/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q26BSC Testing Claims About Proportions... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Testing Effectiveness of Nicotine Patches In one study of smokers who tried to quit smoking with nicotine patch therapy, 39 were smoking one year after the treatment and 32 were not smoking one year after the treatment (based on data from 鈥淗igh-Dose Nicotine Patch Therapy,鈥 by Dale et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 274, No. 17). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that among smokers who try to quit with nicotine patch therapy, the majority are smoking one year after the treatment. Do these results suggest that the nicotine patch therapy is not effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Null hypothesis: The proportion of smokers who are smoking one year after the treatment is equal to 0.5.

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of smokers who are smoking one year after the treatment is greater than 0.5.

Test statistic: 0.826

Critical value: 1.645

P-value: 0.2044

The null hypothesis isfailed to reject.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is greater than 50%.

The nicotine patch therapy is not very effective in helping smokers quit smoking because the sample results show that 54.9% of smokers start smoking after one year of the treatment, which is quite high.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

It is given that 39 smokers who haveundergone the nicotine patch therapy aresmoking after one year of the treatment, while 32 arenot smoking one year after the treatment. It is claimed that most of the smokers who takethe treatment have started smoking after one year of the treatment.

02

Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is equal to 0.5.

\({H_0}:p = 0.5\).

The alternative hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is more than 0.5.

\[{H_1}:p > 0.5\].

The test is right-tailed.

03

Sample size, sample proportion,and population proportion

The sample size is calculated below.

\(\begin{array}{c}n = 39 + 32\\ = 71\end{array}\).

The sample proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is computed below.

\[\begin{array}{c}\hat p = \frac{{39}}{{71}}\\ = 0.549\end{array}\].

The population proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is equal to 0.5.

04

Test statistic

The value of the test statistic is computed below.

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{\hat p - p}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{pq}}{n}} }}\\ = \frac{{0.549 - 0.5}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{0.5\left( {1 - 0.5} \right)}}{{71}}} }}\\ = 0.826\end{array}\).

Thus, z=0.826

05

Critical value and p-value

Referring to the standard normal table, the critical value of z at\(\alpha = 0.05\)for a right-tailed test is equal to 1.645.

Referring to the standard normal table, the p-value for the test statistic value of 0.826 is equal to 0.2044.

Asthe p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is not rejected.

06

Conclusion of the test

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is greater than 50%.

Although the claim is rejected, it can be seen that the sample percentage of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is equal to 54.9% (greater than 50%).

Thus, it can be said that nicotine patch therapy is not very effective in helping smokers quit smoking.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Stem Cell Survey Adults were randomly selected for a Newsweek poll. They were asked if they 鈥渇avor or oppose using federal tax dollars to fund medical research using stem cells obtained from human embryos.鈥 Of those polled, 481 were in favor, 401 were opposed, and 120 were unsure. A politician claims that people don鈥檛 really understand the stem cell issue and their responses to such questions are random responses equivalent to a coin toss. Exclude the 120 subjects who said that they were unsure, and use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the proportion of subjects who respond in favor is equal to 0.5. What does the result suggest about the politician鈥檚 claim?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Cell Phones and Cancer In a study of 420,095 Danish cell phone users, 135 subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today). Test the claim of a somewhat common belief that such cancers are affected by cell phone use. That is, test the claim that cell phone users develop cancer of the brain or nervous system at a rate that is different from the rate of 0.0340% for people who do not use cell phones. Because this issue has such great importance, use a 0.005 significance level. Based on these results, should cell phone users be concerned about cancer of the brain or nervous system?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Store Checkout-Scanner Accuracy In a study of store checkout-scanners, 1234 items were checked for pricing accuracy; 20 checked items were found to be overcharges, and 1214 checked items were not overcharges (based on data from 鈥淯PC Scanner Pricing Systems: Are They Accurate?鈥 by Goodstein, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that with scanners, 1% of sales are overcharges. (Before scanners were used, the overcharge rate was estimated to be about 1%.) Based on these results, do scanners appear to help consumers avoid overcharges?

In Exercises 9鈥12, refer to the exercise identified. Make subjective estimates to decide whether results are significantly low or significantly high, then state a conclusion about the original claim. For example, if the claim is that a coin favours heads and sample results consist of 11 heads in 20 flips, conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the coin favours heads (because it is easy to get 11 heads in 20 flips by chance with a fair coin).

Exercise 5 鈥淥nline Data鈥

In Exercises 9鈥12, refer to the exercise identified. Make subjective estimates to decide whether results are significantly low or significantly high, then state a conclusion about the original claim. For example, if the claim is that a coin favours heads and sample results consist of 11 heads in 20 flips, conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the coin favours heads (because it is easy to get 11 heads in 20 flips by chance with a fair coin).

Exercise 6 鈥淐ell Phone鈥

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.