/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Write an informal negation for e... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Write an informal negation for each of the following statements: a. All pots have lids. b. All birds can fly. c. Some pigs can fly, d. Some dogs have spots.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. There exists a pot without a lid. b. There exists a bird which can't fly. c. No pigs can fly. d. No dogs have spots.

Step by step solution

01

Negate the Universal Quantifier

Instead of stating that all pots have lids, consider the negation: there is at least one pot without a lid. b. All birds can fly.
02

Negate the Universal Quantifier

Instead of stating that all birds can fly, consider the negation: there is at least one bird which can't fly. c. Some pigs can fly.
03

Negate the Existential Quantifier

Instead of stating that some pigs can fly, consider the negation: no pigs can fly. d. Some dogs have spots.
04

Negate the Existential Quantifier

Instead of stating that some dogs have spots, consider the negation: no dogs have spots.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding the Universal Quantifier
In logic, the universal quantifier is a way to express that something is true for all elements in a set. It's usually denoted by the symbol \( \forall \). For instance, when you say "all pots have lids," you're using a universal quantifier. This means every single pot within the considered set has a lid.

To create a negation of a universally quantified statement, the approach is different than simple negation of individual truths. Instead of saying, "all pots have lids," the negation turns to "there exists at least one pot that does not have a lid." This switches the perspective from all elements to one exception, pointing out that a universal truth doesn't hold if even one counterexample exists.

With examples like birds and flying, remember that a single flightless bird can negate the statement that all birds can fly. So, keep these scenarios in mind when working through universal quantification problems.
Exploring the Existential Quantifier
The existential quantifier, usually denoted with \( \exists \), is used in logic to express that there is at least one element in a set for which a certain statement is true. When you say, "some pigs can fly," you are claiming that there is at least one pig that can indeed fly.

Negating an existential quantifier changes the expression from "there exists at least one" to "there does not exist any." So, for the statement about pigs, the negation becomes "no pigs can fly." This kind of negation turns a positive possibility into a universal impossibility.

The same logic applies to other similar statements, like "some dogs have spots." When negated, it turns into "no dogs have spots." This demonstrates how negating the existential quantifier invariably leads to a statement about non-existence across the board.
Mastering Informal Negation
Informal negation involves translating logical statements into everyday language, often by expressing the opposite of the original statement in a more casual manner.

For example, "all pots have lids" informally becomes "not all pots have lids." This doesn't matter every detail but sufficiently implies a negation in an understandable way. Similarly, with "all birds can fly," you might informally say, "it's not true that all birds can fly," highlighting the exception without being overly technical.

When dealing with statements like "some pigs can fly," an informal negation could sound like "no pigs fly in reality." The idea is to convey that what might have been possible is actually not happening.
  • "All dogs have spots" informally negated could be phrased as "not every dog has spots."
  • Think of informal negation like explaining the opposite of a statement in a conversation with a friend.
By mastering informal negation, you can effectively communicate logical ideas using an approach that is easy to grasp and relate to.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Rewrite the following statements in the two forms \(" \exists\) ___ \(x\) such that " and " \(\exists x\) such that and a. Some hatters are mad. b. Some questions are easy.

Let \(D=\\{-48,-14,-8,0,1,3,16,23,26,32,36\\}\). Determine which of the following statements are true and which are false. Provide counterexamples for those state ments that are false. a. \(\forall x \in D\), if \(x\) is odd then \(x>0\). b. \(\forall x \in D\), if \(x\) is less than 0 then \(x\) is even. c. \(\forall x \in D\), if \(x\) is even then \(x \leq 0\). d. \(\forall x \in D\), if the ones digit of \(x\) is 2 , then the tens digit is 3 or 4 . e. \(\forall x \in D\), if the ones digit of \(x\) is 6 , then the tens digit is 1 or 2 .

In exercises \(28-33\), reorder the premises in each of the arguments to show that the conclusion follows as a valid consequence from the premises. It may be helpful to rewrite the statements in ifthen form and replace some statements by their contrapositives. Exercises 28-30 refer to the kinds of Tarski worlds discussed in Example 2.1.12 and 2.3.1. Exercises 31 and 32 are adapted from Symbolic Logic by Lewis Carroll.* 1\. If an object is not blue, then it is not a triangle. 2\. If an object is not above all the gray objects, then it is not a square. 3\. Every black object is a square. 4\. Every object that is above all the gray objects is above all the triangles. \(\therefore\) If an object is black, then it is above all the blue objects.

Use the facts that the negation of a \(\forall\) statement is a \(\exists\) statement and that the negation of an if-then statement is an and statement to rewrite each of the statements \(42-45\) without using the word sufficient or necessary. A frequent-flyer club brochure states, "You may select among carriers only if they offer the same lowest fare. "Assuming that "only if"' has its formal, logical meaning, does this statement guarantee that if two carriers offer the same lowest fare, the customer will be free to choose between them? Explain.

Rewrite each of the following statements in the form \(" v\) \(x\), if then \(x\) and \(y\), if then \("\) or " a. All Java programs have at least 5 lines. b. Any valid argument with true premises has a true conclusion. c. The sum of any two even integers is even. d. The product of any two odd integers is odd.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.