/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 82 Construct \(90 \%\) confidence i... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Construct \(90 \%\) confidence intervals for the binomial parameter \(p\) for each of the following pairs of values. Write your answers on the chart. $$\begin{array}{lllll} & \begin{array}{l}\text { Observed Proportion } \\\p^{\prime}=x / n\end{array} & \text { Sample Size } & \text { Lower limit } & \text { Upper limit } \\\\\hline \text { a. } & p^{\prime}=0.3 & n=30 & \\\\\text { b. } & p^{\prime}=0.7 & n=30 & \\\\\text { c. } & p^{\prime}=0.5 & n=10 & \\\\\text { d. } & p^{\prime}=0.5 & n=100 & \\\\\text { e. } & p^{\prime}=0.5 & n=1000 & \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ f. Explain the relationship between the answers to parts a and b. g. Explain the relationship among the answers to parts c-e.

Short Answer

Expert verified
For parts a and b, as the observed proportion increases, the confidence interval also increases keeping the sample size constant. For part c, d and e, as the sample size increases the confidence intervals decrease due to the impact of a larger sample size in lowering the standard error, thus tightening the confidence interval range around the observed proportion.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the standard error

For each pair of values (observed proportion and sample size), calculate the standard error (SE) using the formula \(SE = \sqrt{p(1-p)/n}\). Replace \(p\) and \(n\) with their respective values in each pair.
02

Calculate the confidence interval

Calculate the lower and upper limit of confidence interval for each case using the formula \(Lower Limit = p - 1.645(SE)\) and \(Upper Limit = p + 1.645(SE)\)
03

Explanation A and B

Both cases have the same sample size but different observed proportions. It needs to be observed how the difference in observed proportions impacts the limits of the confidence intervals.
04

Explanation C, D and E

Here, the observed proportions for all three cases are the same (.5) but the sample sizes are different. It needs to be explained how varying sample sizes affect the limits of the confidence intervals with the same observed proportions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Binomial Parameter
When conducting a study that involves categorical data, we frequently utilize the binomial distribution, which has a single parameter, denoted as p. This parameter represents the probability of a success for an individual trial. For example, p could indicate the probability that a flipped coin lands on heads.

However, the true probability p is often unknown, and hence we estimate it using sample data, which gives us p' (read as 'p-hat'). p' is calculated as the ratio of successes (x) to the total number of trials (n). This process provides us with an observed proportion but with a level of uncertainty attached. To address this uncertainty, we use confidence intervals, which give us a range of values within which we are 'confident' that the true parameter p lies.

The width of a confidence interval for a binomial parameter reflects our uncertainty: wider intervals suggest less certainty about the parameter's estimate. In constructing these intervals, it's not only the proportion that matters but also the sample size, which brings us to the additional concepts of standard error and sample size effect.
Standard Error Calculation
The standard error (SE) is a vital concept in statistics as it measures the variability or precision of an estimate. When working with binomial parameters, the SE for our estimated proportion is calculated using the formula \(SE = \sqrt{p'(1-p')/n}\), where p' is the sample proportion and n is the sample size.

In layman's terms, the SE quantifies how much the observed proportion p' is expected to vary due to the random nature of sampling. A smaller SE indicates that if we were to repeatedly take samples of the same size from the population, the calculated proportions would tend to be closer to each other and to the true population proportion p. Conversely, a larger SE would suggest more variability from sample to sample.

It's essential to note that SE is influenced by both the observed proportion and the sample size. This ties directly into the concept of the sample size effect, which we will explore next. The calculation of the SE is the foundation for constructing confidence intervals, as it will be factored into determining the range's limits.
Sample Size Effect
The effect of sample size on confidence intervals is one of the most crucial considerations in statistics. Specifically, as the sample size increases, the standard error decreases. This inverse relationship is crucial because a smaller standard error leads to narrower confidence intervals.

In practical terms, the larger the sample size n, the more information we have about the population, which in turn increases our confidence in the precision of our estimate. This increased precision is reflected in a tighter range of values within our confidence interval. Thus, the choice of sample size has significant implications for the reliability of statistical conclusions.

The textbook's example vividly illustrates this: despite the same observed proportion in parts c, d, and e, the confidence intervals become narrower as the sample size grows from 10 to 1000. This pattern highlights the importance of collecting adequate sample sizes in research: larger samples reduce uncertainty, yielding sharper insights into the population parameter being studied.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Pizza Shack has been experimenting with different recipes for their pizza crust, thinking they might replace their current recipe. They are planning to sample pizza made with the new crust. Before sampling, a strategy is needed so that after the tasting results are in, Pizza Shack will know how to interpret their customers' preferences. The decision is not being taken lightly because there is much to be gained or lost depending on whether or not the decision is a popular one. A one-tailed hypothesis test of \(p=P(\text { prefer new crust })=0.50\) is being planned. a. If \(H_{a}: p>0.50\) is used, explain the meaning of the four possible outcomes and their resulting actions. b. If \(H_{a}: p<0.50\) is used, explain the meaning of the four possible outcomes and their resulting actions. c. Which alternative hypothesis do you recommend be used, \(p>0.5\) or \(p<0.5 ?\) Explain.

A winemaker has placed a large order for the no. 9 corks described in Applied Example 6.13 (p. 285 ) and is concerned about the number of corks that might have smaller diameters. During the corking process, the corks are squeezed down to 16 to \(17 \mathrm{mm}\) in diameter for insertion into bottles with an \(18 \mathrm{mm}\) opening. The cork then expands to make the seal. The winemaker wants the corks to be as tight as possible and is therefore concerned about any that might be undersized. The diameter of each cork is measured in several places, and an average diameter is reported for each cork. The cork manufacturer has assured the winemaker that each cork has an average diameter within the specs and that all average diameters have a normal distribution with a mean of \(24.0 \mathrm{mm}\). a. Why does it make sense for the diameter of the cork to be assigned the average of several different diameter measurements? A random sample of 18 corks is taken from the batch to be shipped and the diameters (in millimeters) obtained: $$\begin{array}{llllllll}\hline 23.93 & 23.91 & 23.82 & 24.02 & 23.93 & 24.17 & 23.93 & 23.84 & 24.13 \\\24.01 & 23.83 & 23.74 & 23.73 & 24.10 & 23.86 & 23.90 & 24.32 & 23.83 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ b. The average diameter spec is "24 \(\mathrm{mm}+0.6 \mathrm{mm} /\) \(-0.4 \mathrm{mm} . "\) Does it appear this order meets the spec on an individual cork basis? Explain. c. Does the sample in part a show sufficient reason to doubt the truthfulness of the claim, that the mean average diameter is \(24.0 \mathrm{mm},\) at the 0.02 level of significance? A different sample of 18 corks was randomly selected and the diameters (in millimeters) obtained: $$\begin{array}{lllllllll}\hline 23.90 & 23.98 & 24.28 & 24.22 & 24.07 & 23.87 & 24.05 & 24.06 & 23.82 \\\24.03 & 23.87 & 24.08 & 23.98 & 24.21 & 24.08 & 24.06 & 23.87 & 23.95 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ d. Does the preceding sample show sufficient reason to doubt the truthfulness of the claim, that the mean average diameter is \(24.0 \mathrm{mm},\) at the 0.02 level of significance? e. What effect did the two different sample means have on the calculated test statistic in parts c and d? Explain. f. What effect did the two different sample standard deviations have on the calculated test statistic in parts c and d? Explain.

An insurance company states that \(90 \%\) of its claims are settled within 30 days. A consumer group selected a random sample of 75 of the company's claims to test this statement. If the consumer group found that 55 of the claims were settled within 30 days, does it have sufficient reason to support the contention that less than \(90 \%\) of the claims are settled within 30 days? Use \(\alpha=0.05\). a. Solve using the \(p\) -value approach. b. Solve using the classical approach.

Acetaminophen is an active ingredient found in more than 600 over-the-counter and prescription medicines, such as pain relievers, cough suppressants, and cold medications. It is safe and effective when used correctly, but taking too much can lead to liver damage. A researcher believes the mean amount of acetaminophen per tablet in a particular brand of cold tablets is different from the 600 mg claimed by the manufacturer. A random sample of 30 tablets had a mean acetaminophen content of \(596.3 \mathrm{mg}\) with a standard deviation of \(4.7 \mathrm{mg}\). a. Is the assumption of normality reasonable? Explain. b. Construct a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the estimate of the mean acetaminophen content. c. What does the confidence interval found in part b suggest about the mean acetaminophen content of one pill? Do you believe there is 600 mg per tablet? Explain.

a. The central \(90 \%\) of the chi-square distribution with 11 degrees of freedom lies between what values? b. The central \(95 \%\) of the chi-square distribution with 11 degrees of freedom lies between what values? c. The central \(99 \%\) of the chi-square distribution with 11 degrees of freedom lies between what values?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.