/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 Frank bought a personal computer... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Frank bought a personal computer or a video cassette recorder (VCR). If he bought a VCR, then he likes to watch movies at home. He does not like to watch movies at home.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Using the given statements and logical reasoning, we can conclude that Frank bought a personal computer. This is because assuming he bought a VCR leads to a contradiction with the statement that he does not like watching movies at home.

Step by step solution

01

Statement 1

Frank bought a personal computer or a VCR. Based on this statement, we know that Frank bought one of the two.
02

Statement 2

If Frank bought a VCR, then he likes to watch movies at home. If we assume that Frank bought a VCR, the statement implies that he should like watching movies at home.
03

Statement 3

Frank does not like to watch movies at home. This statement suggests that he doesn't like watching movies at home.
04

Using the Statements to Form a Logical Argument

We're trying to determine whether Frank bought a PC or a VCR. If we assume he bought a VCR, Statement 2 implies he likes watching movies at home. However, Statement 3 contradicts that, as it states he doesn't like watching movies at home. Since there's a contradiction, we can infer that the assumption of buying a VCR is false.
05

Conclusion

Since the assumption of Frank buying a VCR leads to a contradiction, we can conclude that Frank bought a personal computer.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Argument
A logical argument consists of a structured series of statements that lead to a conclusion. The strength of an argument depends on the validity of its structure and the truth of its premises. The exercise involves examining a set of statements about Frank's purchases and preferences to reach a conclusion about what he bought.

For example, the exercise begins by suggesting two possible purchases by Frank - a personal computer or a VCR. This sets the groundwork for the argument with an 'either-or' premise. Following that, additional information is presented, stating a conditional 'if-then' relationship and a fact about Frank's preferences. These pieces are carefully assembled to form an argument that concludes which item Frank bought. Ensuring students understand how to evaluate each statement and apply logical rules is key to grasping logical arguments.
Contradiction
A contradiction arises when two or more statements are in direct opposition to one another, so that if one is true, the others must be false. In logical reasoning, contradictions play a critical role in determining the validity of arguments.

In our textbook exercise, the contradiction occurs between the second statement (if Frank bought a VCR, then he likes to watch movies at home) and the third statement (Frank does not like to watch movies at home). This contradiction is used to invalidate the assumption that Frank bought a VCR. For students, recognizing contradictions is essential, as it helps in eliminating possibilities and reinforcing the argument's conclusion. Learning to identify and understand contradictions leads to stronger critical thinking skills.
Propositional Logic
Propositional logic is a branch of logic that deals with propositions and their relationships. A proposition is a declarative statement that is either true or false, and propositional logic uses logical connectives like 'and', 'or', 'if...then', and 'not' to combine these propositions.

The statements about Frank's purchasing decision can be seen as propositions: 'Frank bought a PC or VCR', 'If Frank bought a VCR, he likes watching movies', and 'Frank doesn't like watching movies'. The logical connectives in these propositions help construct and evaluate the argument. Through the exercise, students learn how to apply propositional logic to real-life scenarios, which is a critical thinking skill that extends beyond the classroom.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

There are seven lots, 1 through \(7,\) to be developed in a certain city. A builder would like to build one bank, two hotels, and two restaurants on these lots, subject to the following restrictions by the city planning board (The Official LSAT PrepBook, 1991): If lot 2 is used, lot 4 cannot be used. If lot 5 is used, lot 6 cannot be used. The bank can be built only on lot \(5,6,\) or \(7 .\) A hotel cannot be built on lot \(5 .\) A restaurant can be built only on lot \(1,2,3,\) or \(5 .\) Which of the following is a possible list of locations for building them? A. The bank on lot \(7,\) hotels on lots 1 and \(4,\) and restaurants on lots 2 and 5 B. The bank on lot \(7,\) hotels on lots 3 and \(4,\) and restaurants on lots 1 and 5 C. The bank on lot \(7,\) hotels on lots 4 and \(5,\) and restaurants on lots 1 and 3.

Determine whether or not the assignment statement \(x \leftarrow x+1\) will be executed in each sequence of statements, where \(i \leftarrow 2, j \leftarrow 3, k \leftarrow 6,\) and \(x \leftarrow 0\). $$ \begin{array}{l} \text { If }(i<3) \wedge(j<4) \text { then } \\ \qquad x \leftarrow x+1 \end{array} $$ else $$ y

The logical operators NAND (not and) and NOR (not or) are defined as follows: $$ \begin{aligned} p & \text { NAND } q \equiv \sim(p \wedge q) \\ p & \text { NOR } q \equiv \sim(p \vee q) \end{aligned} $$ Construct a truth table for each proposition. \(p\) NOR \(q\)

Simplify each boolean expression. $$p \wedge(p \wedge q)$$

Simplify each boolean expression. $$p \wedge(p \vee \sim q) \wedge(\sim p \vee \sim q)$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.