/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 Translate these statements into ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Translate these statements into English, where the domain for each variable consists of all real numbers a) \(\exists x \forall y(x y=y)\) b) \(\forall x \forall y(((x \geq 0) \wedge(y<0)) \rightarrow(x-y>0))\) c) \(\forall x \forall y \exists z(x=y+z)\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) There exists a real number x such that for all real numbers y, x times y equals y. b) For all real numbers x and y, if x is non-negative and y is negative, then x minus y is positive. c) For all real numbers x and y, there exists a real number z such that x equals y plus z.

Step by step solution

01

Translate the individual components (Part a)

Translate \(\forall y (x y = y)\) to English. It means: For every real number y, x multiplied by y equals y.
02

Combine components (Part a)

Combine \(\forall y (x y = y)\) with \(\exists x\). It means: There exists a real number x such that for every real number y, x multiplied by y equals y.
03

Full translation (Part a)

The final English translation for Part a is: 'There exists a real number x such that for all real numbers y, x times y equals y.'
04

Translate the components (Part b)

Translate \(\forall x \forall y ((x \geq 0) \wedge (y < 0) \rightarrow (x - y > 0))\) to English. It states: For all real numbers x and y, if x is greater than or equal to 0 and y is less than 0, then x minus y is greater than 0.
05

Full translation (Part b)

Combine the components to translate fully: 'For all real numbers x and y, if x is non-negative and y is negative, then x minus y is positive.'
06

Translate the components (Part c)

Translate \(\forall x \forall y \exists z (x = y + z)\) to English. It means: For every pair of real numbers x and y, there exists a real number z such that x equals y plus z.
07

Full translation (Part c)

Combine the components to translate fully: 'For all real numbers x and y, there exists a real number z such that x equals y plus z.'

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

quantifiers
In logic and mathematics, quantifiers play a crucial role in defining the scope of a variable in a statement. Quantifiers allow us to make precise claims about variables. There are two main types of quantifiers:
  • Existential quantifier (∃): This quantifier expresses that there is at least one element in the domain that satisfies a given property. It is written as ∃, followed by a variable. For example, ∃x means 'there exists an x'.
  • Universal quantifier (∀): This quantifier asserts that a property holds for all elements in the domain. It is written as ∀, followed by a variable. For example, ∀x means 'for all x'.

Understanding how to work with quantifiers is key to translating logical expressions into English, as seen in the given exercise. For instance, in statement (a) \(\textstyle \exists x \forall y(x y=y)\), \( \exists x \) indicates that we need to find at least one real number x such that for every real number y, the product of x and y equals y. This not only requires recognition of the quantifiers but also the ability to apply their meaning in context.
real numbers
Real numbers include all the numbers on the number line. This means they encompass both rational numbers (like 3, 1/2, or -4) and irrational numbers (like √2 or π). In the context of the given exercise, the domain for the variables consists of all real numbers.

When we say that variables like x, y, and z are real numbers, we are implying that they can take any value within this continuous set. For example, in Part (b) of the exercise: ∀x ∀y (((x ≥ 0) ∧ (y < 0)) → (x - y > 0)). This is a statement about all possible real numbers (x and y). It means that if x is any non-negative real number and y is any negative real number, then x - y will always be positive.
predicate logic
Predicate logic extends propositional logic by dealing with predicates, which are statements that contain variables. These predicates become true or false depending on the values of these variables. Predicate logic also incorporates quantifiers, and is used to express more complex statements about mathematical objects.

Let’s take Part (c) of the exercise: \(\forall x \forall y \exists z (x = y + z)\) as an example. The predicate here is x = y + z, which involves three variables. The existential quantifier (∃z) states that for each pair of real numbers x and y, there exists a real number z that satisfies the equation. Predicate logic enables us to construct such statements rigorously and to reason about their truth.

Understanding predicate logic allows us to break down these statements into more manageable parts and translates them into clear, meaningful sentences in English. This capability is essential for anyone looking to deeply understand mathematical logic.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prove that if \(x, y,\) and \(z\) are integers and \(x+y+z\) is odd then at least one of \(x, y,\) and \(z\) is odd.

Determine the truth value of each of these statements if the domain consists of all integers. $$ \begin{array}{ll}{\text { a) } \forall n(n+1>n)} & {\text { b) } \exists n(2 n=3 n)} \\ {\text { c) } \exists n(n=-n)} & {\text { d) } \forall n(3 n \leq 4 n)}\end{array} $$

Determine whether this argument, taken from Kalish and Montague [KaMo64], is valid. If Superman were able and willing to prevent evil, he would do so. If Superman were unable to prevent evil, he would be impotent; if he were unwilling to prevent evil, he would be malevolent. Superman does not prevent evil. If Superman exists, he is neither impotent nor malevolent. Therefore, Superman does not exist.

Express each of these system specifications using predicates, quantifiers, and logical connectives, if necessary. a) At least one console must be accessible during every fault condition. b) The e-mail address of every user can be retrieved whenever the archive contains at least one message sent by every user on the system. c) For every security breach there is at least one mechanism that can detect that breach if and only if there is a process that has not been compromised. d) There are at least two paths connecting every two distinct endpoints on the network. e) No one knows the password of every user on the system except for the system administrator, who knows all passwords.

Use quantifiers and predicates with more than one variable to express these statements. a) Every computer science student needs a course in discrete mathematics. b) There is a student in this class who owns a personal computer. c) Every student in this class has taken at least one computer science course. d) There is a student in this class who has taken at least one course in computer science. e) Every student in this class has been in every building on campus. f ) There is a student in this class who has been in every room of at least one building on campus. g) Every student in this class has been in at least one room of every building on campus.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.