/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q9BSC Testing Claims About Variation. ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Testing Claims About Variation. In Exercises 5鈥16, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Assume that a simple random sample is selected from a normally distributed population.

Cola Cans A random sample of 20 aluminum cola cans with thickness 0.0109 in. is selected and the axial loads are measured and the standard deviation is 18.6 lb. The axial load is the pressure applied to the top that causes the can to crush. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that cans with thickness 0.0109 in. have axial loads with the same standard deviation as the axial loads of cans that are 0.0111 in. thick. The thicker cans have axial loads with a standard deviation of 27.8 lb (based on Data Set 30 鈥淎luminum Cans鈥 in Appendix B). Does the thickness of the cans appear to affect the variation of the axial loads?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Hypotheses for the claim:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{H}}_0}:\sigma = 27.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\{{\rm{H}}_1}:\sigma \ne 27.8\end{array}\)

The test statistic is 8.505.

The critical values are obtained as 8.907 and 32.852.

The null hypothesis is rejected at a 0.05 level of significance. Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim.

It can be stated that the thickness of the cans appears to affect the variation of the axial loads.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A random sample of 20 aluminum cola cans with athickness of 0.0109 in measured for the axial loads has astandard deviation of 18.6 lb.

The significance level is 0.05.

The claim to be tested is that the axial load standard deviation for cans with a thickness of 0.0109 in is the same as the cans with a thickness of 0.0111 in.

02

Describe the hypothesis testing

For applying the hypothesis test, first, set up a null and an alternative hypothesis.

The null hypothesis is the statement about the value of a population parameter, which is equal to the claimed value. It is denoted by\({H_0}\).

The alternate hypothesis is a statement that the parameter has a value opposite to the null hypothesis. It is denoted by\({H_1}\).

03

State the null and alternative hypotheses

The claim is that cans with a thickness of 0.0109 in have axial loads with the same standard deviation\(\left( \sigma \right)\)of 27.8 lb.

From the claim, the null and alternative hypotheses are as follows.

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{H}}_0}:\sigma = 27.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\{{\rm{H}}_1}:\sigma \ne 27.8\end{array}\)

Here, \(\sigma \) is the measure of standard deviation for axial loads with a thickness of 0.0109 in.

04

Find the test statistic

To conduct a hypothesis test of a claim about a population standard deviation\(\sigma \) or population variance\({\sigma ^2}\),the test statistic is stated as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}{\chi ^2} = \frac{{\left( {{\rm{n}} - 1} \right) \times {s^2}}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\\ = \frac{{\left( {20 - 1} \right) \times {{18.6}^2}}}{{{{27.8}^2}}}\\ = 8.5053\end{array}\).

Thus, the value of the test statistic is 8.5053.

05

Find the critical value

For a two-sided hypothesis, divide the\(\alpha \)equally between two tails as\(\frac{\alpha }{2}\)and\(1 - \frac{\alpha }{2}\).

Mathematically,

\(P\left( {{\chi ^2} < \chi _{\frac{\alpha }{2}}^2} \right) = 1 - \frac{\alpha }{2}\)and

\(P\left( {{\chi ^2} > \chi _{\frac{\alpha }{2}}^2} \right) = \frac{\alpha }{2}\).

Referring to chi-square table, the critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)is obtained corresponding to row 19 and significance level 0.025 as 32.852.

Referring to Table A-4, chi-square table, the critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)is obtained corresponding to row 19 and significance level 0.975 as as 8.907 from the area to the right of 0.975

Thus, the critical values are 8.907 and 32.852, and the non-rejection region is \(\left( {{\chi ^2}:8.907 < {\chi ^2} < 32.852} \right)\).

06

Conclude the test result

The decision rule for the test is as follows.

If the value of the test statistic lies beyond the non-region, reject the null hypothesis at the given level of significance; otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Thus, it is observed that\({\chi ^2} = 8.505\)lies beyond the non-rejection region.

Therefore, it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected, and it can be stated that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that cans with a thickness of 0.0109 in have the same load as the ones with 0.0111 in thickness.

Hence, it can be concluded that the thickness of the cans appears to affect the variation of the axial loads.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Video Games: Checking Requirements Twelve different video games showing alcohol use were observed. The duration times of alcohol use were recorded, with the times (seconds) listed below (based on data from 鈥渃ontent and rating of Teen-Rated Video Games,鈥 by Haninger and Thompson, journal of the American Medical Association, Vol.291, No.7). What requirements must be satisfied to test the claim that the sample is from a population with a mean greater than 90 sec? Are the requirements all satisfied?

84 14 583 50 0 57 207 43 178 0 2 57

Type I and Type II Errors. In Exercises 29鈥32, provide statements that identify the type I error and the type II error that correspond to the given claim. (Although conclusions are usually expressed in verbal form, the answers here can be expressed with statements that include symbolic expressions such as p = 0.1.).

The proportion of people who require no vision correction is less than 0.25.

Final Conclusions. In Exercises 25鈥28, use a significance level of = 0.05 and use the given information for the following:

a. State a conclusion about the null hypothesis. (Reject H0 or fail to reject H0.)

b. Without using technical terms or symbols, state a final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Original claim: The mean pulse rate (in beats per minute) of adult males is 72 bpm. The hypothesis test results in a P-value of 0.0095.

In Exercises 9鈥12, refer to the exercise identified. Make subjective estimates to decide whether results are significantly low or significantly high, then state a conclusion about the original claim. For example, if the claim is that a coin favours heads and sample results consist of 11 heads in 20 flips, conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the coin favours heads (because it is easy to get 11 heads in 20 flips by chance with a fair coin).

Exercise 6 鈥淐ell Phone鈥

Identifying H0 and H1 . In Exercises 5鈥8, do the following:

a. Express the original claim in symbolic form.

b. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Online Data Claim: Most adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could. A GFI Software survey of 565 randomly selected adults showed that 59% of them would erase all of their personal information online if they could.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.