/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 351 Define a relation on the set of ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Define a relation on the set of all lists of \(n\) distinct integers chosen from \(\\{1,2, \ldots, n\\},\) by saying two lists are related if they have the same elements (though perhaps in a different order) in the first \(k\) places, and the same elements (though perhaps in a different order) in the last \(n-k\) places. Show this relation is an equivalence relation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The relation is an equivalence relation because it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Relation

Consider a set of all lists of length \(n\) composed of distinct integers chosen from \(\{1, 2, \ldots, n\}\). Define a relation \(R\) on this set such that two lists \(L_{1}\) and \(L_{2}\) are related (denoted as \(L_{1} R L_{2}\)) if they have the same elements in the first \(k\) places (in any order) and the same elements in the last \(n-k\) places (in any order).
02

Show Reflexivity

To show \(R\) is reflexive, take any list \(L\). It is related to itself because the elements in the first \(k\) places of \(L\) are the same as the elements in the first \(k\) places of itself, and the elements in the last \(n-k\) places are likewise the same. Therefore, \(L R L\).
03

Show Symmetry

To show \(R\) is symmetric, assume \(L_{1} R L_{2}\). This means \(L_{1}\) and \(L_{2}\) have the same elements in their first \(k\) places and their last \(n-k\) places. Since equality of sets does not depend on order, \(L_{2}\) must also have the same elements in its first \(k\) places and last \(n-k\) places as \(L_{1}\). Thus, \(L_{2} R L_{1}\).
04

Show Transitivity

To show \(R\) is transitive, assume \(L_{1} R L_{2}\) and \(L_{2} R L_{3}\). This means \(L_{1}\) and \(L_{2}\) have the same elements in their first \(k\) places and last \(n-k\) places, and \(L_{2}\) and \(L_{3}\) likewise have the same elements in these places. Hence, \(L_{1}\) and \(L_{3}\) must have the same elements in their first \(k\) places and in their last \(n-k\) places, meaning \(L_{1} R L_{3}\).
05

Conclusion

Since we have shown that \(R\) is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, \(R\) is an equivalence relation on the set of all lists of \(n\) distinct integers chosen from \(\{1, 2, \ldots, n\}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Set Theory
Set theory is a fundamental area of mathematics that deals with collections of objects, called sets. In this exercise, we work with a set of lists formed from distinct integers pulled from the set \(1, 2, \backslash ldots, n\). An important concept in set theory is how sets relate to each other.

Here, two lists are considered related if they share the same elements under certain conditions. These conditions are met when they have identical elements in the first \(k\) positions and identical elements in the last \(n-k\) positions, though the order within those segments may differ.

Understanding how these lists are classified into related groups is key to grasping the concept of equivalence relations, a crucial notion within set theory.
Reflexivity
Reflexivity is a property of a relation where every element is related to itself. To show reflexivity for our relation \(R\), we need to prove that any given list \L\ is related to itself.

Consider any list \L\. By definition, \L\ has the same elements in its first \(k\) places as itself. Similarly, it has the same elements in its last \(n-k\) places as itself. Therefore, \L \ R \ L\, proving that the relation is reflexive for every list in our set.

Reflexivity tells us self-comparison, a crucial check in validating that a relation qualifies as an equivalence relation.
Symmetry
Symmetry is another essential property of equivalence relations where if one element is related to a second, the second is related to the first. For our relation \(R\), we need to verify that if two lists \L_{1} \ and \L_{2} \ are related, then \L_{2} \ is also related to \L_{1} \.

Assume \L_{1} \ R \ L_{2} \. This means \L_{1} \ and \ L_{2} \ share identical elements in both their first \(k\) places and their last \(n-k\) places. Since the order of elements in a set does not affect their equality, \L_{2} \ must also have the same elements as \L_{1} \ in these positions. Therefore, \ L_{2} \ R \ L_{1} \.

The symmetry property is successfully shown, adding one more step in characterizing \(R\) as an equivalence relation.
Transitivity
Transitivity is the last essential property we need to establish for an equivalence relation. A relation is transitive if, whenever \L_{1} \ is related to \L_{2} \, and \L_{2} \ is related to \L_{3} \, then \ L_{1} \ is also related to \L_{3} \.

Suppose \L_{1} \ R \ L_{2} \ and \L_{2} \ R \ L_{3} \. This means \L_{1} \ and \L_{2} \ share the same elements in their first \(k\) places and last \(n-k\) places. Similarly, \L_{2} \ and \L_{3} \ share the same elements in those segments. Consequently, \ L_{1} \ and \L_{3} \ must have identical elements in their first \(k\) places and last \(n-k\) places. Thus, \L_{1} \ R \ L_{3} \.

By establishing transitivity, we complete our verification that the relation \(R\) is indeed an equivalence relation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Find the orbit and multiorbit of \(D_{4}\) acting on the coloring $$ \\{(1, R),(2, R),(3, B),(4, B)\\}, $$ or, in standard notation, \(R R B B\) of the vertices of a square. (b) How many group elements map the coloring \(R R B B\) to itself? What is the multiplicity of \(R R B B\) in its multiorbit? (c) Find the orbit and multiorbit of \(D_{4}\) acting on the coloring $$ \\{(1, R),(2, B),(3, R),(4, B)\\} $$ (d) How many elements of the group send the coloring \(R B R B\) to itself? What is the multiplicity of \(R B R B\) in its orbit?

Draw the digraph of the relation on the set \\{Sam, Mary, Pat, Ann, Polly, Sarah\\} given by "has the same first letter as."

We have red, green, and blue sticks all of the same length, with a dozen sticks of each color. We are going to make the skeleton of a cube by taking eight identical lumps of modeling clay and pushing three sticks into each lump so that the lumps become the vertices of the cube. (Clearly we won't need all the sticks!) In how many different ways could we make our cube? How many cubes have four edges of each color? How many have two red, four green, and six blue edges?

Consider the functions from \(S=\\{-2,-1,0,1,2\\}\) to \(T=\) \\{1,2,3,4,5\\} defined by \(f(x)=x+3,\) and \(g(x)=x^{5}-5 x^{3}+5 x+3\). Write down the set of ordered pairs \((x, f(x))\) for \(x \in S\) and the set of ordered pairs \((x, g(x))\) for \(x \in S\). Are the two functions the same or different?

Suppose a group \(G\) acts on a set \(S\). What is special about the subset \(\operatorname{Fix}(x)\) for an element \(x\) of \(S ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.