/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 33 Replacement Decisions Suppose we... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Replacement Decisions Suppose we are thinking about replacing an old computer with a new one. The old one cost us \(\$ 650,000\); the new one will cost \(\$ 780,000\). The new machine will be depreciated straight-line to zero over its five-year life. It will probably be worth about \(\$ 140,000\) after five years. The old computer is being depreciated at a rate of \(\$ 130,000\) per year. It will be completely written off in three years. If we don't replace it now, we will have to replace it in two years. We can sell it now for \(\$ 230,000\); in two years it will probably be worth \(\$ 90,000\). The new machine will save us \(\$ 125,000\) per year in operating costs. The tax rate is 38 percent, and the discount rate is 14 percent. 1\. Suppose we recognize that if we don't replace the computer now, we will be replacing it in two years. Should we replace now or should we wait? (Hint: What we effectively have here is a decision either to "invest" in the old computer-by not selling it-or to invest in the new one. Notice that the two investments have unequal lives.) 2\. Suppose we consider only whether we should replace the old computer now without worrying about what's going to happen in two years. What are the relevant cash flows? Should we replace it or not? (Hint: Consider the net change in the firm's aftertax cash flows if we do the replacement.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In both cases, considering replacing the old computer in two years or not considering the future, the net change in after-tax cash flows is less than the difference in investments between the old computer and the new one. Therefore, we should not replace the computer now.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate annual depreciation of the new machine

The new machine will be depreciated straight-line to zero over its five-year life. So, annual depreciation of the new machine will be: \(Depreciation = \frac{780000 - 140000}{5} = \$128,000\)
02

Calculate after tax cash flows for both old and new computers

We will calculate the cash flows for both the old and new computers for the first two years. After tax cash flow = (Cost Savings + Depreciation) x (1 - tax rate) + tax rate x Depreciation Old Computer cash flow: Year 1: \((0 + 130000) x (1 - 0.38) + 0.38 x 130000 = \$80,600\) Year 2: \((0 + 130000) x (1 - 0.38) + 0.38 x 130000 = \$80,600\) New Computer cash flow: Year 1: \((125000 + 128000) x (1 - 0.38) + 0.38 x 128000 = \$156,740\) Year 2: \((125000 + 128000) x (1 - 0.38) + 0.38 x 128000 = \$156,740\)
03

Calculate the net present value of the differences in cash flows

Now we will calculate the net present value of the difference in cash flows over the first two years. Difference in cash flows: Year 1: \(\$156,740 - \$80,600 = \$76,140\) Year 2: \(\$156,740 - \$80,600 = \$76,140\) Net Present Value (\(NPV = \frac{CF_1}{(1+r)^1} + \frac{CF_2}{(1+r)^2}\)): \(NPV = \frac{76140}{(1+0.14)^1} + \frac{76140}{(1+0.14)^2} \approx \$56,731 + \$49,608.77 = \$106,339.77\)
04

Compare the NPV with the initial investment and decide to replace or not

Now we will compare the NPV of the difference in cash flows to the difference in initial investments between the old computer and new one. Cost of keeping old computer: \(\$650,000 - \$230,000 = \$420,000\) Cost of buying new computer: \(\$780,000\) Difference in investments: \(\$780,000 - \$420,000 = \$360,000\) Since the NPV of the difference in cash flows (\$106,339.77) is less than the difference in investments (\$360,000), we should not replace the computer now. #Part 2: Considering only present situation and not worrying about the future#
05

Calculate the net change in after-tax cash flows

We already have calculated after-tax cash flows for old and new computers in the previous part. Let's calculate the net change in after-tax cash flows for the first year: Net change in after-tax cash flows = New computer cash flow (Year 1) - Old computer cash flow (Year 1) \(\$156,740 - \$80,600 = \$76,140\)
06

Check if net change in after-tax cash flows is greater than the difference in investments

If the net change in after-tax cash flows is greater than the difference in investments, we should replace the computer. Difference in investments: \(\$780,000 - \$420,000 = \$360,000\) Since the net change in after-tax cash flows (\$76,140) is less than the difference in investments (\$360,000), we should not replace the computer now even considering only the present situation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Net Present Value
The net present value (NPV) is a core concept in capital budgeting. It evaluates the profitability of an investment by calculating the present values of expected future cash flows. To determine the NPV, subtract the initial investment from the sum of discounted cash flows. The formula used is: \[ NPV = \sum \frac{CF_t}{(1 + r)^t} - Initial\, Investment \] where \( CF_t \) refers to the cash flows in period \( t \), and \( r \) is the discount rate.
In the context of replacement decisions, calculating NPV helps us understand whether replacing equipment now will yield a higher return than sticking with the old one. A positive NPV indicates a profitable investment.
In our exercise, net cash flows from both computers were compared, and their NPVs helped guide the replacement decision by pinpointing whether the new machine's added value justifies its cost.
Replacement Decision
A replacement decision involves determining whether to substitute an existing asset with a new one. This type of decision can be complex due to differing asset lives, costs, and benefits. Key factors to consider include:
  • The cost of acquiring a new asset versus maintaining the old one.
  • The economic benefits provided by each option, like cost savings from the new machine.
  • The residual value of old and new assets, as outlined by potential resale or scrap value.

In our case, the old computer still had some residual value and ongoing depreciation benefits. However, the potential cost savings from the new machine were taken into account to reach a sensible decision based on the analysis.
Cash Flow Analysis
Cash flow analysis breaks down the cash inflows and outflows associated with investment decisions, focusing on understanding the net cash impact of potential replacement. A few steps are involved:
  • Calculate expected cash inflows and outflows for both the new and old assets.
  • Account for differences in depreciation, operating costs, and tax impacts.
  • Determine net cash flow differences to assess financial impact.

This analysis is essential because it puts all costs and benefits into present terms, allowing for more informed decision-making. In the exercise, the old and new computers' cash flows were calculated using the formula for after-tax cash flow, showing the benefits of replacing over retaining the old computer.
Depreciation
Depreciation refers to the systematic allocation of an asset's cost over its useful life. It reduces taxable income, providing a tax shield that effectively increases cash flow. There are various methods to calculate depreciation, but the straight-line method is commonly used for simplicity.

In our exercise, the new computer was depreciated using straight-line depreciation. This method involves equal annual depreciation expenses over the asset's five-year life span. Calculating these expenses helps in understanding the ongoing reductions in taxable income.
  • It influences the cash flow, thus playing a major role in financial evaluations like our replacement exercise.
  • The old computer's depreciation was continued from its existing schedule, affecting the decision process based on its comparatively larger rate than the new asset.
Investment Appraisal
Investment appraisal assesses whether it's worth investing in a new asset or keeping the existing one. It relies heavily on concepts like NPV, cash flow analysis, and the comparison of costs and benefits. The process includes:
  • Evaluating the economic life and ongoing costs of old versus new assets.
  • Factoring in savings, tax implications, and opportunity costs from different depreciation and residual value estimates.
  • Analyzing quantitative data, but also considering qualitative aspects like strategic fit and operational benefits.

In our scenario, investment appraisal helped determine that despite potential savings from the new machine, the assessed net present value and cash flow differences were insufficient. Thus, the new investment wasn't justified on purely financial grounds, a decision supported by thorough appraisal of the available information.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Calculating Project NPV Down Under Boomerang, Inc., is considering a new three-year expansion project that requires an initial fixed asset investment of \(\$ 2.4\) million. The fixed asset will be depreciated straight-line to zero over its three-year tax life, after which it will be worthless. The project is estimated to generate \(\$ 2,050,000\) in annual sales, with costs of \(\$ 950,000\). The tax rate is 35 percent and the required return is 12 percent. What is the project's NPV?

Calculating NPV Howell Petroleum is considering a new project that complements its existing business. The machine required for the project costs \(\$ 1.8\) million. The marketing department predicts that sales related to the project will be \(\$ 1.1\) million per year for the next four years, after which the market will cease to exist. The machine will be depreciated down to zero over its fouryear economic life using the straight-line method. Cost of goods sold and operating expenses related to the project are predicted to be 25 percent of sales. Howell also needs to add net working capital of \(\$ 150,000\) immediately. The additional net working capital will be recovered in full at the end of the project's life. The corporate tax rate is 35 percent. The required rate of return for Howell is 16 percent. Should Howell proceed with the project?

Project Evaluation Dog Up! Franks is looking at a new sausage system with an installed cost of \(\$ 420,000\). This cost will be depreciated straight-line to zero over the project's five-year life, at the end of which the sausage system can be scrapped for \(\$ 60,000\). The sausage system will save the firm \(\$ 135,000\) per year in pretax operating costs, and the system requires an initial investment in net working capital of \(\$ 28,000\). If the tax rate is 34 percent and the discount rate is 10 percent, what is the NPV of this project?

Calculating Project NPV J. Smythe, Inc., manufactures fine furniture. The company is deciding whether to introduce a new mahogany dining room table set. The set will sell for \(\$ 5,600\), including a set of eight chairs. The company feels that sales will be 1,800, 1,950, 2,500, 2,350, and 2,100 sets per year for the next five years, respectively. Variable costs will amount to 45 percent of sales, and fixed costs are \(\$ 1.9\) million per year. The new tables will require inventory amounting to 10 percent of sales, produced and stockpiled in the year prior to sales. It is believed that the addition of the new table will cause a loss of 250 tables per year of the oak tables the company produces. These tables sell for \(\$ 4,500\) and have variable costs of 40 percent of sales. The inventory for this oak table is also 10 percent of sales. J. Smythe currently has excess production capacity. If the company buys the necessary equipment today, it will cost \(\$ 16\) million. However, the excess production capacity means the company can produce the new table without buying the new equipment. The company controller has said that the current excess capacity will end in two years with current production. This means that if the company uses the current excess capacity for the new table, it will be forced to spend the \(\$ 16\) million in two years to accommodate the increased sales of its current products. In five years, the new equipment will have a market value of \(\$ 3.1\) million if purchased today, and \(\$ 7.4\) million if purchased in two years. The equipment is depreciated on a seven-year MACRS schedule. The company has a tax rate of 40 percent, and the required return for the project is 14 percent. 1\. Should J. Smythe undertake the new project? 2\. Can you perform an IRR analysis on this project? How many IRRs would you expect to find? 3\. How would you interpret the profitability index?

Inflation and Company Value Sparkling Water, Inc., expects to sell 2.1 million bottles of drinking water each year in perpetuity. This year each bottle will sell for \(\$ 1.25\) in real terms and will cost \(\$ .75\) in real terms. Sales income and costs occur at year-end. Revenues will rise at a real rate of 6 percent annually, while real costs will rise at a real rate of 5 percent annually. The real discount rate is 10 percent. The corporate tax rate is 34 percent. What is Sparkling worth today?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.