/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Translate the given exponential ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Translate the given exponential statement into an equivalent logarithmic statement. $$e^{3.25}=25.79$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Convert the exponential equation \(e^{3.25} = 25.79\) into a logarithmic equation. Answer: The equivalent logarithmic equation for the given exponential equation is \(\ln{25.79} = 3.25\).

Step by step solution

01

Identify the exponential equation

The given exponential equation is: $$e^{3.25} = 25.79$$
02

Rearrange as a logarithmic equation

We can rearrange the equation as a logarithmic equation with the base e (natural logarithm, written as \(\ln\)). The general form of a logarithmic equation is: $$\log_{a}{b} = x$$ In our case, \(a\) is the base (e), \(b\) is the result (25.79), and \(x\) is the exponent (3.25).
03

Rewrite as a logarithmic equation

Using the relationship between exponential and logarithmic equations, we can rewrite the given equation as: $$\ln{25.79} = 3.25$$ This is the equivalent logarithmic statement for the given exponential statement: \(e^{3.25} = 25.79\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Natural Logarithm
The natural logarithm is a special type of logarithm that has the mathematical constant e (approximately 2.71828) as its base. It's written as \(\ln(x)\) and is the inverse function of the exponential function \(e^x\). In simpler terms, the natural logarithm of a number answers the question: 'To what power must e be raised, to get this number?’

For example, if we have the equation \(e^y = x\), then the natural logarithm of \(x\) is \(y\), expressed as \(\ln(x) = y\). This relationship is crucial because it allows us to solve exponential equations involving e by transforming them into logarithmic equations, which are often easier to work with.
Exponential Equations
Exponential equations feature variables in the exponent and can often be recognized by their base raised to a power, like \(a^x = b\). These equations can describe phenomena that exhibit exponential growth or decay, such as population growth, radioactive decay, or compound interest.

One way to solve these equations is to use logarithms. The base of the logarithm used to solve the equation typically matches the base of the exponent. For bases other than e, this means using the logarithm function \(\log_b(x)\), but for the natural base e, the natural logarithm \(\ln(x)\) is more appropriate. Harnessing the power of logarithms allows us to 'bring down' the exponent, making it possible to solve for the variable.
Logarithmic Equations
Logarithmic equations contain logarithms and usually present a relationship where the logarithm of a number is set equal to a value. The structure of such an equation is \(\log_a(b) = c\), where \(a\) is the base of the logarithm, \(b\) is the argument, and \(c\) is the value the logarithm equals to.

When solving logarithmic equations, the goal is to isolate the logarithm on one side and convert it to its equivalent exponential form to solve for the argument. It's crucial to remember that a logarithm basically asks the question, 'To what power must the base be raised to produce this argument?' This conceptual understanding can significantly aid in the transformation and solution of logarithmic equations.
Logarithmic Form
The logarithmic form of an expression converts an exponential equation into its logarithmic counterpart. The conversion process from exponential form \(a^x = b\) to logarithmic form is \(\log_a(b) = x\). This transformation is valuable because it enables us to solve for variables that were once exponents, which is difficult with basic algebraic tools.

As shown in the original exercise, \(e^{3.25} = 25.79\), by converting to logarithmic form we get \(\ln(25.79) = 3.25\). By understanding and applying the logarithmic form, students can navigate through problems involving exponential functions with more ease and confidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find the difference quotient of the given function. Then rationalize its numerator and simplify. $$g(x)=\sqrt{x^{2}-x}$$

This exercise provides a justification for the claim that the function \(M(x)=c(.5)^{x / h}\) gives the mass after \(x\) years of a radioactive element with half-life \(h\) years. Suppose we have \(c\) grams of an element that has a half-life of 50 years. Then after 50 years, we would have \(c\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\) grams. After another 50 years, we would have half of that, namely, \(c\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)=c\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}\) (a) How much remains after a third 50-year period? After a fourth 50 -year period? (b) How much remains after \(t 50\) -year periods? (c) If \(x\) is the number of years, then \(x / 50\) is the number of 50-year periods. By replacing the number of periods \(t\) in part (b) by \(x / 50,\) you obtain the amount remaining after \(x\) years. This gives the function \(M(x)\) when \(h=50\) The same argument works in the general case (just replace 50 by \(h\) ). Find \(M(x)\).

The table gives the death rate in motor vehicle accidents (per 100,000 population) in selected years. $$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Year } & 1970 & 1980 & 1985 & 1990 & 1995 & 2000 & 2003 \\ \hline \text { Death Rate } & 26.8 & 23.4 & 19.3 & 18.8 & 16.5 & 15.6 & 15.4 \\\ \hline \end{array}$$ (a) Find an exponential model for the data, with \(x=0\) corresponding to 1970 . (b) What was the death rate in 1998 and in \(2002 ?\) (c) Assume that the model remains accurate, when will the death rate drop to 13 per \(100,000 ?\)

A bicycle store finds that the number \(N\) of bikes sold is related to the number \(d\) of dollars spent on advertising by \(N=51+100 \cdot \ln (d / 100+2)\) (a) How many bikes will be sold if nothing is spent on advertising? If \(\$ 1000\) is spent? If \(\$ 10,000\) is spent? (b) If the average profit is \(\$ 25\) per bike, is it worthwhile to spend \(\$ 1000\) on advertising? What about \(\$ 10,000 ?\) (c) What are the answers in part (b) if the average profit per bike is \(\$ 35 ?\)

Rationalize the denominator and simplify your answer. $$\frac{3}{\sqrt{8}}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.