/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 97 For each of the following pairs ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For each of the following pairs of values, state the decision that will occur and why. a. \(\quad p\) -value \(=0.014, \alpha=0.02\) b. \(\quad p\) -value \(=0.118, \alpha=0.05\) c. \(\quad p\) -value \(=0.048, \alpha=0.05\) d. \(\quad p\) -value \(=0.064, \alpha=0.10\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) We reject the null hypothesis. b) We fail to reject the null hypothesis. c) We reject the null hypothesis. d) We reject the null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Understand decision criteria

The decision-making process involves comparing the p-value to \(\alpha\). If the p-value is less than or equal to \(\alpha\), we reject the null hypothesis. If the p-value is greater than \(\alpha\), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
02

Apply decision criteria to each pair

a) For \(p = 0.014\) and \(\alpha = 0.02\), since \(p \leq \alpha\), we reject the null hypothesis.\n\nb) For \(p = 0.118\) and \(\alpha = 0.05\), since \(p > \alpha\), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.\n\nc) For \(p = 0.048\) and \(\alpha = 0.05\), since \(p \leq \alpha\), we reject the null hypothesis.\n\nd) For \(p = 0.064\) and \(\alpha = 0.10\), since \(p \leq \alpha\), we reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

P-Value
The p-value is a key component in the field of statistics, particularly when performing hypothesis testing. It provides a measure of the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. Simply put, the p-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the value observed, given that the null hypothesis is true.

For example, if we conduct an experiment to determine if a new drug is more effective than an existing one, the null hypothesis could be that there is no difference in effectiveness between the two. If we find a p-value of 0.014, it indicates there is only a 1.4% chance of obtaining the observed result if the null hypothesis were true. In practical terms, a low p-value suggests that the observed data is unlikely to have occurred by random chance, thus providing evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Alpha Level
The alpha level, denoted by \( \alpha \), is the threshold for determining statistical significance in hypothesis testing. It represents the maximum probability of making a Type I error, which is the mistake of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Researchers often set the alpha level before conducting a test, with common values being 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10.

Returning to our drug effectiveness example, if we set an alpha level of 0.02, we are indicating that we are willing to accept a 2% chance of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis. This alpha level is what we compare against the calculated p-value of our test to reach a conclusion: if the p-value is smaller than our alpha level, we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative.
Rejecting the Null Hypothesis
Rejecting the null hypothesis is an important decision in hypothesis testing. When the p-value is less than or equal to the alpha level, we reject the null hypothesis. This means that the data provides sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.

For instance, in our exercise solutions, decisions were made based on the p-value in comparison to the alpha level. With a pair like \(p=0.014, \alpha=0.02\), the p-value falls below the threshold set by the alpha level, leading us to reject the null hypothesis. It implies that the observed result is statistically significant, assuming our alpha level represents an acceptable risk for a Type I error. It is important for students to grasp that this decision does not prove the alternative hypothesis; it simply suggests that the null hypothesis is not a good explanation for the observed data.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a determination about the non-randomness of results obtained from a hypothesis test. When we say that results are statistically significant, we mean that the likelihood of those results occurring by chance alone is low, based on our predetermined alpha level.

For example, in part c of the exercise, where the p-value is 0.048 and the alpha level is 0.05, the result is statistically significant because the p-value is smaller than the alpha. This indicates that the observed data was significant enough to not have likely come from random variation. Understanding statistical significance helps students to critically evaluate research findings and determine whether the evidence presented is strong enough to support the claims being made.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The average size of a home in 2008 fell to 2343 square feet, according to the National Association of Home Builders and reported in USA Today (January 11, 2009). The homebuilders of a northeastern city feel that the average size of homes continues to grow each year. To test their claim, a random sample of 45 new homes was selected and revealed an average of 2490 square feet. Assuming that the population standard deviation is approximately 450 square feet, is there evidence that the average size is larger in the northeast compared to the national 2008 figure? Use a 0.05 level of significance.

A large order of the no. 9 corks described in Applied Example \(6.13(p .285)\) is about to be shipped. The final quality-control inspection includes an estimation of the mean ovality (ovalization; out-of roundness) of the corks. The diameter of each cork is measured in several places, and the difference between the maximum and minimum diameters is the measure of ovality for each cork. After years of measuring corks, the manufacturer is sure that ovality has a mounded distribution with a standard deviation of \(0.10 \mathrm{mm} .\) A random sample of 36 corks is taken from the batch and the ovality is determined for each. $$\begin{array}{lllllllll} \hline 0.32 & 0.27 & 0.24 & 0.31 & 0.20 & 0.38 & 0.32 & 0.11 & 0.25 \\ 0.22 & 0.35 & 0.20 & 0.28 & 0.17 & 0.36 & 0.28 & 0.38 & 0.17 \\ 0.34 & 0.06 & 0.43 & 0.13 & 0.39 & 0.15 & 0.18 & 0.13 & 0.25 \\ 0.20 & 0.16 & 0.26 & 0.47 & 0.21 & 0.19 & 0.34 & 0.24 & 0.20 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ a. The out-of-round spec is "less than \(1.0 \mathrm{mm}\) " Does it appear this order meets the spec on an individual cork basis? Explain. b. The certification sheet that accompanies the shipment includes a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean ovality. Construct the confidence interval. c. Explain what the confidence interval found in part b tells about this shipment of corks.

From candy to jewelry to flowers, the average consumer was expected to spend \(\$ 123.89\) for Mother's Day 2009, according to an April 2009 National Retail Federation's survey. Local merchants felt this average was too high for their area and contracted an agency to conduct a study. A random sample of 60 consumers was taken at a local shopping mall the Saturday before Mother's Day and produced a sample mean amount of \(\$ 106.27 .\) If \(\sigma=\$ 39.50\) does the sample provide sufficient evidence to support the merchants' claim at the 0.05 level of significance?

Women own an average of 15 pairs of shoes. This is based on a survey of female adults by Kelton Research for Eneslow, the New York City-based Foot Comfort Center. Suppose a random sample of 35 newly hired female college graduates was taken and the sample mean was 18.37 pairs of shoes. If \(\sigma=6.12,\) does this sample provide sufficient evidence that young female college graduates' mean number of shoes is greater than the overall mean number for all female adults? Use a 0.10 level of significance.

Who says that the more you spend on a wristwatch, the more accurately the watch will keep time? Some say that you can now buy a quartz watch for less than \(\$ 25\) that keeps time just as accurately as watches that cost four times as much. Suppose the average accuracy for all watches being sold today, regardless of price, is within 19.8 seconds per month with a standard deviation of 9.1 seconds. A random sample of 36 quartz watches priced less than \(\$ 25\) is taken, and their accuracy check reveals a sample mean error of 22.7 seconds per month. Based on this evidence, complete the hypothesis test of \(H_{o}: \mu=20\) vs. \(H_{a}: \mu>20\) at the 0.05 level of significance using the probability-value approach. a. Define the parameter. b. State the null and alternative hypotheses. c. Specify the hypothesis test criteria. d. Present the sample evidence. e. Find the probability distribution information. f. Determine the results.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.