/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Test the given claim. Identify t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section. The drug Eliquis (apixaban) is used to help prevent blood clots in certain patients. In clinical trials, among 5924 patients treated with Eliquis, 153 developed the adverse reaction of nausea (based on data from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that \(3 \%\) of Eliquis users develop nausea. Does nausea appear to be a problematic adverse reaction?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Fail to reject the null hypothesis; nausea does not appear to be a problematic adverse reaction.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the null and alternative hypotheses

The null hypothesis (H0) represents the status quo or a statement of no effect. The alternative hypothesis (H1) is what you aim to support.H0: p = 0.03 (The proportion of patients who develop nausea is 3%)H1: p ≠ 0.03 (The proportion of patients who develop nausea is not 3%)
02

Calculate the test statistic

To compute the test statistic, use the formula for the z-score in the context of proportions: \[z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1 - p_0)}{n}}}\]Where:\hat{p} = \frac{153}{5924}\approx 0.0258p_0 = 0.03n = 5924Plugging in the values:\[z = \frac{0.0258 - 0.03}{\sqrt{\frac{0.03(1 - 0.03)}{5924}}}\approx -1.050\]
03

Find the P-value

The next step is to find the P-value corresponding to the calculated z-score. Since it's a two-tailed test, we consider both extremes of the normal distribution:For z = -1.050,The P-value ≈ 2 * P(Z < -1.050)Consulting standard normal distribution tables, we find:P(Z < -1.050) ≈ 0.1475Thus, the P-value ≈ 2 * 0.1475 = 0.295
04

Compare the P-value to the significance level

Compare the P-value to the significance level (α = 0.05):P-value (0.295) > α (0.05)
05

State the conclusion about the null hypothesis

Because the P-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
06

State the final conclusion that addresses the original claim

There is not enough evidence to reject the claim that 3% of Eliquis users develop nausea. Therefore, nausea does not appear to be a problematic adverse reaction at the 0.05 significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

null hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (denoted as H0) is a statement that indicates no effect or no difference. It serves as the default or baseline assumption that the test seeks to challenge. In our exercise, the null hypothesis states that 3% of Eliquis users develop nausea. This can be written mathematically as: H0: p = 0.03. The null hypothesis is what we test against and will only reject if the data provides sufficient evidence.
alternative hypothesis
Contrary to the null hypothesis is the alternative hypothesis (denoted as H1 or Ha). This hypothesis represents what we aim to support or prove. It suggests that there is an effect or a difference. In the same exercise, the alternative hypothesis claims that the proportion of Eliquis users who develop nausea is not 3%. This can be mathematically stated as: H1: p ≠ 0.03. The alternative hypothesis encompasses the possibility that the true proportion either exceeds or falls short of the 3% mark.
P-value
The P-value is a key measure in hypothesis testing, representing the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the observed data, assuming the null hypothesis is true. Essentially, it helps in determining the significance of your results. In our example, the calculated P-value is approximately 0.295. To interpret it, we compare the P-value to the significance level (α). If the P-value is less than or equal to α, we reject the null hypothesis. Here, because 0.295 > 0.05 (significance level), we fail to reject H0. The higher the P-value, the stronger the evidence for failing to reject the null hypothesis.
test statistic
A test statistic is a standardized value that is derived from sample data during a hypothesis test. It quantifies the degree of evidence against the null hypothesis. In hypothesis testing for proportions, we commonly use the z-score.
The format of the z-score is: \(z = \frac{\text{\textasciicircum{p}} - p0}{\frac{\text{\textasciicircum{p}}0(1 - p0)}{n}} \)
where \( \text{\textasciicircum{p}} \) is the sample proportion,
\( p0 \) is the hypothesized proportion, and \( n \) is the sample size.
In our solution:
\( \text{z} \approx \frac{0.0258 - 0.03}{\frac{0.03(1 - 0.03)}{5924}} \frac{} \approx -1.050 \)
This z-score tells us how many standard deviations the sample proportion is away from the hypothesized population proportion. The value can then be used to find the P-value.
significance level
The significance level (denoted as α) is a threshold set by the researcher before conducting a hypothesis test. It specifies the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is, in fact, true (Type I error). Commonly used levels are 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10. In our specific scenario, a significance level of 0.05 was chosen. At α = 0.05, we accept a 5% chance of erroneously rejecting the null hypothesis.
This means that if the P-value is less than 0.05, we would reject H0; otherwise, we fail to reject it. In our calculation, the P-value of 0.295 was greater than 0.05, leading to the conclusion that there is insufficient evidence to argue against the null hypothesis. Therefore, we accept that the proportion of patients experiencing nausea is indeed 3%, suggesting nausea is not a problematic adverse reaction.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\) and use the given information for the following: a. State a conclusion about the null hypothesis. (Reject \(H_{0}\) or fail to reject \(H_{0 .}\) ) b. Without using technical terms or symbols, state a final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Original claim: More than \(58 \%\) of adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could. The hypothesis test results in a \(P\) -value of 0.3257.

Identifying \(H_{0}\) and \(H_{1}\) Do the following: a. Express the original claim in symbolic form. b. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses. Claim: Fewer than \(95 \%\) of adults have a cell phone. In a Marist poll of 1128 adults, \(87 \%\) said that they have a cell phone.

Test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Assume that a simple random sample is selected from a normally distributed population. Coffee Vending Machines The Brazil vending machine dispenses coffee, and a random sample of 27 filled cups have contents with a mean of 7.14 oz and a standard deviation of 0.17 oz. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the machine dispenses amounts with a standard deviation greater than the standard deviation of 0.15 oz specified in the machine design.

Assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 49 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in \(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL}\) ) have a mean of 0.4 and a standard deviation of 21.0 (based on data from "Effect of Raw Garlic vs Commercial Garlic Supplements on Plasma Lipid Concentrations in Adults with Moderate Hypercholesterolemia," by Gardner et al., Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. \(167,\) No. 4 ). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than \(0 .\) What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment?

Test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section. In a study of 420,095 Danish cell phone users, 135 subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today). Test the claim of a somewhat common belief that such cancers are affected by cell phone use. That is, test the claim that cell phone users develop cancer of the brain or nervous system at a rate that is different from the rate of \(0.0340 \%\) for people who do not use cell phones. Because this issue has such great importance, use a 0.005 significance level. Based on these results, should cell phone users be concerned about cancer of the brain or nervous system?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.