/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 For Exercises I through 25, perf... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For Exercises I through 25, perform each of the following steps. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value(s). c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use diagrams to show the critical region (or regions), and use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Heights of 1-Year-olds The average 1 -year-old (both genders) is 29 inches tall. A random sample of 301 -year-olds in a large day care franchise resulted in the following heights. At \(\alpha=0.05,\) can it be concluded that the average height differs from 29 inches? Assume \(\sigma=2.61\) $$ \begin{array}{lllllllllll}{25} & {32} & {35} & {25} & {30} & {26.5} & {26} & {25.5} & {29.5} & {32} \\ {30} & {28.5} & {30} & {32} & {28} & {31.5} & {29} & {29.5} & {30} & {34} \\ {29} & {32} & {27} & {28} & {33} & {28} & {27} & {32} & {29} & {29.5}\end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is no evidence the average height differs from 29 inches.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses and Identify the Claim

We need to test whether the average height of 1-year-olds differs from 29 inches. Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses: - Null hypothesis (H_0): \( \mu = 29 \)- Alternative hypothesis (H_1): \( \mu eq 29 \)The claim is the alternative hypothesis stating that the average height is different from 29 inches.
02

Find the Critical Value(s)

Since the population standard deviation is known and we are dealing with a large sample (n > 30), use the Z distribution. For a two-tailed test with \( \alpha = 0.05 \), look up the Z-score that cuts off the top 2.5% and bottom 2.5% of the distribution. These critical values are \( \pm 1.96 \).
03

Compute the Test Value

First, calculate the sample mean:- Sum of all sample values: \( 25 + 32 + 35 + 25 + 30 + 26.5 + 26 + 25.5 + 29.5 + 32 + 30 + 28.5 + 30 + 32 + 28 + 31.5 + 29 + 29.5 + 30 + 34 + 29 + 32 + 27 + 28 + 33 + 28 + 27 + 32 + 29 + 29.5 = 868 \)- Sample mean (\bar{x}): \( \frac{868}{30} = 28.933 \)Calculate the Z-test value using the formula: \[ z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}} \]Substitute in the values: \( \bar{x} = 28.933 \), \( \mu = 29 \), \( \sigma = 2.61 \), \( n = 30 \).\[ z = \frac{28.933 - 29}{2.61/\sqrt{30}} = \frac{-0.067}{0.4762} \approx -0.14 \]
04

Make the Decision

Compare the computed Z-test value \( -0.14 \) to the critical values \( \pm 1.96 \). Since \( -0.14 \) lies between \( -1.96 \) and \( 1.96 \), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
05

Summarize the Results

At the \( \alpha = 0.05 \) significance level, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the average height of 1-year-olds differs from 29 inches. The data does not support the claim that the average height is different from 29 inches.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often denoted as \( H_0 \), is a critical concept in statistics. It represents a statement of no effect or no difference which we seek to test against.
In the context of our exercise, the null hypothesis is that the average height of 1-year-olds is 29 inches. Mathematically, this can be written as \( \mu = 29 \).
The null hypothesis serves as a starting point for statistical inference. Generally, it is assumed to be true until there is enough evidence to prove otherwise, through hypothesis testing.
  • The null hypothesis is what we attempt to disprove or reject.
  • It establishes a baseline or default condition.
Understanding the null hypothesis is crucial as it influences the setup, analysis, and conclusions of the hypothesis test.
Alternative Hypothesis
Opposite the null hypothesis stands the alternative hypothesis, often symbolized as \( H_1 \) or \( H_a \). It proposes a different statement from the null, one that researchers aim to support through the collected data.
In our exercise, the alternative hypothesis claims that the average height of 1-year-olds is not equal to 29 inches, \( \mu eq 29 \).
The alternative hypothesis represents a new effect or difference that may impact decision-making based on statistical analysis.
  • It is what researchers suspect might be true.
  • Statistical tests determine if there is enough evidence in the sample to "reject" the null in favor of \( H_1 \).
Accepting the alternative hypothesis implies the presence of statistically significant results, suggesting a deviation from the null hypothesis.
Critical Value
Critical values are pivotal points on the probability distribution that help determine the boundary for rejecting the null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, they define the cutoff region (or critical region) beyond which we consider the result statistically significant.
The exercise employs a two-tailed test with a significance level of \( \alpha = 0.05 \). For a standard normal distribution, this significance level corresponds to critical values of \( \pm 1.96 \).
  • If the test statistic falls beyond this range, it suggests rejecting the null hypothesis.
  • They are derived from statistical tables or software, depending on the test being used.
Understanding critical values is vital to evaluate if the obtained test statistic supports or contradicts the null hypothesis.
Z-test
The Z-test is a type of hypothesis test that is particularly useful when the population variance is known and the sample size is large (n > 30).
For our exercise, given the sample size of 30 and known population standard deviation \( \sigma = 2.61 \), a Z-test helps determine if the sample mean significantly differs from the population mean.
We calculate the Z value using the formula: \[ z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}} \]- \( \bar{x} \) is the sample mean.- \( \mu \) is the population mean under the null hypothesis.- \( \sigma \) is the population standard deviation.- \( n \) is the sample size.Evaluating the Z value against critical values determines whether to reject \( H_0 \). A Z-test allows statisticians to assess hypotheses about the population from which a sample is drawn.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For Exercises I through 25, perform each of the following steps. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value(s). c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use diagrams to show the critical region (or regions), and use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Medical School Applications A medical college dean read that the average number of applications a potential medical school student sends is 7.8 . She thinks that the mean is higher. So she selects a random sample of 35 applicants and asks each how many medical schools they applied to. The mean of the sample is \(8.7 .\) The population standard deviation is \(2.6 .\) Test her claim at \(\alpha=0.01 .\)

For Exercises I through 25, perform each of the following steps. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value(s). c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use diagrams to show the critical region (or regions), and use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Daily Driving The average number of miles a person drives per day is \(24 .\) A researcher wishes to see if people over age 60 drive less than 24 miles per day. She selects a random sample of 49 drivers over the age of 60 and finds that the mean number of miles driven is 22.8. The population standard deviation is 3.5 miles. At \(\alpha=0.05\) is there sufficient evidence that those drivers over 60 years old drive less on average than 24 miles per day?

Find the critical value (or values) for the \(t\) test for each. a. \(n=15, \alpha=0.05,\) right-tailed b. \(n=23, \alpha=0.005,\) left-tailed c. \(n=28, \alpha=0.01,\) two-tailed d. \(n=17, \alpha=0.02,\) two-tailed

Working at Home Workers with a formal arrangement with their employer to be paid for time worked at home worked an average of 19 hours per week. A random sample of 15 mortgage brokers indicated that they worked a mean of 21.3 hours per week at home with a standard deviation of 6.5 hours. At $$\alpha=0.05,$$ is there sufficient evidence to conclude a difference? Construct a $$95 \%$$ confidence interval for the true mean number of paid working hours at home. Compare the results of your confidence interval to the conclusion of your hypothesis test and discuss the implications.

Prison Time According to a public service website, $$69.4 \%$$ of white collar criminals get prison time. A randomly selected sample of 165 white collar criminals revealed that 120 were serving or had served prison time. Using $$\alpha=0.05,$$ test the conjecture that the proportion of white collar criminals serving prison time differs from $$69.4 \%$$ in two different ways.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.