/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 72 Show that it is possible to arra... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Show that it is possible to arrange the numbers \(1,2, \ldots, n\) in a row so that the average of any two of these numbers never appears between them. [Hint: Show that it suffices to prove this fact when \(n\) is a power of \(2 .\) Then use mathematical induction to prove the result when \(n\) is a power of 2.]

Short Answer

Expert verified
Use induction: show base case works for n=2, then assume for n=2^k, prove for n=2^{k+1}, by ensuring halves separated as sub-arranged sets meeting average constraints.

Step by step solution

01

- Understand the Problem

We need to arrange the numbers 1,2,... , n in a row so that the average of any two numbers does not appear between them. We aim to show it suffices to prove this when n is a power of 2.
02

- Base Case n=2

For n=2, the sequence is just 1,2. The average \( \frac{1 + 2}{2} = 1.5 \) which does not appear between them.
03

- Assume for n=2^k

Assume this is true for n=2^k. We assume we have a sequence of 2^k numbers, fulfilling the requirement.
04

- Prove for n=2^{k+1}

We need to show it works for 2^{k+1}. Divide the sequence into 2 halves: the first half numbers are 1,2,...,2^k and the next half are 2^k+1,...,2^{k+1}. Arrange these halves such that average conditions hold.
05

- Arrange 2^k Numbers

Arrange the first half in increasing order and the second half in an increasing order. This way, averages within halves never appear between others. E.g., for 8 numbers formed from two 4 number sets each.
06

- Verify Average Between Halves

If \(a \eq b\) belong across halves (one from each half), their positions prevent averages showing between halves due to arithmetic aligning symmetric boundary.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Arrangement of Numbers
In this exercise, we need to arrange the numbers from 1 to n in a row. The goal is to set these numbers so that the average of any two numbers does not show up between them. For instance, if you have numbers 1, 2, ..., n in a sequence, we want to make sure that for any two numbers a and b, their average (a + b)/2 isn't a number that falls between a and b in the arrangement.
This might sound a bit tricky, but it's very doable. The secret lies in how we've arranged the numbers. We start small and prove the arrangement works for small cases before proving it works in a general way for any number n that's a power of 2.
In our example, we'll use a method called 'proof by induction' to establish that it works for all n that are powers of two. This involves showing it's true for a base case, then proving that if it's true for one case, it's true for the next.
Average
The concept of 'average' is straightforward: it's the sum of two numbers divided by two. For any two numbers a and b, their average is calculated as (a + b)/2.
In our problem, we need to ensure this average does not lie between the numbers a and b when arranged in a specific order. Let's see an example: If you have numbers 1 and 2, their average is (1 + 2)/2 = 1.5, which isn't an integer and doesn't appear as a number between 1 and 2. For larger sets of numbers, this gets more complicated, and that's why we're focusing on powers of two.
Understanding the average is crucial here because it directly influences how we position numbers in a sequence, ensuring no unintended averages appear where they shouldn't.
Powers of Two
Powers of two are numbers of the form 2, 4, 8, 16, and so on, represented as 2^k where k is a whole number. Why do we focus on powers of two in our solution? Because they allow us to use mathematical properties to split and arrange numbers effectively. For example, with 2^k numbers, we can split them into two halves of equal size and apply our averaging rules within each half.
Imagine we have n = 4 (2^2) as a sequence of numbers: 1, 2, 3, and 4. We can prove that their averages don't fall between any two numbers by checking each possibility. More importantly, if this holds, we can argue that the same logic applies as we double the size to n = 8 (2^3), using the concept of induction.
Proof by Induction
Mathematical induction is a powerful proof technique. It involves two steps: the base case and the inductive step.
First, we prove the base case: n=2. For n=2, the sequence is simply 1,2. The average is (1+2)/2 = 1.5, which is not a whole number, thus not appearing in the sequence. This base case holds.
Then, we proceed with the inductive step. Let's assume our statement is true for some n=2^k. We have a sequence of 2^k numbers arranged such that no averages fall between their respective numbers. Now, we must show it holds for the next case, n=2^{k+1}. We split this sequence into two halves: 1 to 2^k and 2^k + 1 to 2^{k+1}. We arrange these two halves such that any average within each half or between these halves never appears between any pair of numbers.
By successfully showing both the base case and inductive step hold, we conclude that our statement is true for all n that are powers of two using proof by induction.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use mathematical induction in Exercises \(38-46\) to prove results about sets. Prove that a set with \(n\) elements has \(n(n-1) / 2\) subsets containing exactly two elements whenever \(n\) is an integer greater than or equal to \(2 .\)

Suppose there are \(n\) people in a group, each aware of a scandal no one else in the group knows about. These people communicate by telephone; when two people in the group talk, they share information about all scandals each knows about. For example, on the first call, two people share information, so by the end of the call, each of these people knows about two scandals. The gossip problem asks for \(G(n),\) the minimum number of telephone calls that are needed for all \(n\) people to learn about all the scandals. Exercises \(69-71\) deal with the gossip problem. Use mathematical induction to prove that \(G(n) \leq 2 n-4\) for \(n \geq 4 .\) [Hint: In the inductive step, have a new person call a particular person at the start and at the end. \(]\)

Pick's theorem says that the area of a simple polygon \(P\) in the plane with vertices that are all lattice points (that is, points with integer coordinates) equals \(I(P)+B(P) / 2-1\) where \(I(P)\) and \(B(P)\) are the number of lattice points in the interior of \(P\) and on the boundary of \(P,\) respectively. Use strong induction on the number of vertices of \(P\) to prove Pick's theorem. [Hint: For the basis step, first prove the theorem for rectangles, then for right triangles, and finally for all triangles by noting that the area of a tri- angle is the area of a larger rectangle containing it with the areas of at most three triangles subtracted. For the inductive step, take advantage of Lemma \(1 . ]\)

Verify that the program segment $$ \begin{array}{c}{x :=2} \\ {z :=x+y} \\ {\text { if } y>0 \text { then }} \\\ {z :=z+1} \\ {\text { else }} \\ {z :=0}\end{array} $$ is correct with respect to the initial assertion \(y=3\) and the final assertion \(z=6\)

Sometimes we cannot use mathematical induction to prove a result we believe to be true, but we can use mathematical induction to prove a stronger result. Because the inductive hypothesis of the stronger result provides more to work with, this process is called inductive loading. We use inductive loading in Exercise \(74-76\) . Suppose that we want to prove that $$ \sum_{j=1}^{n} j /(j+1) !<1 $$ for all positive integers \(n .\) a) Show that if we try to prove this inequality using mathematical induction, the basis step works, but the inductive step fails. b) Show that mathematical induction can be used to prove the stronger inequality $$ \sum_{j=1}^{n} j /(j+1) ! \leq 1-1 /(n+1) ! $$ for all positive integers \(n,\) implying that the weaker inequality is also true.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.