/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 Decision Trees Young screenwrite... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Decision Trees Young screenwriter Carl Draper has just finished his first script. It has action, drama, and humor, and he thinks it will be a blockbuster. He takes the script to every motion picture studio in town and tries to sell it but to no avail. Finally, ACME studios offers to buy the script for either (a) \(\$ 12,000\) or (b) 1 percent of the movie's profits. There are two decisions the studio will have to make. First is to decide if the script is good or bad, and second if the movie is good or bad. First, there is a 90 percent chance that the script is bad. If it is bad, the studio does nothing more and throws the script out. If the script is good, they will shoot the movie. After the movie is shot, the studio will review it, and there is a 70 percent chance that the movie is bad. If the movie is bad, the movie will not be promoted and will not turn a profit. If the movie is good, the studio will promote heavily; the average profit for this type of movie is \(\$ 20\) million. Carl rejects the \(\$ 12,000\) and says he wants the 1 percent of profits. Was this a good decision by Carl?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The total expected value for Carl if he chooses 1% of the movie's profits is \(\$6,000\), which is less than the \(\$12,000\) offer from ACME Studios. Therefore, Carl's decision to reject the \(\$12,000\) and choose the 1% of profits was not a good decision.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the expected value if the script is bad

If the script is bad, there is a 90% chance that the studio will do nothing and throw the script out. This means Carl will earn no money. So, the expected value for Carl in this case is: \(0.9 \times \$0 = \$0\).
02

Calculate the expected value if the script is good and the movie is bad

If the script is good (10% chance) and the movie turns out bad (70% chance), then there is a 7% chance (0.1 x 0.7) the movie will not turn a profit. In this case, Carl's earnings will also be $0. So, the expected value for Carl in this case is: \(0.07 \times \$0 = \$0\).
03

Calculate the expected value if the script is good and the movie is good

If the script is good (10% chance) and the movie turns out good (30% chance), then there is a 3% chance (0.1 x 0.3) the movie will be promoted heavily and have an average profit of $20 million. As Carl has chosen 1% of profits, he will earn: \(\$20,\!000,\!000 \times 0.01 = \$200,\!000\). The expected value for Carl in this case is: \(0.03 \times \$200,\!000 = \$6,\!000\).
04

Calculate the total expected value for Carl

Now we can sum up the expected values from the three scenarios mentioned above: Total Expected Value = \((Expected Value: Script Bad) + (Expected Value: Script Good, Movie Bad) + (Expected Value: Script Good, Movie Good)\) Total Expected Value = \(\$0 + \$0 + \$6,000 = \$6,000\)
05

Compare the expected value with the flat payment offer

Finally, we can compare the calculated total expected value with the offer of \(\$12,000\): - Expected Value of choosing 1% of profits: \(\$6,000\) - ACME Studios' offer: \(\$12,000\) Since the expected value of 1% of profits is less than the \(\$12,000\) offer, we can conclude that Carl's decision to reject the \(\$12,000\) for 1% of profits was not a good decision.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Expected Value
Understanding expected value is crucial in decision-making processes, especially in financial and risk-based evaluations. In simple terms, the expected value helps to determine the average outcome of a probability scenario.
It is calculated by multiplying each possible outcome by the likelihood of it occurring, and then adding all those values together.
  • If an event can have multiple outcomes with different probabilities, the expected value provides a single number representing the overall average.
  • This value is useful because it can compare different choices to find the one with the best average long-term results.
The concept is particularly relevant in Carl Draper's case. Carl faced a decision involving two offers from ACME studios: a certain $12,000 or 1% of potential movie profits. By calculating the expected value of potential movie profits, Carl could investigate if his decision was financially sound. Unfortunately, the expected value of his profit share amounted to $6,000, which was lower than the sure $12,000 offer.
This mathematical insight, via expected value, highlights that choosing the immediate payment would have been wiser in this instance.
Probability Analysis
Probability analysis involves evaluating the likelihoods of various outcomes and using them to forecast results. This analysis is essential when faced with uncertain situations. Each component of an event is given a probability that signifies how likely it is to occur, typically expressed as a percentage or a fraction.
In Carl's scenario, several probabilities were involved:
  • A 90% chance that the script is bad, resulting in no profit.
  • A 10% chance that the script is good.
  • If good, a 70% chance the movie is bad, and a 30% chance the movie is good and profitable.
Analyzing these probabilities allows decision-makers to understand and prepare for the potential outcomes. It gives a numerical perspective to what might otherwise be gut-feeling decisions.
Probability analysis, in Carl's decision, revealed that the chance of earning significant profits was relatively low. This analytical process thus supported the conclusion that taking the fixed offer might have been the safer bet.
Risk Assessment
Risk assessment is the method used to identify and evaluate the financial risks involved in a particular decision. For Carl Draper, choosing the 1% profit option involved a deep understanding of potential hazards.
Risk assessment examines both positive and negative results:
  • The high risk meant there was only a slim chance (3%) that he would gain substantial profit.
  • A great risk assessment also considers the impact of negative scenarios, such as earning nothing if the movie fails.
This assessment demonstrated that while the reward could be high ($200,000 potential), the likelihood was low, and the downside was substantial compared to the guaranteed $12,000. Understanding this risk reassessment over two potential earnings shed light on why Carl's decision was risky. From an objective risk standpoint, minimizing downside potential would have likely suggested taking the upfront payment.
Decision Making
Decision making, especially in business and finance, is the process of choosing the best course of action among multiple alternatives. This requires evaluating expected value, probability, and risk.
  • Decision-makers must consider not only the potential benefits but also the probabilities and risks of each outcome.
  • Another essential part is comparison, where each option is weighed against others in terms of potential gain and likelihood.
  • Creating a decision tree can help visualize these options and see at a glance which might offer the best trade-off of risk and reward.
In Carl's scenario, he had to choose between a safe $12,000 and the uncertainty of a profit share. Despite the allure of greater earnings, a thorough decision-making process based on expected value and probability analysis showed the fixed offer was more rational. Decision making in such contexts necessitates foregoing potential to secure a guarantee, indicative of risk aversion practices common among seasoned investors and business professionals.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sensitivity Analysis and Break-Even Point We are evaluating a project that costs \(\$ 724,000\), has an eight-year life, and has no salvage value. Assume that depreciation is straightline to zero over the life of the project. Sales are projected at 75,000 units per year. Price per unit is \(\$ 39\), variable cost per unit is \(\$ 23\), and fixed costs are \(\$ 850,000\) per year. The tax rate is 35 percent, and we require a 15 percent return on this project. 1\. Calculate the accounting break-even point. 2\. Calculate the base-case cash flow and NPV. What is the sensitivity of NPV to changes in the sales figure? Explain what your answer tells you about a 500-unit decrease in projected sales. 3\. What is the sensitivity of OCF to changes in the variable cost figure? Explain what your answer tells you about a \(\$ 1\) decrease in estimated variable costs.

Scenario Analysis Consider a project to supply Detroit with 55,000 tons of machine screws annually for automobile production. You will need an initial \(\$ 1,700,000\) investment in threading equipment to get the project started; the project will last for five years. The accounting department estimates that annual fixed costs will be \(\$ 520,000\) and that variable costs should be \(\$ 220\) per ton; accounting will depreciate the initial fixed asset investment straight-line to zero over the five-year project life. It also estimates a salvage value of \(\$ 300,000\) after dismantling costs. The marketing department estimates that the automakers will let the contract at a selling price of \(\$ \mathbf{2 4 5}\) per ton. The engineering department estimates you will need an initial net working capital investment of \(\$ 600,000\). You require a 13 percent return and face a marginal tax rate of 38 percent on this project. 1\. What is the estimated OCF for this project? The NPV? Should you pursue this project? 2\. Suppose you believe that the accounting department's initial cost and salvage value projections are accurate only to within \pm 15 percent; the marketing department's price estimate is accurate only to within \pm 10 percent; and the engineering department's net working capital estimate is accurate only to within \pm 5 percent. What is your worst-case scenario for this project? Your best-case scenario? Do you still want to pursue the project?

Financial Breakeven Niko has purchased a brand new machine to produce its High Flight line of shoes. The machine has an economic life of five years. The depreciation schedule for the machine is straight-line with no salvage value. The machine costs \(\$ 390,000\). The sales price per pair of shoes is \(\$ 60\), while the variable cost is \(\$ 14\). \(\$ 185,000\) of fixed costs per year are attributed to the machine. Assume that the corporate tax rate is 34 percent and the appropriate discount rate is 8 percent. What is the financial break- even point? INTERMEDIATE (Questions 11-25)

Financial Break-Even Analysis You are considering investing in a company that cultivates abalone for sale to local restaurants. Use the following information: The discount rate for the company is 15 percent, the initial investment in equipment is \(\$ 360,000\), and the project's economic life is seven years. Assume the equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the project's life. 1\. What is the accounting break-even level for the project? 2\. What is the financial break-even level for the project?

Project Analysis You are considering a new product launch. The project will cost \(\mathbf{\$ 9 6 0 , 0 0 0}\), have a four-year life, and have no salvage value; depreciation is straight-line to zero. Sales are projected at 240 units per year; price per unit will be \(\$ 25,000\); variable cost per unit will be \(\$ 19,500\); and fixed costs will be \(\$ 830,000\) per year. The required return on the project is 15 percent, and the relevant tax rate is 35 percent. 1\. Based on your experience, you think the unit sales, variable cost, and fixed cost projections given here are probably accurate to within \pm 10 percent. What are the upper and lower bounds for these projections? What is the base-case NPV? What are the best-case and worst-case scenarios? 2\. Evaluate the sensitivity of your base-case NPV to changes in fixed costs. 3\. What is the accounting break-even level of output for this project?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.