/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 63 Exercises \(61-64\) are based on... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Exercises \(61-64\) are based on questions found in the book Symbolic Logic by Lewis Carroll. Let P(x), Q(x), R(x), and S(x) be the statements 鈥渪 is a baby,鈥 鈥渪 is logical,鈥 鈥渪 is able to manage a crocodile,鈥 and 鈥渪 is despised,鈥 respectively. Suppose that the domain consists of all people. Express each of these statements using quantifiers; logical connectives; and P(x), Q(x), R(x), and S(x). a) Babies are illogical. b) Nobody is despised who can manage a crocodile. c) Illogical persons are despised. d) Babies cannot manage crocodiles. e) Does (d) follow from (a), (b), and (c)? If not, is there a correct conclusion?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(d) follows from (a), (b), and (c).

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Statements

Identify what P(x), Q(x), R(x), and S(x) represent:- P(x): x is a baby- Q(x): x is logical- R(x): x is able to manage a crocodile- S(x): x is despised
02

Translate each statement into logical expressions

Translate each of the given statements into logical expressions.
03

Translate 'a) Babies are illogical'

Babies being illogical means for all x, if x is a baby, then x is not logical. This can be expressed as: \[ \forall x (P(x) \rightarrow eg Q(x)) \]
04

Translate 'b) Nobody is despised who can manage a crocodile'

If someone can manage a crocodile, then they are not despised. This can be expressed as: \[ \forall x (R(x) \rightarrow eg S(x)) \]
05

Translate 'c) Illogical persons are despised'

If someone is not logical, then they are despised. This can be expressed as: \[ \forall x (eg Q(x) \rightarrow S(x)) \]
06

Translate 'd) Babies cannot manage crocodiles'

If x is a baby, then x cannot manage a crocodile. This can be expressed as: \[ \forall x (P(x) \rightarrow eg R(x)) \]
07

Determine if 'd) follows from (a), (b), and (c)'

Consider the logical expressions from (a), (b), and (c):(a) \[ \forall x (P(x) \rightarrow eg Q(x)) \](b) \[ \forall x (R(x) \rightarrow eg S(x)) \](c) \[ \forall x (eg Q(x) \rightarrow S(x)) \]Check if these imply (d):\[ \forall x (P(x) \rightarrow eg R(x)) \]Using (a), if x is a baby, then x is illogical.Using (c), if x is illogical, x is despised.From (a) and (c), if x is a baby, x is despised.From (b), if x can manage a crocodile, then x is not despised, which contradicts x being despised.Hence, a baby cannot manage a crocodile.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Expressions
In symbolic logic, logical expressions are used to represent statements or propositions clearly and precisely. Logical expressions often involve variables and logical connectives to form complex statements. Suppose we have the statements: P(x): 'x is a baby', Q(x): 'x is logical', R(x): 'x is able to manage a crocodile', and S(x): 'x is despised'. We can use these statements along with logical connective symbols to express more complex ideas. For example, 'Babies are illogical' translates to the expression \(\forall x (P(x) \rightarrow eg Q(x))\). This means that for every person (x), if that person is a baby, then that person is not logical.
Quantifiers
Quantifiers are symbols that indicate the scope of a term in a logical expression. The two most common quantifiers are the universal quantifier \( \forall \), which means 'for all', and the existential quantifier \( \exists \), which means 'there exists'. In the context of our exercise, the universal quantifier is used to apply a statement to all individuals in a domain. For example, 'Nobody is despised who can manage a crocodile' can be written as \( \forall x (R(x) \rightarrow eg S(x)) \). This means for every person x, if x can manage a crocodile, then x is not despised. Using quantifiers helps us precisely express statements that apply to all or some elements of a set.
Logical Connectives
Logical connectives are symbols or words used to connect two or more propositions in a logical way. Common logical connectives include: \( \land \) (and), \( \lor \) (or), \( \rightarrow \) (implies), and \( \eg \) (not). For instance, the statement 'Illogical persons are despised' can be translated to \ ( \forall x (eg Q(x) \rightarrow S(x)) \ ). Here, \( \eg \) denotes logical negation, and \( \rightarrow \) denotes implication. It means that for all x, if x is not logical, then x is despised. Understanding how to use logical connectives is crucial for forming and interpreting logical statements correctly.
Symbolic Logic Translation
Symbolic logic translation involves converting verbal statements into formal logical expressions. This translation lets us analyze and manipulate statements using the rules of logic. For example, the statement 'Babies cannot manage crocodiles' translates into \( \forall x (P(x) \rightarrow eg R(x)) \). This means for every person x, if x is a baby, then x cannot manage a crocodile. This translation is helpful because it allows us to check dependencies and implications between different statements rigorously. It also enables us to deduce new information logically. In the exercise, after translating statements (a) through (d) into their symbolic forms, we were able to determine if (d) followed logically from (a), (b), and (c).

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises \(48-51\) establish rules for null quantification that we can use when a quantified variable does not appear in part of a statement. Establish these logical equivalences, where \(x\) does not occur as a free variable in \(A\) . Assume that the domain is nonempty. $$ \begin{array}{l}{\text { a) }(\forall x P(x)) \wedge A \equiv \forall x(P(x) \wedge A)} \\ {\text { b) }(\exists x P(x)) \wedge A \equiv \exists x(P(x) \wedge A)}\end{array} $$

Write the numbers \(1,2, \ldots, 2 n\) on a blackboard, where \(n\) is an odd integer. Pick any two of the numbers, \(j\) and \(k,\) write \(|j-k|\) on the board and erase \(j\) and \(k\) . Continue this process until only one integer is written on the board. Prove that this integer must be odd.

Let \(S=x_{1} y_{1}+x_{2} y_{2}+\cdots+x_{n} y_{n},\) where \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) and \(y_{1}, y_{2}, \ldots, y_{n}\) are orderings of two different sequences of positive real numbers, each containing \(n\) elements. a) Show that \(S\) takes its maximum value over all orderings of the two sequences when both sequences are sorted (so that the elements in each sequence are in nondecreasing order). b) Show that \(S\) takes its minimum value over all orderings of the two sequences when one sequence is sorted into nondecreasing order and the other is sorted into nonincreasing order.

Express each of these statements using predicates and quantifiers. a) A passenger on an airline qualifies as an elite flyer if the passenger flies more than 25,000 miles in a year or takes more than 25 flights during that year. b) A man qualifies for the marathon if his best previous time is less than 3 hours and a woman qualifies for the marathon if her best previous time is less than 3.5 hours. c) A student must take at least 60 course hours, or at least 45 course hours and write a master鈥檚 thesis, and receive a grade no lower than a B in all required courses, to receive a master鈥檚 degree. d) There is a student who has taken more than 21 credit hours in a semester and received all A鈥檚.

Use forward reasoning to show that if \(x\) is a nonzero real number, then \(x^{2}+1 / x^{2} \geq 2 .[\text { Hint: Start with the in- }\) equality \((x-1 / x)^{2} \geq 0,\) which holds for all nonzero real numbers \(x . ]\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.