/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 1\. Determine whether each of th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

1\. Determine whether each of the following sentences is a statement. a) In 2003 George W. Bush was the president of the United States, b) \(x+3\) is a positive integer. c) Fifteen is an even number. d) If Jennifer is late for the party, then her cousin Zachary will be quite angry. e) What time is it? f) As of June 30,2003 , Christine Marie Evert had won the French Open a record seven times.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Yes, because it is a verifiable fact; b) No, because it depends on the value of \(x\); c) Yes, because it is a understandable fact, albeit false; d) Unclear, depends on the context and if we have information about the situation; e) No, because it is not asserting a fact, instead it is a question; f) Yes, because it is a verifiable fact.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze Sentence a

The sentence 'In 2003 George W. Bush was the president of the United States' is a historical fact. It can be verifiably confirmed as true. Therefore, it is a statement.
02

Analyze Sentence b

The sentence '\(x+3\) is a positive integer' is not necessarily a statement. This is because we don't have enough information to confirm if it is true or false as it depends on the value of \(x\). If \(x\) is equal to -2, then \(x+3\) equals an integer, but if \(x\) equals -5, then \(x+3\) does not equal an integer.
03

Analyze Sentence c

'Fifteen is an even number' is a mathematical statement and it is false because fifteen is an odd number not an even. Thus, it is a statement.
04

Analyze Sentence d

'If Jennifer is late for the party, then her cousin Zachary will be quite angry' is a hypothetical statement. As long as it is established whether either Jennifer is late or Zachary is angry, this can be classified as a statement. Assuming we don't have that information, it cannot be classified as a statement.
05

Analyze Sentence e

'What time is it?' is a question, not a statement. It cannot be classified as either true or false because it does not assert anything definite.
06

Analyze Sentence f

'As of June 30,2003 , Christine Marie Evert had won the French Open a record seven times' is a historical fact. It can be verifiably confirmed as true. Therefore, it is a statement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statements in Logic
In mathematical logic, understanding whether a sentence is a statement is crucial. A statement, in this context, is a sentence that declares something that can be regarded as either true or false. It is not just about information alone; it is about making a definitive claim. For example, in the exercise provided, certain sentences like 'In 2003 George W. Bush was the president of the United States' are considered statements because they clearly express a factual reality that can be validated.
Statements do not include questions, exclamations, or commands. For example, asking 'What time is it?' is not a statement because it does not assert a truth value. Additionally, sentences like 'If Jennifer is late for the party, then her cousin Zachary will be quite angry' can be statements only if more information is provided to establish their truth or falsehood. This involves assessing hypothetical conditions and outcomes.
True or False Sentences
In logic, true or false sentences are fundamental to building logical conclusions. A sentence is true if it reflects reality or an accepted fact, and false if it contradicts reality. For example, the statement 'Fifteen is an even number' is false, due to the arithmetic rule that classifies fifteen as an odd number. Recognizing such inconsistencies in mathematical statements helps in verifying data integrity.
In logical problems, discerning the truth value of statements involves more than just superficial evaluation. It requires analyzing the context and the content. For instance, the truth of 'As of June 30, 2003, Christine Marie Evert had won the French Open a record seven times' is confirmed by historical sports records, making it true. Practicing this kind of analysis can enhance problem-solving abilities in mathematics and beyond.
Logical Analysis
Logical analysis is the process of evaluating and interpreting statements to determine their truth value. This involves scrutinizing the structure and content of statements, assessing their validity, and deducing conclusions. In our exercise, considering the sentence '\(x+3\) is a positive integer' requires logical analysis. It varies based on the value of \(x\), indicating that without specific numerical value for \(x\), we cannot assign a truth value.
Logical analysis extends into understanding hypothetical statements such as 'If Jennifer is late for the party, then her cousin Zachary will be quite angry.' It demands assessing "if...then" scenarios, factors that modify their truth, and consequences of hypothetical situations. This analysis helps in developing mathematical reasoning and critical thinking skills, which are highly applicable in various domains, particularly in computer science and philosophy.
Mathematical Proofs
Mathematical proofs comprise a sequence of logical steps taken to demonstrate the truth of a statement. While the exercise doesn't directly ask for proofs, it provides a great context for appreciating their purpose. For instance, determining that 'Fifteen is an even number' is false isn't enough. To "prove" it, one might show how division by two fails to leave no remainder. Mathematical proofs are the cornerstone of establishing valid conclusions and overarching principles in math.
Understanding the distinction between proof and statement evaluation is important. Statements, with a clear truth value, rely on the context, while proofs employ deductive reasoning to establish those truths under given conditions. This systematic approach builds upon fundamental principles to deliver precise and reliable conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

25\. Let the universe for the variables in the following statements consist of all real numbers. In each case negate and simplify the given statement. a) \(\forall x \forall y[(x>y) \rightarrow(x-y>0)]\) b) \(\forall x \forall y[(x

16\. Prove that for every integer \(n, n^{2}\) is even if and only if \(n\) is even.

24\. Let \(n\) be an integer. Prove that \(n\) is even if and only if \(31 n+12\) is even.

4\. Let \(n\) be a positive integer greater than 1 . We call \(n\) prime if the only positive integers that (exactly) divide \(n\) are 1 and \(n\) itself. For example, the first seven primes are \(2,3,5,7,11\), 13 , and 17. (We shall learn more about primes in Chapter 4.) Use the method of exhaustion to show that every integer in the universe \(4,6,8, \ldots, 36,38\) can be written as the sum of two primes.

5\. Consider each of the following arguments. If the argument is valid, identify the rule of inference that establishes its validity. If not, indicate whether the error is due to an attempt to argue by the converse or by the inverse. a) Andrea can program in \(C++\), and she can program in Java. Therefore Andrea can program in \(\mathrm{C}++\). b) A sufficient condition for Bubbles to win the golf tournament is that her opponent Meg not sink a birdie on the last hole. Bubbles won the golf tournament. Therefore Bubbles' opponent Meg did not sink a birdic on the last hole. c) If Ron's computer program is correct, then he'll be able to complete his computer science assignment in at most two hours. It takes Ron over two hours to complete his computer science assignment. Therefore Ron's computer program is not correct. d) Eileen's car keys are in her purse, or they are on the kitchen table. Eileen's car keys are not on the kitchen table. Therefore Eileen's car keys are in her purse. e) If interest rates fall, then the stock market will rise. Interest rates are not falling. Therefore the stock market will not rise.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.