/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 A relation \(R\) is called asymm... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A relation \(R\) is called asymmetric if \((a, b) \in R\) implies that \((b, a) \notin R .\) Exercises \(18-24\) explore the notion of an asymmetric relation. Exercise 22 focuses on the difference between asymmetry and antisymmetry. Give an example of an asymmetric relation on the set of all people.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 'is a parent of' relation is an example of an asymmetric relation on the set of all people.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Asymmetric Relation

An asymmetric relation is defined such that if \((a, b) \in R\), then \((b, a) \otin R\). Essentially, if a person a is related to person b, then person b should not be related to person a in the same way.
02

Select an Example Set

Consider the set of all people. Let's denote this set as \(P\).
03

Identify a Suitable Relation

A suitable relation can be something that does not equate bidirectional equality. For instance, the 'is a parent of' relation: If person a is a parent of person b, then it cannot be that person b is a parent of person a.
04

Formulate the Example

Define the relation \(R\) on \(P\) as follows: \(R = \{ (a, b) \mid a \text{ is a parent of } b \}\). This relation is asymmetric because if \((a, b) \in R\), implying that a is a parent of b, then \((b, a) \otin R\), meaning b cannot be a parent of a.
05

Conclusion

Thus, 'is a parent of' is an example of an asymmetric relation on the set of all people.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Relation in Set Theory
In mathematics, a relation is a concept where we compare elements of one set to elements of another. Think of a set as a collection of items, like a group of people. When we talk about a relation, we are usually interested in how elements within this group are connected or related to each other.

Relations can be defined in various ways, for example:
  • Reflexive: Every element in the set relates to itself.
  • Symmetric: If one element relates to another, then the second element relates back to the first.
  • Transitive: If one element relates to a second, and the second relates to a third, then the first relates to the third.
Understanding relations is fundamental in set theory and helps us grasp how different items in a set can interact. This groundwork is essential for exploring more complex properties like asymmetry and antisymmetry.
Antisymmetric Relation
Antisymmetric relations are a special type of relation. In simple terms, a relation is antisymmetric if, whenever one element relates to another and vice versa, then those elements must be identical.

Specifically, a relation R on a set A is antisymmetric if, for every pair of elements a and b in A, whenever both \( (a, b) \in R \) and \( (b, a) \in R \), it follows that a must be equal to b.

For example, let鈥檚 say we have a set of numbers, and the relation is 鈥渓ess than or equal to鈥. This relation is antisymmetric because if a <= b and b <= a, then a must equal b.

Here are some key points about antisymmetric relations:
  • They can still have pairs where an element is related to itself (reflexive).
  • If two different elements are related in both directions, it violates antisymmetry.
Understanding antisymmetry is important because it shows a certain kind of one-directional behavior even in relations that allow some form of mutual connection. It鈥檚 different from asymmetry, which we鈥檒l explore next.
Asymmetric Property
An asymmetric relation is different from an antisymmetric one. Asymmetry is stricter: if one element is related to another, the reverse can never be true.

Formally, a relation R on a set A is asymmetric if for every pair of elements, if \( (a, b) \in R \), then \( (b, a) \otin R \).

An easy way to remember this is that asymmetry means 'one-way only'. If a relates to b, b cannot relate back to a.

Consider the example from the provided solution: The relation 鈥榠s a parent of鈥 on the set of all people is asymmetric. If person A is a parent of person B, then person B cannot be a parent of person A. This relation clearly cannot be reversed, making it a perfect example of an asymmetric relation.

Here are some key points about asymmetric relations:
  • They are always non-symmetrical.
  • They imply a strict direction in the relationship.
  • An asymmetric relation does not self-relate; no element relates to itself.
In summary, while antisymmetric relations allow for mutual relationships under specific conditions, asymmetric relations don鈥檛 allow any mutual relationships at all, making them a straightforward and strict 'one-way' behavior.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the set of strings of lowercase English letters with lexicographic order is neither well-founded nor dense.

Exercises \(34-38\) deal with these relations on the set of real numbers: \(\begin{aligned} R_{1}=&\left\\{(a, b) \in \mathbf{R}^{2} | a>b\right\\}, \text { the greater than relation, } \\ R_{2}=&\left\\{(a, b) \in \mathbf{R}^{2} | a \geq b\right\\}, \text { the greater than or equal to relation, } \end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned} R_{3}=\left\\{(a, b) \in \mathbf{R}^{2} | a < b\right\\}, \text { the less than relation, } \\ R_{4}= \left\\{(a, b) \in \mathbf{R}^{2} | a \leq b\right\\}, \text { the less than or equal to relation, } \end{aligned}\) \(R_{5}=\left\\{(a, b) \in \mathbf{R}^{2} | a=b\right\\},\) the equal to relation, \(R_{6}=\left\\{(a, b) \in \mathbf{R}^{2} | a \neq b\right\\},\) the unequal to relation. Find the relations \(R_{i}^{2}\) for \(i=1,2,3,4,5,6\)

Each bead on a bracelet with three beads is either red, white, or blue, as illustrated in the figure shown. Define the relation \(R\) between bracelets as: \(\left(B_{1}, B_{2}\right)\) where \(B_{1}\) and \(B_{2}\) are bracelets, belongs to \(R\) if and only if \(B_{2}\) can be obtained from \(B_{1}\) by rotating it or rotating it and then reflecting it. a) Show that \(R\) is an equivalence relation. b) What are the equivalence classes of \(R ?\)

A relation \(R\) on the set \(A\) is irreflexive if for every \(a \in A,(a, a) \notin R .\) That is, \(R\) is irreflexive if no element in \(A\) is related to itself. Use quantifiers to express what it means for a relation to be irreflexive.

Let \(R\) be the relation on the set of all colorings of the \(2 \times 2\) checkerboard where each of the four squares is colored either red or blue so that \(\left(C_{1}, C_{2}\right),\) where \(C_{1}\) and \(C_{2}\) are \(2 \times 2\) checkerboards with each of their four squares colored blue or red, belongs to \(R\) if and only if \(C_{2}\) can be obtained from \(C_{1}\) either by rotating the checkerboard or by rotating it and then reflecting it. a) Show that \(R\) is an equivalence relation. b) What are the equivalence classes of \(R ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.