/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}

91影视

Coke and Diet Coke Data Set 26 鈥淐ola Weights and Volumes鈥 in Appendix B includes theweights (in pounds) of cola for a sample of cans of regular Coke (n = 36, \(\bar x\)= 0.81682 lb,s = 0.00751 lb) and the weights of cola for a sample of cans of Diet Coke (n = 36, \(\bar x\) =0.78479 lb, s = 0.00439 lb). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that variation is thesame for both types of Coke.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim that the population variance of the regular coke group is different from the population variance of the diet coke group.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

For a sample of 36 cans of regular Coke, the mean weight of cola is equal to 0.81682 lb, and the standard deviation is equal to 0.00751 lb. For another sample of 36 cans of Diet Coke, the mean weight of cola is equal to 0.78479 lb,and the standard deviation is equal to 0.00439 lb.

It is claimed that the variation in the amount of cola for the regular Coke is equal to the variation in the amount of Cola for the Diet Coke.

02

Hypotheses

Let\({\sigma _1}\)and\({\sigma _2}\)be the population standard deviations of the weight of colafor the regular Coke and the Diet Cokerespectively.

Null Hypothesis:The populationstandard deviationof the weight of colafor the regular Cokeis equal to the population standard deviation of the weight of colafor the Diet Coke.

Symbolically,

\({H_0}:{\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)

Alternative Hypothesis:The populationstandard deviationof the weight of colafor the regular Cokeis not equal to the population standard deviationof the weight of colafor the Diet Coke.

Symbolically,

\({H_1}:{\sigma _1} \ne {\sigma _2}\)

03

Compute the test statistic

Since two independent samples involve a claim about the population standard deviation, apply an F-test.

Consider the larger sample variance to be\(s_1^2\)and the corresponding sample size to be\({n_1}\).

The following values are obtained:

\({\left( {0.00751} \right)^2} = 0.000056\)

\({\left( {0.00439} \right)^2} = 0.000019\)

Here,\(s_1^2\)is the sample variance corresponding to the regular Coke has a value equal to 0.000056 lb squared.

\(s_2^2\)is the sample variance corresponding to the Diet Cokeand has a value equal to 0.000019 lb squared.

Substitute the respective values to calculate the F statistic:

\(\begin{array}{c}F = \frac{{{{\left( {0.00751} \right)}^2}}}{{{{\left( {0.00439} \right)}^2}}}\\ = 2.927\end{array}\)

Thus, F is equal to 2.927.

04

Critical value and p-value

The value of the numerator degrees of freedom is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_1} - 1 = 36 - 1\\ = 35\end{array}\)

The value of the denominator degrees of freedom is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_2} - 1 = 36 - 1\\ = 35\end{array}\)

For the F test, the critical value corresponding to the right-tail is considered.

The critical value can be obtained using the F-distribution table with numerator degrees of freedom equal to 35 and denominator degrees of freedom equal to 35 for a right-tailed test.

The level of significance is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{\alpha }{2} = \frac{{0.05}}{2}\\ = 0.025\end{array}\)

Thus, the critical value is equal to 1.9611.

The two-tailed p-value for F equal to 2.927 is equal to 0.0020.

05

Conclusion

Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Thus, there is enough evidence to rejectthe claimthat variation is the same for both types of Coke.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting Displays.

In Exercises 5 and 6, use the results from the given displays.

Treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common wrist complaintresulting from a compressed nerve, and it is often the result of extended use of repetitive wristmovements, such as those associated with the use of a keyboard. In a randomized controlledtrial, 73 patients were treated with surgery and 67 were found to have successful treatments.Among 83 patients treated with splints, 60 were found to have successful treatments (based ondata from 鈥淪plinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome,鈥 by Gerritsenet al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 288, No. 10). Use the accompanyingStatCrunch display with a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the success rate is better with surgery.

esting Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Accuracy of Fast Food Drive-Through Orders In a study of Burger King drive-through orders, it was found that 264 orders were accurate and 54 were not accurate. For McDonald鈥檚, 329 orders were found to be accurate while 33 orders were not accurate (based on data from QSR magazine). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Burger King and McDonald鈥檚 have the same accuracy rates.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Relative to accuracy of orders, does either restaurant chain appear to be better?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Cell Phones and Handedness A study was conducted to investigate the association between cell phone use and hemispheric brain dominance. Among 216 subjects who prefer to use their left ear for cell phones, 166 were right-handed. Among 452 subjects who prefer to use their right ear for cell phones, 436 were right-handed (based on data from 鈥淗emi- spheric Dominance and Cell Phone Use,鈥 by Seidman et al., JAMA Otolaryngology鈥擧ead & Neck Surgery, Vol. 139, No. 5). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of right-handedness for those who prefer to use their left ear for cell phones is less than the rate of right-handedness for those who prefer to use their right ear for cell phones. (Try not to get too confused here.)

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Dreaming in Black and White A study was conducted to determine the proportion of people who dream in black and white instead of color. Among 306 people over the age of 55, 68 dream in black and white, and among 298 people under the age of 25, 13 dream in black and white (based on data from 鈥淒o We Dream in Color?鈥 by Eva Murzyn, Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 17, No. 4). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the proportion of people over 55 who dream in black and white is greater than the proportion of those under 25.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. An explanation given for the results is that those over the age of 55 grew up exposed to media that was mostly displayed in black and white. Can the results from parts (a) and (b) be used to verify that explanation?

Does Aspirin Prevent Heart Disease? In a trial designed to test the effectiveness of aspirin in preventing heart disease, 11,037 male physicians were treated with aspirin and 11,034 male physicians were given placebos. Among the subjects in the aspirin treatment group, 139 experienced myocardial infarctions (heart attacks). Among the subjects given placebos, 239 experienced myocardial infarctions (based on data from 鈥淔inal Report on the Aspirin Component of the Ongoing Physicians鈥 Health Study,鈥 New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 321: 129鈥135). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that aspirin has no effect on myocardial infarctions.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does aspirin appear to be effective?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.