/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q22 In Exercises 21鈥24, find the m... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

In Exercises 21鈥24, find the mean and median for each of the two samples, then compare the two sets of results.

Parking Meter Theft Listed below are amounts (in millions of dollars) collected from parking meters by Brinks and others in New York City during similar time periods. A larger data set was used to convict five Brinks employees of grand larceny. The data were provided by the attorney for New York City, and they are listed on the Data and Story Library (DASL) website. Do the limited data listed here show evidence of stealing by Brinks employees?

Collection Contractor Was Brinks 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6

Collection Contractor Was Not Brinks 2.2 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.8

Short Answer

Expert verified

The summarized results for the mean and median are :

Measures

Contractor was Brinks

Contractor was not Brinks

Mean

$1.55 millions

$1.73millions

Median

$1.55millions

$1.65millions

Yes, the sample results are suggestive of stealing by Brinks employees.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The amounts collected by Brinks and others are recorded in millions of dollars.

Collection Contractor

was Brinks

1.3

1.5

1.3

1.5

1.4

1.7

1.8

1.7

1.7

1.6

Collection Contractor

was Not

Brinks

2.2

1.9

1.5

1.6

1.5

1.7

1.9

1.6

1.6

1.8

02

Compute mean for each data set

The formula for the mean of a data set is:

x=xn, where xis the observations and nis the count of the observations.

The mean value when the collection contractor was Brinks is given as:

xB=1.3+1.5+1.3+...+1.610=15.5101.55

Thus, when the contractor was Brinks, the mean value was $1.55 million.

The mean value when the collection contractor was not Brinks.

xO=2.2+1.9+1.5+...+1.810=17.310=1.73

Thus, the mean value when the contractor was not Brinks was $1.73 million.

03

Compute the median for each set of measurements

The steps to compute the median measure are as follows:

  • Obtain counts of measurement; n.
  • When n is even, the median is the mean of the middle values.
  • When n is odd, the median is the middle value.

Compute the median for the amounts when the contractor was Brinks.

The number of observations is10.

Arrange the observations in ascending order.

1.3

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.7

1.7

1.8

The middlemost observations are1.5 and 1.6.

The median is given as:

MB=1.5+1.62=3.12=1.55

Thus, the median for the amounts when the contractor was Brinks is $1.55 million.

Compute the median for the amounts when the contractor was not Brinks.

The number of observations is10.

Arrange the observations in ascending order.

1.5

1.5

1.6

1.6

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

1.9

2.2

The middlemost observations are 1.6 and 1.7.

The median is given as:

MO=1.6+1.72=3.32=1.65

Thus, the median for the amounts when the contractor was not Brinks is $1.65 million.

04

Summarize and derive conclusions from the results

The summarized results are:

Measures

Contractor was Brinks

Contractor was not Brinks

Mean

1.55

1.73

Median

1.55

1.65

The mean and median values when the collection contractor was Brinks remained the same. On the other hand, the results vary in the case of the other contractor.

Also, both measures have lower values and exactly the same value when the collection contractor was Brinks. The observation may be suggestive of stealing by Brinks employees.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Resistant Measures Here are four of the Verizon data speeds (Mbps) from Figure 3-1: 13.5, 10.2, 21.1, 15.1. Find the mean and median of these four values. Then find the mean and median after including a fifth value of 142, which is an outlier. (One of the Verizon data speeds is 14.2 Mbps, but 142 is used here as an error resulting from an entry with a missing decimal point.) Compare the two sets of results. How much was the mean affected by the inclusion of the outlier? How much is the median affected by the inclusion of the outlier?

In Exercises 33鈥36, use the range rule of thumb to identify the limits separating values that are significantly low or significantly high

Foot Lengths Based on Data Set 2 鈥淔oot and Height鈥 in Appendix B, adult males have foot lengths with a mean of 27.32 cm and a standard deviation of 1.29 cm. Is the adult male foot length of 30 cm significantly low or significantly high? Explain.

In Exercises 21鈥24, find the coefficient of variation for each of the two samples; then compare the variation. (The same data were used in Section 3-1.) 21.

Bank Queues Waiting times (in seconds) of customers at the Madison Savings Bank are recorded with two configurations: single customer line; individual customer lines.

Single Line 390 396 402 408 426 438 444 462 462 462

Individual Lines 252 324 348 372 402 462 462 510 558 600

Symbols Identify the symbols used for each of the following: (a) sample standard deviation;(b) population standard deviation;(c) sample variance;(d) population variance.

In Exercises 21鈥24, find the coefficient of variation for each of the two samples; then compare the variation. (The same data were used in Section 3-1.) 21.

Parking Meter Theft Listed below are amounts (in millions of dollars) collected from parking meters by Brinks and others in New York City during similar time periods. A larger data set was used to convict five Brinks employees of grand larceny. The data were provided by the attorney for New York City, and they are listed on the DASL Website. Do the two samples appear to have different amounts of variation?

Collection Contractor Was Brinks 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6

Collection Contractor Was Not Brinks 2.2 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.8

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.