/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 27 Use mathematical induction to pr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use mathematical induction to prove the inequalities in Exercises \(18-30 .\) Prove that for every positive integer \(n,\) \(\quad 1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}+\cdots+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}>2(\sqrt{n+1}-1)\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The inequality holds for all positive integers \(n\) by mathematical induction.

Step by step solution

01

Base Case

For the base case, test the inequality for the smallest positive integer, which is typically 1.\[ \text{When } n = 1: \] \[ 1 > 2(\sqrt{1+1} - 1) \] \[ 1 > 2(\sqrt{2} - 1) \] The right side simplifies to approximately 0.828, so the inequality holds for the base case.
02

Inductive Hypothesis

Assume the statement is true for some positive integer \(k\), i.e., \[ 1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} + \cdots + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} > 2(\sqrt{k+1} - 1) \] This assumption needs to be used to prove that the statement holds for \(k + 1\).
03

Inductive Step

Use the inductive hypothesis to prove that \[ 1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} + \cdots + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k+1}} > 2(\sqrt{k+2} - 1) \] Since \(1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} + \cdots + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} > 2(\sqrt{k+1} - 1)\) from the inductive hypothesis, add \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{k+1}}\) to both sides: \[ 1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} + \cdots + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k+1}} > 2(\sqrt{k+1} - 1) + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k+1}} \]
04

Simplifying the Inductive Step

Combine like terms on the right side. Observe that \(\sqrt{k+1} + \frac{1}{2(\sqrt{k+1})} > \sqrt{k+2}\) because \(\sqrt{k+2} = \sqrt{k+1 + 1}\) which is greater than or equal to \(\sqrt{k+1}\), and adding \(\frac{1}{2(\sqrt{k+1})}\) pushes it further. Then proving: \[ 2(\sqrt{k+1}) + \frac{2}{2(\sqrt{k+1})} - 2 > 2\sqrt{k+2} - 2 \] simplifies to: \[ 2(\sqrt{k+2} - 1 ) \]
05

Conclusion

Thus, the induction step holds, meaning that assuming the inequality is true for \(n=k\) implies it is true for \(n=k+1\). Since the base case held true and the inductive step has been proven valid, by the principle of mathematical induction, \[ 1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} + \cdots+ \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} > 2(\sqrt{n+1} - 1) \] is true for every positive integer \(n\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Base Case
In mathematical induction, the base case is the starting point. It is where we verify that our statement or inequality is true for the initial value, typically for the smallest positive integer.
For our specific problem, we start by proving the inequality for \(n = 1\).
When \(n = 1\), our inequality becomes:
\[ 1 > 2(\sqrt{1+1} - 1)\] Simplifying the right side:
\[2 \times (\sqrt{2} - 1) \approx 0.828\] Since 1 is indeed greater than approximately 0.828, the inequality holds true for the base case. It means we can move to the next step with confidence that our base case is correct.
Inductive Hypothesis
After establishing the base case, the next step in mathematical induction is to assume that our statement or inequality is true for some positive integer \(k\).
This assumption is what we call the inductive hypothesis.
For our problem, we assume that:
\[1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} + \text{...} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} > 2(\sqrt{k+1} - 1)\]
This step is crucial because it sets up the framework for us to prove that if this assumption holds for the positive integer \(k\) (inductive hypothesis), then it should also hold for the next integer \(k+1\). This bridging step links the base case to all subsequent positive integers.
Inductive Step
The inductive step is the heart of mathematical induction. Here, we use the inductive hypothesis to prove the statement for \(k + 1\).
For our problem, we need to show that:
\[1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} + \text{...} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k+1}} > 2(\sqrt{k+2} - 1)\]
We start by using our inductive hypothesis:
\[1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} + \text{...} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} > 2(\sqrt{k+1} - 1)\] Then, add \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{k+1}}\) to both sides:
\[ 1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} + \text{...} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k+1}} > 2(\sqrt{k+1} - 1) + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k+1}} \]
By simplifying the right side, we focus on showing whether the left side surpasses the required expression, establishing that our inequality is maintained when extended to \(k+1\).
Combining terms and comparing expressions helps solidify this step.
Inequalities
Throughout mathematical induction, especially when dealing with inequalities, precision is key.
We constantly compare quantities to ensure one side is greater than or less than the other based on our hypotheses and logical progression.
In our example, inequality manipulation and simplification verify that our statement holds.
Simplifying inequalities often involves breaking them down into smaller steps or components that we already understand and proving each part logically.
  • Always analyze both sides carefully.
  • Use established mathematical rules for simplifying and comparing.
By ensuring each part maintains the inequality correctly, we solidify our mathematical proof. The principle of mathematical induction lets us extend truth from the smallest value to any positive integer, supported meticulously at each step.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sometimes we cannot use mathematical induction to prove a result we believe to be true, but we can use mathematical induction to prove a stronger result. Because the inductive hypothesis of the stronger result provides more to work with, this process is called inductive loading. We use inductive loading in Exercise \(74-76\) . Suppose that we want to prove that $$ \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{3}{4} \cdots \frac{2 n-1}{2 n}<\frac{1}{\sqrt{3 n}} $$ for all positive integers \(n .\) a) Show that if we try to prove this inequality using mathematical induction, the basis step works, but the inductive step fails. b) Show that mathematical induction can be used to prove the stronger inequality $$ \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{3}{4} \dots \frac{2 n-1}{2 n}<\frac{1}{\sqrt{3 n+1}} $$ for all integers \(n\) greater than \(1,\) which, together with a verification for the case where \(n=1\) , establishes the weaker inequality we originally tried to prove using mathematical induction.

Use structural induction to prove that \(\left(w_{1} w_{2}\right)^{R}=w_{2}^{R} w_{1}^{R}\)

Use the principle of mathematical induction to show that \(P(n)\) is true for \(n=b, b+1, b+2, \ldots,\) where \(b\) is an integer, if \(P(b)\) is true and the conditional statement \(P(k) \rightarrow\) \(P(k+1)\) is true for all integers \(k\) with \(k \geq b\) .

Deal with values of iterated functions. Suppose that \(f(n)\) is a function from the set of real numbers, or positive real numbers, or some other set of real numbers, to the set of real numbers such that \(f(n)\) is monotonically increasing [that is, \(f(n)< f(m)\) when \(n< m )\) and \(f(n)< n\) for all \(n\) in the domain of \(f . ]\) The function \(f^{(k)}(n)\) is defined recursively by $$f^{(k)}(n)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll}{n} & {\text { if } k=0} \\\ {f\left(f^{(k-1)}(n)\right)} & {\text { if } k>0}\end{array}\right.$$ Furthermore, let \(c\) be a positive real number. The iterated function \(f_{c}^{*}\) is the number of iterations of \(f\) required to reduce its argument to \(c\) or less, so \(f_{c}^{*}(n)\) is the smallest nonnegative integer \(k\) such that \(f^{k}(n) \leq c\). Let \(f(n)=n / 2 .\) Find a formula for \(f^{(k)}(n) .\) What is the value of \(f_{1}^{*}(n)\) when \(n\) is a positive integer?

A guest at a party is a celebrity if this person is known by every other guest, but knows none of them. There is at most one celebrity at a party, for if there were two, they would know each other. A particular party may have no celebrity. Your assignment is to find the celebrity, if one exists, at a party, by asking only one type of question asking a guest whether they know a second guest. Everyone must answer your questions truthfully. That is, if Alice and Bob are two people at the party, you can ask Alice whether she knows Bob; she must answer correctly. Use mathematical induction to show that if there are \(n\) people at the party, then you can find the celebrity, if there is one, with 3\((n-1)\) questions. [Hint: First ask a question to eliminate one person as a celebrity. Then use the inductive hypothesis to identify a potential celebrity. Finally, ask two more questions to determine whether that person is actually a celebrity. \(]\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.