/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 In exercise 2,10 observations we... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In exercise 2,10 observations were provided for a dependent variable \(y\) and two independent variables \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2} ;\) for these data \(\mathrm{SST}=15,182.9,\) and \(\mathrm{SSR}=14,052.2\) a. Compute \(R^{2}\) b. Compute \(R_{\mathrm{a}}^{2}\) c. Does the estimated regression equation explain a large amount of the variability in the data? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The model explains 92.5% of the variability; it's a strong fit.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the given data

We are provided with the Sum of Squares Total (SST) and the Sum of Squares Regression (SSR). The formulas for these are: - \( \text{SST} = 15,182.9 \)- \( \text{SSR} = 14,052.2 \).
02

Compute R-squared \( R^2 \)

The coefficient of determination \( R^2 \) is calculated using the formula:\[ R^2 = \frac{\text{SSR}}{\text{SST}} \]Substitute the given values:\[ R^2 = \frac{14,052.2}{15,182.9} \approx 0.925 \]
03

Compute Adjusted R-squared \( R^2_a \)

The adjusted \( R^2 \) is computed using:\[ R^2_a = 1 - \left(1 - R^2\right) \frac{n - 1}{n - p - 1} \]Given:- Number of observations \( n = 10 \)- Number of predictors \( p = 2 \)Substitute these into the formula:\[ R^2_a = 1 - \left(1 - 0.925\right) \frac{10 - 1}{10 - 2 - 1} = 1 - 0.075 \times \frac{9}{7} \approx 0.905 \]
04

Interpret the Results

The \( R^2 \) value is 0.925, meaning 92.5% of the variability in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variables, suggesting a strong relationship.The adjusted \( R^2 \) is 0.905, slightly lower than \( R^2 \), reflecting a more accurate measure considering the predictors.
05

Conclusion

The high values of \( R^2 \) and \( R^2_a \) indicate that the estimated regression model explains a large portion of the variability in the data, suggesting it's a good fit.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Coefficient of Determination
The Coefficient of Determination, often represented as \( R^2 \), is a key metric in regression analysis. It indicates how well the independent variables explain the variability in the dependent variable. In simple terms, it tells us how good our model is at making predictions.

### Understanding \( R^2 \)
The formula to calculate \( R^2 \) is:
  • \[ R^2 = \frac{\text{SSR}}{\text{SST}} \]
Here, \( \text{SSR} \) (Sum of Squares Regression) represents the portion of total variability explained by the model, while \( \text{SST} \) (Sum of Squares Total) is the total variability in the data.

For example, in our data where \( \text{SST} = 15,182.9 \) and \( \text{SSR} = 14,052.2 \), the \( R^2 \) value is approximately 0.925. This means that 92.5% of the variability in our dependent variable, \( y \), is explained by the model. Therefore, this provides a good indication of a strong model fit. The higher the \( R^2 \), the better the model explains the data variability.
Adjusted R-squared
While the Coefficient of Determination \( R^2 \) is useful, it has some limitations, especially when multiple predictors are involved. This is where Adjusted R-squared (\( R^2_a \)) comes into play.

### Why Adjusted R-squared?
This adjusted metric provides a more accurate measure by considering the number of predictors relative to the number of observations. Including more variables in the model generally inflates \( R^2 \), but \( R^2_a \) corrects this by also considering the model complexity.

### Calculating \( R^2_a \)
The formula to compute \( R^2_a \) is:
  • \[ R^2_a = 1 - \left(1 - R^2\right) \frac{n - 1}{n - p - 1} \]
where \( n \) is the total number of observations, and \( p \) is the number of predictors.

In our exercise, with \( n = 10 \) and \( p = 2 \), the Adjusted R-squared is approximately 0.905. Though slightly lower than \( R^2 \), it offers a more realistic view by penalizing the model complexity, ensuring that adding noise variables doesn’t make the model look deceptively strong.
Sum of Squares
Sum of Squares is integral to understanding variability in data within regression analysis.

### Types of Sum of Squares
1. **Total Sum of Squares (\( \text{SST} \))**: This measures the total variance in the data. It's the base level from which all other sums of squares distill their portion.
- \( \text{SST} = 15,182.9 \) in our example. 2. **Regression Sum of Squares (\( \text{SSR} \))**: This indicates the variance explained by the model itself.
- Here, \( \text{SSR} = 14,052.2 \), meaning a large part of the total variance is explained by the regression model.
### Importance in Analysis
By using \( \text{SST} \) and \( \text{SSR} \), we determine how well the model fits via \( R^2 \) and develop a deeper insight into the model’s predictive power. Each part of the Sum of Squares calculation lets us measure and compare how much worse or better our model could perform.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Management proposed the following regression model to predict sales at a fast- food outlet. \\[y=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x_{1}+\beta_{2} x_{2}+\beta_{3} x_{3}+\epsilon\\] where \\[\begin{aligned}x_{1} &=\text { number of competitors within one mile } \\ x_{2} &=\text { population within one mile }(1000 \mathrm{s}) \\ x_{3} &=\left\\{\begin{array}{l} 1 \text { if drive-up window present } \\ 0 \text { otherwise } \end{array}\right.\\\ y &=\text { sales }(\$ 1000 \mathrm{s}) \end{aligned} \\]The following estimated regression equation was developed after 20 outlets were surveyed.\\[ \hat{y}=10.1-4.2 x_{1}+6.8 x_{2}+15.3 x_{3} \\] a. What is the expected amount of sales attributable to the drive-up window? b. Predict sales for a store with two competitors, a population of 8000 within one mile, and no drive-up window. c. Predict sales for a store with one competitor, a population of 3000 within one mile, and a drive-up window.

A 10 -year study conducted by the American Heart Association provided data on how age, blood pressure, and smoking relate to the risk of strokes. Assume that the following data are from a portion of this study. Risk is interpreted as the probability (times 100 ) that the patient will have a stroke over the next 10 -year period. For the smoking variable, define a dummy variable with 1 indicating a smoker and 0 indicating a nonsmoker. $$\begin{array}{cccc} \text { Risk } & \text { Age } & \text { Pressure } & \text { Smoker } \\ 12 & 57 & 152 & \text { No } \\ 24 & 67 & 163 & \text { No } \\ 13 & 58 & 155 & \text { No } \\ 56 & 86 & 177 & \text { Yes } \\ 28 & 59 & 196 & \text { No } \\ 51 & 76 & 189 & \text { Yes } \\ 18 & 56 & 155 & \text { Yes } \\ 31 & 78 & 120 & \text { No } \\ 37 & 80 & 135 & \text { Yes } \\ 15 & 78 & 98 & \text { No } \\ 22 & 71 & 152 & \text { No } \\ 36 & 70 & 173 & \text { Yes } \\ 15 & 67 & 135 & \text { Yes } \\ 48 & 77 & 209 & \text { Yes } \\ 15 & 60 & 199 & \text { No } \\ 36 & 82 & 119 & \text { Yes } \\ 8 & 66 & 166 & \text { No } \\ 34 & 80 & 125 & \text { Yes } \\ 3 & 62 & 117 & \text { No } \\ 37 & 59 & 207 & \text { Yes } \end{array}$$ a. Develop an estimated regression equation that relates risk of a stroke to the person's age, blood pressure, and whether the person is a smoker. b. Is smoking a significant factor in the risk of a stroke? Explain. Use \(\alpha=.05\) c. What is the probability of a stroke over the next 10 years for Art Speen, a 68 -year-old smoker who has blood pressure of \(175 ?\) What action might the physician recommend for this patient?

The estimated regression equation for a model involving two independent variables and 10 observations follows. \\[\hat{y}=29.1270+.5906 x_{1}+.4980 x_{2}\\] a. Interpret \(b_{1}\) and \(b_{2}\) in this estimated regression equation. b. Estimate \(y\) when \(x_{1}=180\) and \(x_{2}=310\)

In exercise \(1,\) the following estimated regression equation based on 10 observations was presented. \\[ \begin{aligned} \hat{y} &=29.1270+.5906 x_{1}+.4980 x_{2} \\ \text { Here } \mathrm{SST}=6724.125, \mathrm{SSR} &=6216.375, s_{b_{1}}=.0813, \text { and } s_{b_{2}}=.0567 \end{aligned} \\] a. Compute MSR and MSE. b. Compute \(F\) and perform the appropriate \(F\) test. Use \(\alpha=.05\) c. Perform a \(t\) test for the significance of \(\beta_{1} .\) Use \(\alpha=.05\) d. Perform a \(t\) test for the significance of \(\beta_{2} .\) Use \(\alpha=.05\)

Consider a regression study involving a dependent variable \(y,\) a quantitative independent variable \(x_{1},\) and a qualitative variable with two levels (level 1 and level 2 ). a. Write a multiple regression equation relating \(x_{1}\) and the qualitative variable to \(y\) b. What is the expected value of \(y\) corresponding to level 1 of the qualitative variable? c. What is the expected value of \(y\) corresponding to level 2 of the qualitative variable? d. Interpret the parameters in your regression equation.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.