/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Consider the following hypothesi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider the following hypothesis test. $$\begin{array}{l} H_{0}: \mu_{d} \leq 0 \\ H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu_{d}>0 \end{array}$$ The following data are from matched samples taken from two populations. $$\begin{array}{ccc} & {\text { Population }} \\ \text { Element } & \mathbf{1} & \mathbf{2} \\ 1 & 21 & 20 \\ 2 & 28 & 26 \\ 3 & 18 & 18 \\ 4 & 20 & 20 \\ 5 & 26 & 24 \end{array}$$ a. Compute the difference value for each element. b. Compute \(\bar{d}\) c. Compute the standard deviation \(s_{d}\) d. Conduct a hypothesis test using \(\alpha=.05 .\) What is your conclusion?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Reject the null hypothesis; we have evidence that \( \mu_d > 0 \).

Step by step solution

01

Compute Difference Values

For each pair of values from Population 1 and Population 2, find the difference by subtracting the Population 2 value from the Population 1 value: - Element 1: \( 21 - 20 = 1 \) - Element 2: \( 28 - 26 = 2 \) - Element 3: \( 18 - 18 = 0 \) - Element 4: \( 20 - 20 = 0 \) - Element 5: \( 26 - 24 = 2 \). The differences are: 1, 2, 0, 0, 2.
02

Compute Mean Difference

Calculate the mean of the differences, \( \bar{d} \), using the formula: \[ \bar{d} = \frac{\sum{d}}{n} \] Here, \( \sum{d} = 1 + 2 + 0 + 0 + 2 = 5 \) and \( n = 5 \). So, \( \bar{d} = \frac{5}{5} = 1.0 \).
03

Compute Standard Deviation of Differences

Calculate the standard deviation of the differences, \( s_d \), using: \[ s_d = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (d - \bar{d})^2}{n-1}} \] First, find each \(d_i - \bar{d}\): - \( (1 - 1) = 0 \) - \( (2 - 1) = 1 \) - \( (0 - 1) = -1 \) - \( (0 - 1) = -1 \) - \( (2 - 1) = 1 \) Now, calculate \(\sum (d - \bar{d})^2\): \[ 0^2 + 1^2 + (-1)^2 + (-1)^2 + 1^2 = 0 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 4 \] Plug into the formula: \[ s_d = \sqrt{\frac{4}{4}} = \sqrt{1} = 1.0 \].
04

Conduct Hypothesis Test

To conduct the hypothesis test, first calculate the test statistic using: \[ t = \frac{\bar{d} - \mu_0}{s_d / \sqrt{n}} \] Here, \( \mu_0 = 0 \), so: \[ t = \frac{1 - 0}{1 / \sqrt{5}} = 2.236 \]. Next, determine the critical t-value for a one-tailed test with \(n-1=4\) degrees of freedom at \(\alpha = 0.05\), which is \(t_{critical} = 2.132\). Since \(t = 2.236 > 2.132\), we reject the null hypothesis \(H_0\).
05

Conclusion

Since the calculated t-value \(2.236\) is greater than the critical t-value \(2.132\), we reject the null hypothesis. This means there is sufficient evidence to support that the mean difference \( \mu_d \) is greater than 0.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mean Difference
When comparing two populations, we often look at the **mean difference** between paired samples. In this scenario, we have values from Population 1 and Population 2 for five different elements. To find the mean difference, we first compute the difference for each pair.
For example, for Element 1 we subtract the value from Population 2 from Population 1: 21 - 20 = 1. We repeat this for all elements, giving us the list of differences: 1, 2, 0, 0, 2.
Next, we calculate the average of these differences. The mean difference formula is:\[ \bar{d} = \frac{\sum{d}}{n} \]Here, \(\sum{d} = 5\), and \(n\) (the number of elements) is 5.
This means the mean difference \(\bar{d}\) is 1.0, which indicates that Population 1 tends to have slightly higher values than Population 2.
Standard Deviation
The **standard deviation** of differences helps us understand the variability among the differences. It's a measure of how much the individual differences \(d_i\) deviate from the mean difference \(\bar{d}\).
We start by figuring out how each difference compares to the mean difference. For example, with the differences (1, 2, 0, 0, 2) and \(\bar{d} = 1\), each element deviation \((d_i - \bar{d})\) is calculated: -1 for 0, 0 for 1, and 1 for 2.
We then square these deviations, sum them up, and divide by \(n-1\) (degrees of freedom) to get the variance.\[ s_d = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (d - \bar{d})^2}{n-1}} \]
By plugging the numbers, we find that \(s_d = 1.0\), indicating a relatively low variability among difference values.
Critical t-value
The **critical t-value** is a threshold determining the statistical significance in hypothesis testing. In our case, we're performing a one-tailed test to see if the mean difference \(\mu_d\) is greater than zero.
For this, we calculate the *t-statistic* using:\[ t = \frac{\bar{d} - \mu_0}{s_d / \sqrt{n}} \]where \(\mu_0\) (hypothesized mean difference) is 0. Our calculated t-statistic is 2.236, and to decide whether this result is statistically significant, we need the critical t-value from a t-distribution table for 4 degrees of freedom (\(n-1\)) at a significance level of 0.05.
This value is 2.132.
Since our calculated t-value exceeds this threshold, we have reason to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting a significant mean difference.
One-tailed Test
In hypothesis testing, a **one-tailed test** checks if a parameter is greater or less than a value. Here, we're testing if the mean difference \(\mu_d\) is greater than zero, leading us to a one-tailed test.
The hypotheses set up are:\[ H_{0}: \mu_{d} \leq 0 \text{ and } H_{a}: \mu_{d} > 0 \]
By focusing only on one direction (greater than), we require a strong enough test result (t-value) to reject the null hypothesis unequivocally.
This method is powerful when the hypothesis is in a specific direction, making our test precise and streamlining decision-making when the sample evidence supports the alternative hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Are nursing salaries in Tampa, Florida, lower than those in Dallas, Texas? Salary.com provided salary data showing staff nurses in Tampa earn less than staff nurses in Dallas (The Tampa Tribune, January 15,2007 ). Suppose that in a follow-up study of 40 staff nurses in Tampa and 50 staff nurses in Dallas you obtain the following results. $$\begin{array}{cc} \text { Tampa } & \text { Dallas } \\ n_{1}=40 & n_{2}=50 \\ \bar{x}_{1}=\$ 56,100 & \bar{x}_{2}=\$ 59,400 \\ s_{1}=\$ 6000 & s_{2}=\$ 7000 \end{array}$$ a. Formulate hypotheses so that, if the null hypothesis is rejected, we can conclude that salaries for staff nurses in Tampa are significantly lower than for those in Dallas. Use \(\alpha=.05\) b. What is the value of the test statistic? c. What is the \(p\) -value? d. What is your conclusion?

Consider the following data for two independent random samples taken from two normal populations. $$\begin{array}{l|rrrrrr} \text { Sample 1 } & 10 & 7 & 13 & 7 & 9 & 8 \\ \hline \text { Sample 2 } & 8 & 7 & 8 & 4 & 6 & 9 \end{array}$$ a. Compute the two sample means. b. Compute the two sample standard deviations. c. What is the point estimate of the difference between the two population means? d. What is the \(90 \%\) confidence interval estimate of the difference between the two population means?

StreetInsider.com reported 2002 earnings per share data for a sample of major companies (February 12,2003 ). Prior to 2002 , financial analysts predicted the 2002 earnings per share for these same companies (Barron's, September 10,2001 ). Use the following data to comment on differences between actual and estimated earnings per share. $$\begin{array}{lcc} \text { Company } & \text { Actual } & \text { Predicted } \\ \text { AT\&T } & 1.29 & 0.38 \\ \text { American Express } & 2.01 & 2.31 \\ \text { Citigroup } & 2.59 & 3.43 \\ \text { Coca-Cola } & 1.60 & 1.78 \\ \text { DuPont } & 1.84 & 2.18 \\ \text { ExxonMobil } & 2.72 & 2.19 \\ \text { General Electric } & 1.51 & 1.71 \\ \text { Johnson \& Johnson } & 2.28 & 2.18 \\ \text { McDonald's } & 0.77 & 1.55 \\ \text { Wal-Mart } & 1.81 & 1.74 \end{array}$$ a. Use \(\alpha=.05\) and test for any difference between the population mean actual and population mean estimated earnings per share. What is the \(p\) -value? What is your conclusion? b. What is the point estimate of the difference between the two means? Did the analysts tend to underestimate or overestimate the earnings? c. At \(95 \%\) confidence, what is the margin of error for the estimate in part (b)? What would you recommend based on this information?

A study reported in the Journal of Small Business Management concluded that selfemployed individuals do not experience higher job satisfaction than individuals who are not self-employed. In this study, job satisfaction is measured using 18 items, each of which is rated using a Likert-type scale with \(1-5\) response options ranging from strong agreement to strong disagreement. A higher score on this scale indicates a higher degree of job satisfaction. The sum of the ratings for the 18 items, ranging from \(18-90\), is used as the measure of job satisfaction. Suppose that this approach was used to measure the job satisfaction for lawyers, physical therapists, cabinetmakers, and systems analysts. The results obtained for a sample of 10 individuals from each profession follow. $$\begin{array}{cccc} \text { Lawyer } & \text { Physical Therapist } & \text { Cabinetmaker } & \text { Systems Analyst } \\ 44 & 55 & 54 & 44 \\ 42 & 78 & 65 & 73 \\ 74 & 80 & 79 & 71 \\ 42 & 86 & 69 & 60 \\ 53 & 60 & 79 & 64 \\ 50 & 59 & 64 & 66 \\ 45 & 62 & 59 & 41 \\ 48 & 52 & 78 & 55 \\ 64 & 55 & 84 & 76 \\ 38 & 50 & 60 & 62 \end{array}$$ At the \(\alpha=.05\) level of significance, test for any difference in the job satisfaction among the four professions.

Arnold Palmer and Tiger Woods are two of the best golfers to ever play the game. To show how these two golfers would compare if both were playing at the top of their game, the following sample data provide the results of 18 -hole scores during a PGA tournament competition. Palmer's scores are from his 1960 season, while Woods' scores are from his 1999 season (Golf Magazine, February 2000). $$Palmer, 1960 \quad Woods, 1999$$ $$ \begin{array}{ll} n_{1}=112 & n_{2}=84 \\ \bar{x}_{1}=69.95 & \bar{x}_{2}=69.56 \end{array} $$ Use the sample results to test the hypothesis of no difference between the population mean 18-hole scores for the two golfers. a. Assume a population standard deviation of 2.5 for both golfers. What is the value of the test statistic? b. What is the \(p\) -value? c. \(\quad\) At \(\alpha=.01,\) what is your conclusion?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.