/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.10.85 Schizophrenia and Dopamine. Prev... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Schizophrenia and Dopamine. Previous research has suggested that changes in the activity of dopamine, a neurotransmitter

in the brain, maybe a causative factor for schizophrenia. In the paper "Schizophrenia: Dopamine β-Hydroxylase Activity and Treatment Response" (Science, Vol. 216, pp. 1423-1425), D. Sternberg et al. published the results of their study in which they examined 25schizophrenic patients who had been classified as either psychotic or not psychotic by hospital staff. The activity of dopamine was measured in each patient by using the enzyme dopamine β-hydroxylase to assess differences in dopamine activity between the two groups. The following are the data, in nanomoles per milliliter-hour per milligram ( nmol/mL-hr/mg).


At the 1%significance level, do the data suggest that dopamine activity is higher, on average, in psychotic patients? (Note: x¯1=0.02426, s1=0.00514,x2=0.01643, and s2=0.00470.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The interval is0.235to7.165.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

Given data:

02

Explanation

Null hypothesis H0:μ1=μ2

Alternative hypothesis H1: μ1>μ2

Test Statistic:

t=x¯1-x¯2n1s12+n2s22n1+n2-2(1n1+1n2)

Since n1=10and n2=15

small samples apply t test

t=0.02426-0.0164310×0.005142+15×0.00470210+15-2(110+115)=0.007830.0002642+0.000331423(0.167)=0.007830.000004325=0.007830.002079=3.7662

Table value at 1% level of significance

df=n1+n2-2=10+15-2=23

ta=1.319

Since calculated value is greater than table value. We reject the null hypothesis is localid="1654774693748" H1:μ1>μ2.

There is significance difference between means.

The endpoint of the interval are,

x¯1-x¯2±ta2·s12n1+s22n2=(48.5-33.7)±2.787·9.2232+5.7220

=0.235to7.165

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

V. Tangpricha et al. did a study to determine whether fortifying orange juice with Vitamin D would result in changes in the blood levels of five biochemical variables. One of those variables was the concentration of parathyroid hormone (PTH), measured in picograms/milliliter ( pg/ml ). The researchers published their results in the paper "Fortification of Orange Juice with Vitamin D: A Novel Approach for Enhancing Vitamin D Nutritional Health" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, pp. 1478-1483). Concentration levels were recorded at the beginning of the experiment and again at the end of 12weeks. The following data, based on the results of the study, provide the decrease (negative values indicate an increase) in PTH levels, in pg/ml, for those drinking the fortified juice and for those drinking the unfortified juice.

At the 5% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that drinking fortified orange juice reduces PTH level more than drinking unfortified orange juice? (Note: The mean and standard deviation for the data on fortified juice are 9.0pg/mL and 37.4pg/mL, respectively, and for the data on unfortified juice, they are 1.6pg/mLand34.6pg/mL, respectively.)

In the paper "The Relation of Sex and Sense of Direction to Spatial Orientation in an Unfamiliar Environment" (Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 20, pp. 17-28), J. Sholl et al. published the results of examining the sense of direction of 30 male and 30 female students. After being taken to an unfamiliar wooded park, the students were given some spatial orientation tests, including pointing to the south, which tested their absolute frame of reference. The students pointed by moving a pointer attached to a 360°protractor. Following are the absolute pointing errors, in degrees, of the participants.

At the 1% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that, on average, males have a better sense of direction and, in particular, a better frame of reference than females? (Note: x¯1=37.6,s1=38.5,x¯2=55.8,ands2=48.3.)

Faculty Salaries. Suppose, for example10.2, you want to decide whether the mean salary of faculty in private institutions is greater than the mean salary of faculty in public institutions. State the null and alternative hypotheses for that hypothesis test.

Left-Tailed Hypothesis Tests and CIs. If the assumptions for a pooled t-interval are satisfied, the formula for a (1-α)-level upper confidence bound for the difference, μ1-μ2, between two population means is

x¯1-x~2+ta·Sp1/n1+1/n2

For a left-tailed hypothesis test at the significance level α, the null hypothesis H0:μ1=μ2will be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis Ha:μ1<μ2if and only if the (1-α)-level upper confidence bound for μ1-μ2is less than or equal to 0. In each case, illustrate the preceding relationship by obtaining the appropriate upper confidence bound and comparing the result to the conclusion of the hypothesis test in the specified exercise.

a. Exercise 10.45

b. Exercise 10.46

10.34 Explain why sp is called the pooled sample standard deviation.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.