/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 37 A researcher was interested in t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A researcher was interested in the effect of physical education on the mental alertness in school children. She assigned students of one class to attend a physical education session in the morning while students in the other class attended a science class. The researcher then asked students from both classes to fill out a questionnaire that assessed their attentiveness.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Without actual results from the questionnaires, we cannot provide a definitive answer. The final answer would be based on the statistical analysis comparing attentiveness between the physical education and science groups.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Variables

In this exercise, the independent variable is the type of class the students attend. This is the variable that the researcher changes or controls to test its effects on the outcome variable. The outcome variable or dependent variable is attentiveness, which is determined through survey results. The two levels of the independent variables are physical education class and science class.
02

Understand the Hypothesis

The researcher hypothesizes that the type of class (physical education or science) will have an effect on a student's attentiveness. Essentially, she is testing whether there is a statistical relationship between the type of class and attentiveness. If her hypothesis is correct, we should see noticeably different results in attentiveness between the two classes.
03

Interpret the Results

Look at the responses from the questionnaires for both classes. Statistically analyze the results to determine if the physical activity class shows a significant difference in attentiveness compared to the science class. If the physical education class shows higher attentiveness, then the hypothesis is supported. If not, the research might indicate other factors influencing attentiveness.
04

Formulate Conclusion

Based on results interpretation, this is where the conclusion is formulated. The conclusion should state whether attending physical education session in the morning has an effect on mental alertness in comparison to attending a science class.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Independent Variable
In the study of the effect of physical education on mental alertness, the independent variable is what the researcher manipulates to observe changes in other variables. Here, the independent variable is the type of class the students attend: either a physical education (PE) class or a science class. The independent variable is crucial because it helps establish a controlled environment in which the researcher can isolate the effects of their manipulation on the dependent variable.

To set this up properly, the researcher chose different classes for morning sessions. By doing so, she created two distinct groups with different experiences. This helped ensure that any difference in attentiveness observed could be more confidently attributed to the type of class attended, rather than other external factors. This method of controlling variables is a vital part of experimental design.
  • PE class
  • Science class
The variety in class type acts as a level of the independent variable, allowing comparisons to see its impact on student attentiveness.
Dependent Variable
The dependent variable is what the researcher measures in the experiment. It is affected by changes in the independent variable. In this scenario, the dependent variable is the attentiveness of the students, as determined by the survey results they fill out after class.

Measuring the dependent variable provides insights into the outcomes of the experiment. In this case, the survey results offer a tangible way to gauge the students' mental alertness. It’s important to have a consistent and reliable measure of the dependent variable to ensure the results are valid.

Understanding how the independent variable affects the dependent variable is the backbone of experimental research. This relationship is precisely what researchers are interested in when they study changes and effects.
  • Result measured: Student attentiveness through a questionnaire
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental part of experimental research. It involves making a prediction about the anticipated effects and then testing to see if there is a statistical relationship between the two studied variables. In the context of this exercise, the researcher hypothesizes that attending a physical education class in the morning may enhance attentiveness compared to attending a science class.

The hypothesis is essentially an educated guess that serves as a starting point for your research. It usually predicts a significant difference or relationship due to the independent variable. In this case, if the researcher’s hypothesis is right, the students from the PE class should show a noticeable increase in attentiveness on their questionnaires compared to those from the science class.
  • Initial Hypothesis: Type of class affects attentiveness
Once the hypothesis is formulated, it is crucial to use a structured method, or statistical analysis, to test the validity of the results.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis involves collecting, reviewing, and drawing conclusions from data. In this study, after gathering the questionnaire responses from students in both the PE and science classes, the researcher uses statistical methods to interpret the results.

Statistical analysis will help determine if the changes in attentiveness are significant enough to be attributed to the type of class rather than by chance. Various statistical tools and tests, like a t-test, could be used to analyze the results. If the analysis shows significant differences, it supports the hypothesis that the physical education class improves attentiveness. If not, it might suggest that other factors are influencing attentiveness.
  • Purpose: Determine if differences are statistically significant
  • Outcome: Support or refute the research hypothesis
This step is crucial as it provides the evidence base to accept or reject the hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Favorite Subject At a high school, a few eighth grade students were asked which subject they liked more: mathematics or science. The table shows the results for boys and girls. \(\begin{array}{lccc} & \text { Boys } & \text { Girls } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Mathematics } & 55 & 52 & ? \\ \hline \text { Science } & 67 & 75 & 142 \\ \hline \text { Total } & ? & 127 & ? \\ \hline \end{array}\) a. Figure out the missing totals, and report them in your table. b. What percentage of the boys liked mathematics? c. What percentage of the boys liked science? d. What percentage of the girls liked mathematics? e. What percentage of the students liked science? f. What percentage of the students who liked science were girls? g. What percentage of the students who liked mathematics were boys? h. Suppose that in a group of 800 girls, the percentage who like science is the same as in the sample here. How many of the 800 girls would like science?

As part of a study, sixteen young men performed high-intensity exercise that totaled only 15 minutes in a two-week period. At the end of two weeks, several (but not all) tests for diabetes, such as an insulin sensitivity test, showed improvement. Do these results indicate that brief, highintensity exercise causes an improvement in markers for diabetes? What essential component of both controlled experiments and observational studies is missing from this study? (Source: Babraj et al., Extremely short duration high intensity interval training substantially improves insulin action in young healthy males, BMC Endocrine Disorders, vol. 9: 3 doi: \(10.1186 / 1472-6823-9-3\), January 2009)

Coffee and Prostate Cancer The September 2011 issue of the Berkeley Wellness Letter said that coffee reduces the chance of prostate cancer. A study of 48,000 male health care professionals showed that those consuming the most coffee (six or more cups per day) had a \(60 \%\) reduced risk of developing advanced prostate cancer. Does this mean that a man can reduce his chance of developing prostate cancer by increasing the amount of coffee he drinks?

Coding Explain why the variable Male, in Table \(1 \mathrm{~A}\), is categorical, even though its values are numbers. Often, it does not make sense, or is not even possible, to add the values of a categorical variable. Does it make sense for Male? If so, what does the sum represent?

Effects of Light Exposure (Example 9) A study carried out by Baturin and colleagues looked at the effects of light on female mice. Fifty mice were randomly assigned to a regimen of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark (LD), while another fifty mice were assigned to 24 hours of light (LL). Researchers observed the mice for two years, beginning when the mice were two months old. Four of the LD mice and 14 of the LL mice developed tumors. The accompanying table summarizes the data. (Source: Baturin et al., The effect of light regimen and melatonin on the development of spontaneous mammary tumors in mice, Neuroendocrinology Letters, 2001) $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { LD } & \text { LL } \\ \text { Tumors } & 4 & 14 \\ \hline \text { No tumors } & 46 & 36 \end{array}$$ a. Determine the percentage of mice that developed tumors from each group (LL and LD). Compare them and comment. b. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? How do you know? c. Can we conclude that light for 24 hours a day causes an increase in tumors in mice? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.