/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 Suppose that during the most rec... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Suppose that during the most recent fiscal year, the annual revenue of Acme Computer was 138 billion dollars and its net profit was 8 billion dollars, the annual revenue of Nadir Software was 87 billion dollars and its net profit was 5 billion dollars, and the annual revenue of Quixote Media was 111 billion dollars and its net profit was 13 billion dollars. Determine the truth value of each of these propositions for the most recent fiscal year. a) Quixote Media had the largest annual revenue. b) Nadir Software had the lowest net profit and Acme Computer had the largest annual revenue. c) Acme Computer had the largest net profit or Quixote Media had the largest net profit. d) If Quixote Media had the smallest net profit, then Acme Computer had the largest annual revenue. e) Nadir Software had the smallest net profit if and only if Acme Computer had the largest annual revenue.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) False, (b) True, (c) True, (d) True, (e) True.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem and Given Data

First, extract the provided data. Acme Computer has an annual revenue of 138 billion dollars and a net profit of 8 billion dollars. Nadir Software has an annual revenue of 87 billion dollars and a net profit of 5 billion dollars. Quixote Media has an annual revenue of 111 billion dollars and a net profit of 13 billion dollars.
02

Analyzing Proposition (a)

Compare the annual revenues. Acme Computer: 138 billion, Nadir Software: 87 billion, Quixote Media: 111 billion. Acme Computer has the largest revenue, so proposition (a) is false.
03

Analyzing Proposition (b)

Verify if Nadir Software has the lowest net profit and Acme Computer has the largest annual revenue. Nadir Software's net profit: 5 billion, Acme Computer's annual revenue: 138 billion. Both statements are true, so proposition (b) is true.
04

Analyzing Proposition (c)

Check if either Acme Computer or Quixote Media had the largest net profit. Acme Computer's net profit: 8 billion, Quixote Media's net profit: 13 billion. Quixote Media had the largest net profit, so the disjunction proposition (c) is true.
05

Analyzing Proposition (d)

Examine the conditional statement. Quixote Media did not have the smallest net profit, so the antecedent is false. When the antecedent is false, the whole conditional statement is true, so proposition (d) is true.
06

Analyzing Proposition (e)

Check the bi-conditional statement. Nadir Software had the smallest net profit: true. Acme Computer had the largest annual revenue: true. Both parts are true, so the bi-conditional statement is true, making proposition (e) true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Truth Value
In discrete mathematics, the truth value of a proposition is essentially its true or false status. Each proposition in logic can either be true (T) or false (F). Here鈥檚 a quick rundown of the relevant scenarios in the problem:

鈥 Acme Computer had the largest annual revenue, so the proposition that Quixote Media had the largest revenue is false.
鈥 Nadir Software had the smallest net profit and Acme Computer had the largest annual revenue, making the proposition true since both statements hold.
鈥 Quixote Media had the largest net profit which makes the disjunction about Acme Computer or Quixote Media having the largest net profit true.
鈥 If Quixote Media had the smallest net profit, Acme Computer had the largest annual revenue is a conditional statement and even with a false antecedent, makes the statement true.
鈥 Nadir Software had the smallest net profit if and only if Acme Computer had the largest annual revenue. Since both parts are true, the bi-conditional statement stands true.

Understanding the truth value forms the foundation for analyzing more complex logical statements like conditionals and bi-conditionals.
Conditional Statements
A conditional statement, also referred to as an implication, is a statement of the form 'If P, then Q', written as P 鈫 Q. Here, P is called the antecedent and Q is called the consequent. The truth value of a conditional statement depends on its parts:

鈥 If the antecedent (P) is true and the consequent (Q) is true, the conditional statement is true.
鈥 If the antecedent (P) is true and the consequent (Q) is false, the conditional statement is false.
鈥 If the antecedent (P) is false, the conditional statement is always true, regardless of the truth value of the consequent (Q).

In our exercise:
鈥 Statement (d) is 'If Quixote Media had the smallest net profit, then Acme Computer had the largest annual revenue.'
The antecedent (Quixote Media had the smallest net profit) is false because Quixote Media actually had the largest net profit.
Thus, the whole conditional statement is true because a false antecedent makes the entire conditional true regardless of the consequent.
Bi-conditional Statements
A bi-conditional statement is expressed as 'P if and only if Q', written P 鈫 Q. It means that both P and Q are true together, or both are false together. The bi-conditional is true if both components share the same truth value.

For example, in the exercise:
鈥 Statement (e) is 'Nadir Software had the smallest net profit if and only if Acme Computer had the largest annual revenue.'
Checking the truth values, we know:
鈥 Nadir Software did indeed have the smallest net profit (True)
鈥 Acme Computer did indeed have the largest annual revenue (True)
Since both parts are true, the bi-conditional statement is true.

Understanding bi-conditional statements helps in forming precise logical equivalencies in mathematical proofs and logical arguments.
Disjunction
A disjunction is a logical operation that combines two propositions using 'or', represented as P 鈭 Q. A disjunction is true if at least one of the propositions is true:

鈥 If both P and Q are true, P 鈭 Q is true.
鈥 If P is true and Q is false, P 鈭 Q is true.
鈥 If P is false and Q is true, P 鈭 Q is true.
鈥 If both P and Q are false, P 鈭 Q is false.

In our problem:
鈥 Statement (c) is 'Acme Computer had the largest net profit or Quixote Media had the largest net profit.'
Checking the data:
鈥 Acme Computer had a net profit of 8 billion (False for largest net profit)
鈥 Quixote Media had a net profit of 13 billion (True for largest net profit)
Since Quixote Media had the largest net profit, at least one part of the disjunction is true, making the entire statement true.

Disjunctions are fundamental in understanding logical connections where multiple conditions might satisfy a given criteria.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises \(61-64\) are based on questions found in the book Symbolic Logic by Lewis Carroll. Let P(x), Q(x), R(x), and S(x) be the statements 鈥渪 is a duck,鈥 鈥渪 is one of my poultry,鈥 鈥渪 is an officer,鈥 and 鈥渪 is willing to waltz,鈥 respectively. Express each of these statements using quantifiers; logical connectives; and P(x), Q(x), R(x), and S(x). a) No ducks are willing to waltz. b) No officers ever decline to waltz. c) All my poultry are ducks. d) My poultry are not officers. e) Does (d) follow from (a), (b), and (c)? If not, is there a correct conclusion?

Suppose that the domain of \(Q(x, y, z)\) consists of triples \(x, y, z,\) where \(x=0,1,\) or \(2, y=0\) or \(1,\) and \(z=0\) or \(1 .\) Write out these propositions using disjunctions and conjunctions. $$ \begin{array}{ll}{\text { a) } \forall y Q(0, y, 0)} & {\text { b) } \exists x Q(x, 1,1)} \\ {\text { c) } \exists z \neg Q(0,0, z)} & {\text { d) } \exists x \neg Q(x, 0,1)}\end{array} $$

Exercises \(40-44\) deal with the translation between system specification and logical expressions involving quantifiers. Express each of these system specifications using predicates, quantifiers, and logical connectives. a) Every user has access to an electronic mailbox. b) The system mailbox can be accessed by everyone in the group if the file system is locked. c) The firewall is in a diagnostic state only if the proxy server is in a diagnostic state. d) At least one router is functioning normally if the throughput is between 100 kbps and 500 kbps and the proxy server is not in diagnostic mode.

Find a counterexample, if possible, to these universally quantified statements, where the domain for all variables consists of all real numbers. $$ \begin{array}{ll}{\text { a) } \forall x\left(x^{2} \neq x\right)} & {\text { b) } \forall x\left(x^{2} \neq 2\right)} \\ {\text { c) } \forall x(|x|>0)} \end{array} $$

Let \(S=x_{1} y_{1}+x_{2} y_{2}+\cdots+x_{n} y_{n},\) where \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) and \(y_{1}, y_{2}, \ldots, y_{n}\) are orderings of two different sequences of positive real numbers, each containing \(n\) elements. a) Show that \(S\) takes its maximum value over all orderings of the two sequences when both sequences are sorted (so that the elements in each sequence are in nondecreasing order). b) Show that \(S\) takes its minimum value over all orderings of the two sequences when one sequence is sorted into nondecreasing order and the other is sorted into nonincreasing order.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.