/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q19BSC Exercises 13鈥28 use the same d... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Exercises 13鈥28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13鈥28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Using the listed lemon/crash data, find the best predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 500 metric tons of lemon imports. Is the prediction worthwhile?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The regression equation is\(\hat y = - 0.0028x + 16.5\).

The best-predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 500 metric tons of lemon imports will be 15.1. The prediction is not worthwhile as the relationship between lemon imports and crash fatality does not make much sense.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The given data provides the information of the 鈥榣emon imports鈥 and 鈥榗rash fatality rate鈥, as follows.

02

State the equation for the regression line

the formula for the estimated regression line is

\(y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\).

Here,

\({b_0}\)is the Y-intercept,

\({b_1}\)is the slope,

\(x\)is the explanatory variable, and

\(\hat y\) is the response variable (predicted value).

Let X denote the lemon imports and Y denote the crash fatality rate.

03

Compute the slope and intercept

The calculations required to compute the slope and intercept are as follows.

The sample size is \(\left( n \right) = 5\).

The slope is computed as

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_1} = \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ = \frac{{5 \times 28571.7 - 1863 \times 77.2}}{{5 \times 762589 - {{1863}^2}}}\\ = - 0.00282\end{array}\).

The intercept is computed as

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_0} = \frac{{\left( {\sum y } \right)\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum {xy} } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ = \frac{{77.2 \times 762589 - 1863 \times 28571.7}}{{5 \times 762589 - {{1863}^2}}}\\ = 16.4909\end{array}\).

Thus, the estimated regression equation is

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ = 16.5 - 0.0028x\end{array}\).

04

Check the model

Refer to exercise 19 of section 10-1 for the following result.

1) The scatter plot shows an approximate linear relationship between the variables.

2) The P-value is 0.0010.

As theP-value is less than the level of significance (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, the correlation is statistically significant.

Referring to figure 10-5, the criteria for a good regression model are satisfied.

Thus, the regression equation can be used for prediction.

05

Compute the prediction

Substitute 500 metric tons of lemons in the estimated linear regression model for the crash fatality rate.

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = 16.5 - 0.0028x\\ = 16.5 - 0.0028\left( {500} \right)\\ = 15.1\end{array}\).

Therefore, the best-predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 500 metric tons of lemon imports will be 15.1.

The predictions do not seem worthwhile as the relationship between the two variables does not make sense.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting a Computer Display. In Exercises 9鈥12, refer to the display obtained by using the paired data consisting of Florida registered boats (tens of thousands) and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats in Florida for different recent years (from Data Set 10 in Appendix B). Along with the paired boat, manatee sample data, StatCrunch was also given the value of 85 (tens of thousands) boats to be used for predicting manatee fatalities.

Testing for Correlation Use the information provided in the display to determine the value of the linear correlation coefficient. Is there sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between numbers of registered boats and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats?

Explore! Exercises 9 and 10 provide two data sets from 鈥淕raphs in Statistical Analysis,鈥 by F. J. Anscombe, the American Statistician, Vol. 27. For each exercise,

a. Construct a scatterplot.

b. Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r, then determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between the two variables.

c. Identify the feature of the data that would be missed if part (b) was completed without constructing the scatterplot.

x

10

8

13

9

11

14

6

4

12

7

5

y

9.14

8.14

8.74

8.77

9.26

8.10

6.13

3.10

9.13

7.26

4.74

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5鈥8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Crickets and Temperature r = 0.874 (x = number of cricket chirps in 1 minute, y = temperature in 掳F)

Global Warming If we find that there is a linear correlation between the concentration of carbon dioxide (\(C{O_2}\)) in our atmosphere and the global mean temperature, does that indicate that changes in (\(C{O_2}\))cause changes in the global mean temperature? Why or why not?

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5鈥8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Bears r = 0.783 (x = head width of a bear, y = weight of a bear)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.