/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 a) Find the recurrence relation ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

a) Find the recurrence relation satisfied by \(R_{n},\) where \(R_{n}\) is the number of regions that a plane is divided into by \(n\) lines, if no two of the lines are parallel and no three of the lines go through the same point. b) Find \(R_{n}\) using iteration.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Recurrence Relation: \(R_{n} = R_{n-1} + n\). Explicit Formula: \(R_{n} = 1 + \frac{n(n+1)}{2}\).

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

The goal is to find the recurrence relation and then find an explicit formula for the number of regions, denoted as \(R_{n}\), formed by \(n\) lines on a plane.
02

Establish the Base Case

When there are no lines (\(n = 0\)), the plane is just one region. So, \(R_{0} = 1\).
03

Find the Recurrence Relation

Now we need to understand how adding a line affects the number of regions. When adding the first line, it divides the plane into 2 regions. Each additional line intersects all previous lines and adds as many new regions as the number of lines it intersects with. Thus, the recurrence relation can be written as: \[ R_{n} = R_{n-1} + n \]
04

Verify the Recurrence Relation

Let's verify by calculating the initial values manually: For \(n = 1\): A single line divides the plane into 2 regions, hence \(R_{1} = 2\). For \(n = 2\): Two lines divide the plane into 4 regions, hence \(R_{2} = 4\). For \(n = 3\): Three lines divide the plane into 7 regions, hence \(R_{3} = 7\). These values are consistent with the recurrence relation \(R_{n} = R_{n-1} + n\).
05

Iteration to Find Explicit Formula

We start with the base case and repeatedly apply the recurrence relation: \(R_{0} = 1\) \(R_{1} = R_{0} + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2\) \(R_{2} = R_{1} + 2 = 2 + 2 = 4\) \(R_{3} = R_{2} + 3 = 4 + 3 = 7\) Continue this process to understand the pattern. This shows that \(R_{n} = 1 + (1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n)\). Using the formula for the sum of the first \(n\) natural numbers, \( \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \), we get: \[ R_{n} = 1 + \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \]
06

Final Solution

The final formula for \( R_{n} \) is: \[R_{n} = 1 + \frac{n(n+1)}{2}\]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

discrete mathematics
Discrete mathematics is a branch of mathematics that deals with discrete elements, meaning distinct and separate values. Unlike continuous mathematics, which focuses on smooth and unbroken shapes, discrete mathematics studies objects like graphs, integers, and statements in logic.
The problem we are exploring about the number of regions divided by lines in a plane is a classic example in this field. It involves counting and understanding patterns, which are core concepts in discrete mathematics.
This area is vital for computer science, particularly in data structure and algorithm design, enabling efficient problem-solving and operations on discrete data sets.
mathematical induction
Mathematical induction is a powerful method of mathematical proof typically used to establish a given statement for all natural numbers. It involves two main steps: the base case and the inductive step.
In the context of the recurrence relation problem we solved, first, we established the base case, which was when there were zero lines resulting in one region ( R_{0} = 1).
Then, to form the inductive step, we assumed the relation holds for a certain number of lines, say 'k', and proved it for 'k+1'. This involved showing that adding one additional line increases the regions as predicted.
By combining the base case and the inductive step, mathematical induction proves the validity of our recurrence relation for any number of lines.
summation formulas
Summation formulas are mathematical tools used to find the sum of sequences quickly. In our plane region problem, identifying the sum of the first 'n' natural numbers was crucial.
The formula \( S = \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \) helps compute the total sum directly without manually adding each individual component.
In our recurrence problem, we found that R_{n} = 1 + \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \ by recognizing the pattern that the sum of natural numbers forms. Formulas like these are invaluable in simplifying and solving problems efficiently.
Understanding summation helps in a wide range of mathematical and real-world applications, such as calculating totals, progressions, and even areas under curves in some contexts.
plane geometry
Plane geometry is the study of figures on a flat surface, like points, lines, circles, and polygons. It contrasts with solid geometry, which deals with three-dimensional objects.
In our problem, we used plane geometry concepts to understand how 'n' lines intersect and divide a plane into different regions without parallel lines and without three lines meeting at a single point.
We visualized how each new line intersected all previous lines, increasing the number of regions step-by-step. Plane geometry provides the foundational visualization needed for solving such problems, enabling us to understand and predict patterns as more lines are added.
This area of mathematics is essential for fields such as engineering, architecture, and computer graphics, helping to design and analyze flat shapes and their properties.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

a) Show that 1\(/\left(1-x-x^{2}-x^{3}-x^{4}-x^{5}-x^{6}\right)\) is the generating function for the number of ways that the sum \(n\) can be obtained when a die is rolled repeatedly and the order of the rolls matters. b) Use part (a) to find the number of ways to roll a total of 8 when a die is rolled repeatedly, and the order of the rolls matters. (Use of a computer algebra package is advised.)

This exercise deals with the problem of finding the largest sum of consecutive terms of a sequence of n real numbers. When all terms are positive, the sum of all terms provides the answer, but the situation is more complicated when some terms are negative. For example, the maximum sum of consecutive terms of the sequence \(-2,3,-1,6,-7,4\) is \(3+(-1)+6=8 .\) (This exercise is based on \([\mathrm{Be} 86] .\) Recall that in Exercise 56 in Section 8.1 we developed a dynamic programming algorithm for solving this problem. Here, we first look at the brute-force algorithm for solving this problem; then we develop a divide- and-conquer algorithm for solving it. a) Use pseudocode to describe an algorithm that solves this problem by finding the sums of consecutive terms starting with the first term, the sums of consecutive terms starting with the second term, and so on, keeping track of the maximum sum found so far as the algorithm proceeds. b) Determine the computational complexity of the algorithm in part (a) in terms of the number of sums computed and the number of comparisons made. c) Devise a divide-and-conquer algorithm to solve this problem. [Hint: Assume that there are an even number of terms in the sequence and split the sequence into two halves. Explain how to handle the case when the maximum sum of consecutive terms includes terms in both halves.] d) Use the algorithm from part (c) to find the maximum sum of consecutive terms of each of the sequences: \(-2,4,-1,3,5,-6,1,2 ; 4,1,-3,7,-1,-5, \quad 3,-2 ;\) and \(-1,6,3,-4,-5,8,-1,7\) e) Find a recurrence relation for the number of sums and comparisons used by the divide-and-conquer algorithm from part (c). f ) Use the master theorem to estimate the computational complexity of the divide-and-conquer algorithm. How does it compare in terms of computational complexity with the algorithm from part (a)?

How many onto functions are there from a set with seven elements to one with five elements?

In how many ways can 25 identical donuts be distributed to four police officers so that each officer gets at least three but no more than seven donuts?

Give a combinatorial interpretation of the coefficient of \(x^{4}\) in the expansion \(\left(1+x+x^{2}+x^{3}+\cdots\right)^{3} .\) Use this interpretation to find this number.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.