrs) } \\ \hline 120 & 2 \\ \hline 294 & 4 \\ \hline 160 & 3 \\ \hline 340 & 6 \\ \hline 310 & 5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ b. The table for part b shows the same information, except that the distance was converted to meters by multiplying the number of kilometers by 1000 . What happens to the correlation when numbers are multiplied by a constant? $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Distance (m) } & \text { Time (hrs) } \\ \hline 120000 & 2 \\ \hline 294000 & 4 \\ \hline 160000 & 3 \\ \hline 340000 & 6 \\ \hline 310000 & 5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ c. Suppose the \(0.5\) hour that is lost at toll booths is added to the hours during each travel, no matter how long the distance is. The table for part \(c\) shows the new data. What happens to the correlation when a constant is added to cach number? $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Distance (km) } & \text { Time (hrs) } \\ \hline 120 & 2.5 \\ \hline 294 & 4.5 \\ \hline 160 & 3.5 \\ \hline 340 & 6.5 \\ \hline 310 & 5.5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

The table shows the heights (in inches) and weights (in pounds) of 14 college men. The scatterplot shows that the association is linear enough to proceed. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { Height } \\ \text { (inches) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Weight } \\ \text { (pounds) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Height } \\ \text { (inches) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Weight } \\ \text { (pounds) } \end{array} \\ \hline 68 & 205 & 70 & 200 \\ \hline 68 & 168 & 69 & 175 \\ \hline 74 & 230 & 72 & 210 \\ \hline 68 & 190 & 72 & 205 \\ \hline 67 & 185 & 72 & 185 \\ \hline 69 & 190 & 71 & 200 \\ \hline 68 & 165 & 73 & 195 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Find the equation for the regression line with weight (in pounds) as the response and height (in inches) as the predictor. Report the slope and intercept of the regression line, and explain what they show. If the intercept is not appropriate to report, explain why. b. Find the correlation between weight (in pounds) and height (in inches). c. Find the coefficient of determination and interpret it. d. If you changed each height to centimeters by multiplying heights in inches by \(2.54\), what would the new correlation be? Explain. e. Find the equation with weight (in pounds) as the response and height (in \(\mathrm{cm}\) ) as the predictor, and interpret the slope. f. Summarize what you found: Does changing units change the correlation? Does changing units change the regression cquation?

The table shows the self-reported number of semesters completed and the number of units completed for 15 students at a community college. All units were counted, but attending summer school was not included as a semester. a. Make a scatterplot with the number of semesters on the \(x\) -axis and the number of units on the \(y\) -axis. Does one point stand out as unusual? Explain why it is unusual. (At most colleges, full-time students take between 12 and 18 units per semester.) Finish cach part two ways, with and without the unusual point, and comment on the differences. b. Find the numerical values for the correlation between semesters and units. c. Find the two equations for the two regression lines. d. Insert the lines. Use technology if possible. e. Report the slopes and intercepts of the regression lines and explain what they show. If the intercepts are not appropriate to report, explain why. $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Sems } & \text { Units } \\ \hline 2 & 21.0 \\ \hline 4 & 130.0 \\ \hline 5 & 50.0 \\ \hline 7 & 112.0 \\ \hline 3 & 45.5 \\ \hline 3 & 32.0 \\ \hline 8 & 140.0 \\ \hline 0 & 0.0 \\ \hline \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Sems } & \text { Units } \\ \hline 3 & 30.0 \\ \hline 4 & 60.0 \\ \hline 3 & 45.0 \\ \hline 5 & 70.0 \\ \hline 3 & 32.0 \\ \hline 8 & 70.0 \\ \hline 6 & 60.0 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$

The table shows the weights and prices of some turkeys at different supermarkets. a. Make a scatterplot with weight on the \(x\) -axis and cost on the \(y\) -axis. Include the regression line on your scatterplot. b. Find the numerical value for the correlation between weight and price. Explain what the sign of the correlation shows. c. Report the equation of the best-fit straight line, using weight as the predictor \((x)\) and cost as the response \((y)\). d. Report the slope and intercept of the regression line, and explain what they show. If the intercept is not appropriate to report, explain why. e. Add a new point to your data: a 30 -pound turkey that is free. Give the new value for \(r\) and the new regression equation. Explain what the negative correlation implies. What happened? $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Weight (pounds) } & \text { Price } \\ \hline 12.3 & \$ 17.10 \\ \hline 18.5 & \$ 23.87 \\ \hline 20.1 & \$ 26.73 \\ \hline 16.7 & \$ 19.87 \\ \hline 15.6 & \$ 23.24 \\ \hline 10.2 & \$ 9.08 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

The table gives the distance from Boston to each city (in thousands of miles) and gives the time for one randomly chosen, commercial airplane to make that flight. Do a complete regression analysis that includes a scatterplot with the line, interprets the slope and intercept, and predicts how much time a nonstop flight from Boston to Seattle would take. The distance from Boston to Seattle is 3000 miles. See page 222 for guidance. $$ \begin{array}{|lcc|} \hline \text { City } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Distance } \\ \text { (1000s of miles) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Time } \\ \text { (hours) } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { St. Louis } & 1.141 & 2.83 \\ \hline \text { Los Angeles } & 2.979 & 6.00 \\ \hline \text { Paris } & 3.346 & 7.25 \\ \hline \text { Denver } & 1.748 & 4.25 \\ \hline \text { Salt Lake City } & 2.343 & 5.00 \\ \hline \text { Houston } & 1.804 & 4.25 \\ \hline \text { New York } & 0.218 & 1.25 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.