/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 For Exercises 2 through \(12,\) ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For Exercises 2 through \(12,\) perform each of these steps. Assume that all variables are normally or approximately normally distributed. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value(s). c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Cholesterol Levels A medical researcher wishes to see if he can lower the cholesterol levels through diet in 6 people by showing a film about the effects of high cholesterol levels. The data are shown. At \(\alpha=0.05,\) did the cholesterol level decrease on average? $$ \begin{array}{lllllll}\hline \text { Patient } & {1} & {2} & {3} & {4} & {5} & {6} \\ \hline \text { Before } & {243} & {216} & {214} & {222} & {206} & {219} \\ \hline \text { After } & {215} & {202} & {198} & {195} & {204} & {213}\end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, there is evidence that the film lowers cholesterol levels.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

To determine whether the film effectively lowers cholesterol levels, we formulate the hypotheses. The null hypothesis \(H_0\) is that there is no decrease in cholesterol levels on average, expressed as \(\mu_d = 0\). The alternative hypothesis \(H_1\) is that the cholesterol levels do decrease on average, expressed as \(\mu_d > 0\). Here, \(\mu_d\) represents the mean of the differences between the 'Before' and 'After' measurements.
02

Identify the Claim

The researcher's claim is that the cholesterol levels decreased after showing the film, which aligns with the alternative hypothesis \(H_1: \mu_d > 0\).
03

Find the Critical Value

Using a significance level \(\alpha = 0.05\) for a one-tailed test, we find the critical value for \(t\) with \(n-1 = 5\) degrees of freedom. From the t-distribution table, the critical value is approximately 2.015.
04

Compute the Test Value

Calculate the differences between the cholesterol levels before and after: \(d = \text{Before} - \text{After} = [28, 14, 16, 27, 2, 6]\). The mean of the differences \(\bar{d}\) is \(93/6 = 15.5\). The standard deviation of the differences \(s_d\) is calculated as follows: \[s_d = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (d_i - \bar{d})^2}{n - 1}} = \sqrt{\frac{(12.5)^2 + (-1.5)^2 + (0.5)^2 + (11.5)^2 + (-13.5)^2 + (-9.5)^2}{5}} \approx 9.5026\]The test statistic \(t\) is computed as:\[t = \frac{\bar{d} - 0}{s_d / \sqrt{n}} = \frac{15.5 - 0}{9.5026 / \sqrt{6}} \approx 3.868\]
05

Make the Decision

Compare the test statistic with the critical value. Since our calculated \(t\) value of 3.868 is greater than the critical value of 2.015, we reject the null hypothesis \(H_0\).
06

Summarize the Results

There is sufficient evidence at the \(\alpha = 0.05\) significance level to support the claim that showing the film decreases cholesterol levels on average.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

t-test
The t-test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two groups. In our scenario, we used a paired t-test because we are comparing cholesterol levels before and after a specific intervention (showing a film). Here, the scores are paired naturally because they come from the same individuals measured at two different times.

The test helps us to understand if the difference we observe in the sample data is due to chance or if it's statistically significant. To conduct a t-test, we calculate the mean difference, the standard deviation of differences, and use these in a formula to find our test statistic. This calculated test value helps us make a decision about our hypotheses.
significance level
The significance level, denoted by \(\alpha\), is a threshold set by the researcher to decide when to reject the null hypothesis. In this exercise, \(\alpha = 0.05\), meaning we are willing to accept a 5% chance of being wrong when we claim there is an effect when there isn't one.

A smaller \(\alpha\) value means we are more conservative and strict when assessing evidence against the null hypothesis. However, in most standard tests like ours, 0.05 is commonly used as it strikes a balance between overstating or understating statistical results.
critical value
The critical value is a point on the test distribution that is compared with the test statistic to determine the outcome of the test. Depending on the test and significance level (uffff0.05f), we find this value using a t-distribution table based on the degrees of freedom, which is c3"n-1" for a t-test.

In our example, the degrees of freedom is 5 (from 6 samples, or \(6-1\)). With a one-tailed test approach, as we are interested in decreases only, the critical value is 2.015. If our calculated statistic exceeds this critical value, we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
null hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), serves as a starting point for our statistical test. It represents the default position that there is no effect or no difference. For the cholesterol level exercise, the null hypothesis states that the mean difference between the 'Before' and 'After' cholesterol measurements is zero, i.e., \(\mu_d = 0\).

Essentially, the null hypothesis suggests that the intervention (watching the film) does not affect cholesterol levels. Our goal is to test this hypothesis and determine whether it can be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
alternative hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)) is contrary to the null hypothesis. It indicates the presence of an effect or a difference. In our scenario, the alternative hypothesis states that the mean difference is greater than zero (i.e., \(\mu_d > 0\)), suggesting that the film does indeed help in lowering cholesterol levels.

This hypothesis is what the researcher aims to prove. If our test statistic surpasses the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Therefore, in this exercise, concluding that \(H_1\) is true means there is significant evidence to suggest that the film showing lowers cholesterol levels on average.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For Exercises 2 through \(12,\) perform each of these steps. Assume that all variables are normally or approximately normally distributed. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value(s). c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Pulse Rates of Identical Twins A researcher wanted to compare the pulse rates of identical twins to see whether there was any difference. Eight sets of twins were randomly selected. The rates are given in the table as number of beats per minute. At \(\alpha=0.01,\) is there a significant difference in the average pulse rates of twins? Use the \(P\) -value method. Find the \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the difference of the two. $$ \begin{array}{l|cccccccc}{\text { Twin } \mathbf{A}} & {87} & {92} & {78} & {83} & {88} & {90} & {84} & {93} \\ \hline \text { Twin B } & {83} & {95} & {79} & {83} & {86} & {93} & {80} & {86}\end{array} $$

Manual Dexterity Differences A researcher wishes to see if there is a difference in the manual dexterity of athletes and that of band members. Two random samples of 30 are selected from each group and are given a manual dexterity test. The mean of the athletes test was \(87,\) and the mean of the band members' test was \(92 .\) The population standard deviation for the test is \(7.2 .\) At \(\alpha=0.01,\) is there a significant difference in the mean scores?

Commuting Times The U.S. Census Bureau reports that the average commuting time for citizens of both Baltimore, Maryland, and Miami, Florida, is approximately 29 minutes. To see if their commuting times appear to be any different in the winter, random samples of 40 drivers were surveyed in each city and the average commuting time for the month of January was calculated for both cities. The results are shown. At the 0.05 level of significance, can it be concluded that the commuting times are different in the winter? $$ \begin{array}{lcc}{} & {\text { Miami }} & {\text { Baltimore }} \\ \hline \text { Sample size } & {40} & {40} \\ {\text { Sample mean }} & {28.5 \min } & {35.2 \mathrm{min}} \\ {\text { Population standard deviation }} & {7.2 \mathrm{min}} & {9.1 \mathrm{min}}\end{array} $$

Weights of Running Shoes The weights in ounces of a sample of running shoes for men and women are shown. Test the claim that the means are different. Use the \(P\) -value method with \(\alpha=0.05 .\) $$ \begin{array}{ll|ccc}{\text { Men }} & {} & {\text { Women }} & {} \\ \hline 10.4 & {12.6} & {10.6} & {10.2} & {8.8} \\ {1.1} & {14.7} & {9.6} & {9.5} & {9.5} \\ {10.8} & {12.9} & {10.1} & {11.2} & {9.3} \\ {11.7} & {13.3} & {9.4} & {10.3} & {9.5} \\ {12.8} & {14.5} & {9.8} & {10.3} & {11.0} \\\ \hline\end{array} $$

Hours Spent Watching Television According to Nielsen Media Research, children (ages 2-11) spend an average of 21 hours 30 minutes watching television per week while teens (ages 12-17) spend an average of 20 hours 40 minutes. Based on the sample statistics shown, is there sufficient evidence to conclude a difference in average television watching times between the two groups? Use \(\alpha=0.01 .\) $$ \begin{array}{lcc}{} & {\text { Children }} & {\text { Teens }} \\ \hline \text { Sample mean } & {22.45} & {18.50} \\ {\text { Sample variance }} & {16.4} & {18.2} \\ {\text { Sample size }} & {15} & {15}\end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.