/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 9.64 Determine the sufficient evidenc... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Determine the sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of alternative hypothesis.

(a) z= -1.84 (b) z= 1.25

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The P-value is 0.03288

(b) The P-value is 0.89435

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given

Left tailed test

(a) z= -1.84 (b) z= 1.25

02

Part(a) Step 2. Calculation

Since the given hypothesis test is a Left -tailed test, the P-value is given by

P-value=P(zz0),wherez~N(0,1)=P(z-1.84)=0.03288

03

Part(b) Step 3. Calculation

Since the given hypothesis test is a left-tailed test, the P-value is given by

P-value=P(zz0),wherez~N(0,1)=P(z1.25)=0.89435


Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting Power Chantix (varenicline) tablets are used as an aid to help people stop smoking. In a clinical trial, 129 subjects were treated with Chantix twice a day for 12 weeks, and 16 subjects experienced abdominal pain (based on data from Pfizer, Inc.). If someone claims that more than 8% of Chantix users experience abdominal pain, that claim is supported with a hypothesis test conducted with a 0.05 significance level. Using 0.18 as an alternative value of p, the power of the test is 0.96. Interpret this value of the power of the test.

Finding P-values. In Exercises 5鈥8, either use technology to find the P-value or use Table A-3 to find a range of values for the P-value7. Old Faithful. The claim is that for the duration times (sec) of eruptions of the Old Faithful geyser, the mean is =240sec. The sample size is n = 6 and the test statistic is t = 1.340.

The Ericsson method is one of several methods claimed to increase the likelihood of a baby girl. In a clinical trial, results could be analysed with a formal hypothesis test with the alternative hypothesis of p>0.5, which corresponds to the claim that the method increases the likelihood of having a girl, so that the proportion of girls is greater than 0.5. If you have an interest in establishing the success of the method, which of the following P-values would you prefer: 0.999, 0.5, 0.95, 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001? Why?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Medication Usage In a survey of 3005 adults aged 57 through 85 years, it was found that 87.1% of them used at least one prescription medication (based on data from 鈥淯se of Prescription Over-the-Counter Medications and Dietary SupplementsAmong Older Adultsin the United States,鈥 by Qato et al., Journal of the American Medical Association,Vol. 300,No. 24). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that more than 3/4 of adults use at least one prescription medication. Does the rate of prescription use among adults appear to be high?

Cans of coke for the sample data from exercise 1, we get 鈥淧-value<0.01鈥 when testing the claim that the new filling process results in volumes with the same standard deviation of 0.115 oz.

  1. What should we conclude about the null hypothesis?
  2. What should we conclude about the original claims?
  3. What do these results suggest about the new filling process?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.