/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q26 Testing Claims About Proportions... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Testing Effectiveness of Nicotine Patches In one study of smokers who tried to quit smoking with nicotine patch therapy, 39 were smoking one year after the treatment and 32 were not smoking one year after the treatment (based on data from 鈥淗igh-Dose Nicotine Patch Therapy,鈥 by Dale et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 274, No. 17). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that among smokers who try to quit with nicotine patch therapy, the majority are smoking one year after the treatment. Do these results suggest that the nicotine patch therapy is not effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Null hypothesis: The proportion of smokers who are smoking one year after the treatment is equal to 0.5.

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of smokers who are smoking one year after the treatment is greater than 0.5.

Test statistic: 0.826

Critical value: 1.645

P-value: 0.2044

The null hypothesis is failed to reject.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is greater than 50%.

The nicotine patch therapy is not very effective in helping smokers quit smoking because the sample results show that 54.9% of smokers start smoking after one year of the treatment, which is quite high.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

It is given that 39 smokers who have under gone the nicotine patch therapy are smoking after one year of the treatment, while 32 are not smoking one year after the treatment. It is claimed that most of the smokers who take the treatment have started smoking after one year of the treatment.

02

Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is equal to 0.5.

H0:p=0.5

The alternative hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is more than 0.5.

H1:p>0.5

The test is right-tailed.

03

Sample size, sample proportion, and population proportion

The sample size is calculated below.

n=39+32=71

The sample proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is computed below.

p^=3971=0.549

The population proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is equal to 0.5.

04

Test statistic

The value of the test statistic is computed below.

z=p^-ppqn=0.549-0.50.51-0.571=0.826

Thus, z=0.826.

05

Critical value and p-value

Referring to the standard normal table, the critical value of z at for a right-tailed test is equal to 1.645.

Referring to the standard normal table, the p-value for the test statistic value of 0.826 is equal to 0.2044.

As the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is not rejected.

06

Conclusion of the test

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is greater than 50%.

Although the claim is rejected, it can be seen that the sample percentage of smokers who start smoking after one year of the treatment is equal to 54.9% (greater than 50%).

Thus, it can be said that nicotine patch therapy is not very effective in helping smokers quit smoking.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Identifying H0and H1. In Exercises 5鈥8, do the following:

a. Express the original claim in symbolic form.

b. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Cell Phone Claim: Fewer than 95% of adults have a cell phone. In a Marist poll of 1128 adults, 87% said that they have a cell phone.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Super Bowl Wins Through the sample of the first 49 Super Bowls, 28 of them were won by teams in the National Football Conference (NFC). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the probability of an NFC team Super Bowl win is greater than one-half.

Test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that address the original claim. Assume that a simple random sample is selected from a normally distributed population.

Pulse Rates of Men: A simple random sample of 153 men results in a standard deviation of 11.3 beats per minute (based on Data Set 1 鈥淏ody Data鈥 in Appendix B). The normal range of pulse rates of adults is typically given as 60 to 100 beats per minute. If the range rule of thumb is applied to that normal range, the result is a standard deviation of 10 beats per minute. Use the sample results with a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that pulse rates of men have a standard deviation equal to 10 beats per minute; see the accompanying StatCrunch display for this test. What do the results indicate about the effectiveness of using the range rule of thumb with the 鈥渘ormal range鈥 from 60 to 100 beats per minute for estimating s in this case?

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13鈥24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Car Booster Seats The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration conducted crash tests of child booster seats for cars. Listed below are results from those tests, with the measurements given in hic (standard head injury condition units). The safety requirement is that the hic measurement should be less than 1000 hic. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the sample is from a population with a mean less than 1000 hic. Do the results suggest that all of the child booster seats meet the specified requirement?

774 649 1210 546 431 612

BMI for Miss America. A claimed trend of thinner Miss America winners has generated charges that the contest encourages unhealthy diet habits among young women. Listed below are body mass indexes (BMI) for recent Miss America winners. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that recent winners are from a population with a mean BMI less than 20.16, which was the BMI for winners from the 1920s and 1930s. Given that BMI is a measure of the relative amounts of body fat and height, do recent winners appear to be significantly smaller than those from the 1920s and 1930s?

19.5 20.3 19.6 20.2 17.8 17.9 19.1 18.8 17.6 16.8.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.