/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 The viscosity of a liquid deterg... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The viscosity of a liquid detergent is supposed to average 800 centistokes at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C} . \mathrm{A}\) random sample of 16 batches of detergent is collected, and the average viscosity is \(812 .\) Suppose we know that the standard deviation of viscosity is \(\sigma=25\) centistokes. (a) State the hypotheses that should be tested. (b) Test these hypotheses using \(\alpha=0.05\). What are your conclusions? (c) What is the \(P\)-value for the test? (d) Find a 95 percent confidence interval on the mean.

Short Answer

Expert verified
We do not reject the null hypothesis; the mean viscosity is between 799.75 and 824.25 centistokes.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is that the average viscosity of the detergent is 800 centistokes, i.e., \(\mu = 800\). The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) is that the average viscosity is different from 800 centistokes, i.e., \(\mu eq 800\).
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

Since the standard deviation is known and the sample size is 16, we use the z-test. The test statistic is given by:\[ z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}} \]Given that \(\bar{x} = 812\), \(\mu_0 = 800\), \(\sigma = 25\), and \(n = 16\), the test statistic is:\[ z = \frac{812 - 800}{\frac{25}{\sqrt{16}}} = \frac{12}{6.25} = 1.92 \]
03

Compare With Critical Value

For a two-tailed test with \(\alpha = 0.05\), the critical z-values are \(\pm 1.96\). Since \(z = 1.92\) is within the range \(-1.96 < z < 1.96\), we fail to reject the null hypothesis \(H_0\).
04

Determine the P-value

The P-value can be found by looking up the cumulative probability corresponding to \(z = 1.92\) in the standard normal distribution table. The P-value is approximately 0.054.Since the P-value (0.054) is greater than \(\alpha = 0.05\), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
05

Calculate Confidence Interval

The 95% confidence interval for the mean is given by:\[\bar{x} \pm z_{critical} \times \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}\]Substituting \(\bar{x} = 812\), \(z_{critical} = 1.96\), \(\sigma = 25\), and \(n = 16\), the interval is:\[812 \pm 1.96 \times \frac{25}{4} = 812 \pm 12.25\]Therefore, the confidence interval is \([799.75, 824.25]\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

z-test
The z-test is a statistical test used when the standard deviation of the population is known, and the sample size is sufficiently large. In this scenario, we have a detergent whose viscosity we want to test against a known average. Let's simplify this.

To decide whether the average viscosity of the detergent is 800 centistokes, we set up a statistical test. We perform the z-test using the formula:
  • \[ z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}} \]
Here:
  • \( \bar{x} \) is the sample mean (812 in this case)
  • \( \mu_0 \) is the hypothesized population mean (800)
  • \( \sigma \) is the population standard deviation (25)
  • \( n \) is the sample size (16)
The calculated z-value is 1.92, which indicates how far the sample mean is from the population mean in terms of standard error units.

We compare the calculated z-value with the critical values (for a two-tailed test with \( \alpha = 0.05 \)), which are \( \pm 1.96 \). The calculated z-value (1.92) does not fall outside this range, leading us to conclude that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
confidence interval
Confidence intervals provide a range of values that likely contain the true population mean. They give insights into the precision of our mean estimate from the sample data.

To calculate a 95% confidence interval for the population mean, we use the formula:
  • \[ \bar{x} \pm z_{critical} \times \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} \]
Let's break it down:
  • \( \bar{x} \) is the sample mean (812)
  • \( z_{critical} \) is the critical value for 95% confidence, typically 1.96 for a normal distribution
  • \( \sigma \) is the population standard deviation (25)
  • \( n \) is the sample size (16)
Plugging these values into the formula gives us a range from 799.75 to 824.25. This means we are 95% confident that the true mean viscosity of the detergent lies within this interval.

This interval supports the hypothesis test's results because the hypothesized mean of 800 centistokes is within this confidence range, suggesting it is plausible.
P-value
The P-value represents the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the observed results, under the null hypothesis.

In the context of the hypothesis test, the P-value helps us decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. It is found by calculating how likely the observed z-value (1.92) would be, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

From the standard normal distribution table, a z-value of 1.92 has a corresponding P-value of about 0.054. Because this P-value is greater than our chosen significance level \( \alpha = 0.05 \), it suggests our sample data is not sufficiently extreme to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, with a P-value of 0.054, there is a 5.4% chance of observing such an extreme value if the null hypothesis were indeed true. This means the result doesn't provide strong enough evidence to discard the null. It highlights the role of P-values in making informed decisions about statistical hypotheses.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The time to repair an electronic instrument is a normally distributed random variable measured in hours. The repair times for 16 such instruments chosen at random are as follows: $$ \begin{array}{lccc} \hline \multicolumn{4}{c}{\text { Hours }} \\ \hline 159 & 280 & 101 & 212 \\ 224 & 379 & 179 & 264 \\ 222 & 362 & 168 & 250 \\ 149 & 260 & 485 & 170 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) You wish to know if the mean repair time exceeds 225 hours. Set up appropriate hypotheses for investigating this issue. (b) Test the hypotheses you formulated in part (a). What are your conclusions? Use \(\alpha=0.05\) (c) Find the \(P\)-value for the test. (d) Construct a 95 percent confidence interval on mean repair time.

A new filtering device is installed in a chemical unit. Before its installation, a random sample yielded the following information about the percentage of impurity: \(\bar{y}_{1}=12.5\), \(S_{1}^{2}=101.17\), and \(n_{1}=8\). Afler installation, a random sample yielded \(\bar{y}_{2}=10.2\). \(S_{2}^{2}=94.73, n_{2}=9\) (a) Can you conclude that the two variances are equal? Use \(\alpha=0.05\). (b) Has the filtering device reduced the percentage of impurity significantly? Use \(\alpha=0.05\)

An article in the Journal of Strain Analysis (vol. 18, no. 2,1983\()\) compares several procedures for predicting the shear strength for steel plate girders. Data for nine girders in the form of the ratio of predicted to observed load for two of these procedures, the Karlsruhe and Lehigh methods, are as follows: \begin{tabular}{lcc} \hline Girder & Karlsruhe Method & Lehigh Method \\ \hline \(\mathrm{S} 1 / 1\) & \(1.186\) & \(1.061\) \\ \(\mathrm{~S} 2 / 1\) & \(1.151\) & \(0.992\) \\ \(\mathrm{~S} 3 / 1\) & \(1.322\) & \(1.063\) \\ \(\mathrm{~S} 4 / 1\) & \(1.339\) & \(1.062\) \\ \(\mathrm{~S} 5 / 1\) & \(1.200\) & \(1.065\) \\ \(S 2 / 1\) & \(1.402\) & \(1.178\) \\ \(\mathrm{~S} 2 / 2\) & \(1.365\) & \(1.037\) \\ \(\$ 2 / 3\) & \(1.537\) & \(1.086\) \\ \(\mathrm{S2} / 4\) & \(1.559\) & \(1.052\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} (a) Is there any evidence to support a claim that there is a difference in mean performance between the two methods? Use \(\alpha=0.05\) (b) What is the \(P\)-value for the test in part (a)? (c) Construct a 95 percent confidence interval for the difference in mean predicted to observed load. (d) Investigate the normality assumption for both samples. (e) Investigate the normality assumption for the difference in ratios for the two methods. (f) Discuss the role of the normality assumption in the paired t-test.

The following are the buming times of chemical flares of two different formulations. The design engineers are interested in both the mean and variance of the burning times. \begin{array}{lllr} \hline \multicolumn{2}{l}{\text { Type 1 }} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\text { Type 2 }} \\ \hline 65 & 82 & 64 & 56 \\ (a) Test the hypothesis that the two variances are equal. Use \(\alpha=0.05\). (b) Using the results of (a), test the hypothesis that the mean burning times are equal. Use \(\alpha=0.05\). What is the \(P\)-value for this test? (c) Discuss the role of the normality assumption in this problem. Check the assumption of normality for both types of flares. 81 & 67 & 71 & 69 \\ 57 & 59 & 83 & 74 \\ 66 & 75 & 59 & 82 \\ 82 & 70 & 65 & 79 \\ \hline \end{array}

Two types of plastic are suitable for use by an electronic calculator manufacturer. The breaking strength of this plastic is important. It is known that \(\sigma_{1}=\sigma_{2}=1.0 \mathrm{psi}\). From random samples of \(n_{1}=10\) and \(n_{2}=12\) we obtain \(\bar{y}_{1}=162.5\) and \(\bar{y}_{2}=155.0 .\) The company will not adopt plastic 1 unless its breaking strength exceeds that of plastic 2 by at least 10 psi. Based on the sample information, should they use plastic \(1 ?\) In answering this question, set up and test appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=0.01\). Construct a 99 percent confidence interval on the true mean difference in breaking strength.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.