/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 19 Ertugrul et al. conducted a stud... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Ertugrul et al. conducted a study to determine the association between insulin growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and bone mineral density (BMD) in men over \(65\) years of age. The researchers published their results in the paper "Relationship Between Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 and Bone Mineral Density in Men Aged over \(65\) Years". Forty-one men over \(65\) years old were enrolled in the study as was a control group consisting of \(20\) younger men, ages \(19-62\) years. On the WeissStats site, we provide data on IGF-1 levels, based on the results of the study. Use the technology of your choice to do the following.

a. Obtain normal probability plots, boxplots and the standard deviation for the two samples

b. Based on your results from part (a), which are preferable here, pooled or non-pooled \(t-\)procedure? Explain your reasoning.

c. At the \(1%\) significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that on average men over \(65\) have a lower IGF-1 level than younger men?

d. Find and interpret a \(99%\) confidence interval for the difference between the mean IGF-1 levels of men over \(65\) and younger men.

e. Are your procedures in part (c) and (d) justified? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part a. \(36.6349\)

\(84.8438\)

Part b. non-pooled t-procedures.

Part c.There is sufficient proof at\(1%\) significance level that men over \(65\) have a lower IGF-1 level than younger men.

Part d. \((-150.3370, -38.6166)\)

Part e. No

Step by step solution

01

Part a. Step 1. Explanation

Normal Probability Plot

Box Plot:

The mean of two samples can be calculated as:

\(\bar{x_{1}}=\frac{1135+81+..+91+106}{41}=102.0732\)

\(\bar{x_{2}}=\frac{229+172+..+217+233}{20}=196.55\)

\(s_{1}=\sqrt{\frac{(135-102.0732)^{2}+(81-102.0732)^{2}+..+(106-102.0732)^{2}}{41-1}}\approx 36.6349\)

\(s_{2}=\sqrt{\frac{(229-196.55)^{2}+(1172.3-196.55)^{2}+..+(233-196.55)^{2}}{20-1}}\approx 84.8438\)

02

Part b. Step 1. Explanation

It can be noted from part (a) that the standard deviation of second sample is teice of the standard deviation of first sample. Therefore, the standard deviations of the two sample are approximately not equal. Therefore, the standard deviations of the the two populations are not approximately not equal either.

As, they are different, non-pooled t-procedures are preferred.

03

Part c. Step 1. Explanation

Calculate the test-statistic as per follows:

Calculate the degrees of freedom:

As the P-value is less than the significance level, therefore the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, there is sufficient proof at\(1%\) significance level that men over \(65\) have a lower IGF-1 level than younger men.

04

Part d. Step 1. Explanation

Calculate the degrees of freedom:

Now, calculate the t-value for \(t_{\frac{(1-c}{2}}=t_{\frac{(1-0.99)}{2}}=t_{0.005}\)

\(t_{\frac{\alpha}{2}}=2.819\)

Therefore, the margin of error is

The endpoints for confidence interval is

\((-150.3370, -38.6166)\)

05

Part e. Step 1. Explanation

From Box-Plot in part (a), it can be seen that there is an outlier and they strongly influence \(t-\)procedure, therefore the results in part (c) and (d) can not be justified.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In each of Exercises 10.35-10.38, we have provided summary statistics for independent simple random samples from two populations. Preliminary data analyses indicate that the variable under consideration is normally distributed on each population. Decide, in each case, whether use of the pooled t-lest and pooled t-interval procedure is reasonable. Explain your answer.

10.36 x¯1=115.1,s1=79.4,n1=51
x¯2=24.3,s2=10.5,n2=19


In each of Exercises 10.75-10.80, we have provided summary statistics for independent simple random samples from non populations. In each case, use the non pooled t-test and the non pooled t-interval procedure to conduct the required hypothesis test and obtain the specified confidence interval.

x¯1=15,s1=2,n1=15,x¯2=12,s2=5andn2=15.

a. Two-tailed test, α=0.05

b. 95%confidence interval.

Faculty Salaries. Suppose, for Example10.2, you want to decide whether the mean salary of faculty in private institutions is less than the mean salary of faculty in public institutions. State the null and alternative hypotheses for that hypothesis test.

V. Tangpricha et al. did a study to determine whether fortifying orange juice with Vitamin D would result in changes in the blood levels of five biochemical variables. One of those variables was the concentration of parathyroid hormone (PTH), measured in picograms/milliliter ( pg/ml ). The researchers published their results in the paper "Fortification of Orange Juice with Vitamin D: A Novel Approach for Enhancing Vitamin D Nutritional Health" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, pp. 1478-1483). Concentration levels were recorded at the beginning of the experiment and again at the end of 12weeks. The following data, based on the results of the study, provide the decrease (negative values indicate an increase) in PTH levels, in pg/ml, for those drinking the fortified juice and for those drinking the unfortified juice.

At the 5% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that drinking fortified orange juice reduces PTH level more than drinking unfortified orange juice? (Note: The mean and standard deviation for the data on fortified juice are 9.0pg/mL and 37.4pg/mL, respectively, and for the data on unfortified juice, they are 1.6pg/mLand34.6pg/mL, respectively.)

In each of exercise 10.13-10.18, we have presented a confidence interval for the difference,μ1-μ2, between two population means. interpret each confidence interval.

95% CI is from15to20

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.