/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 302 If we have an unlimited supply o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

If we have an unlimited supply of identical red beads and identical blue beads, in how many ways may we string 17 of them on a necklace?

Short Answer

Expert verified
2

Step by step solution

01

- Understand the Problem

We need to find how many unique ways we can arrange 17 beads on a necklace using an unlimited supply of red and blue beads. The key here is to account for rotations and reflections, as a necklace is a circular arrangement.
02

- Calculate Number of Arrangements Without Symmetry

First, consider the number of ways to arrange 17 beads if the necklace could be straightened out into a line. Each bead can either be red or blue, so there are a total of \(2^{17}\) possible arrangements (as each position has 2 choices).
03

- Apply Burnside's Lemma for Circular Arrangements

Since a necklace is a circular arrangement, we need to account for rotations. Burnside's Lemma helps with this. This involves counting the fixed points under each possible symmetry (rotation/reflection).
04

- Fix Under Single Rotation

For each rotation, only the arrangements where all beads are the same are fixed, which gives us 2 fixed points (all red or all blue) for each of the 17 rotations.
05

- Sum Fixed Points

For 17 rotations, we have a total of 17 * 2 = 34 fixed points.
06

- Divide by Number of Rotations

Divide the sum of fixed points by the number of rotations (17). Thus, the number of unique arrangements is \(\frac{34}{17} = 2\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Burnside's Lemma
Burnside's Lemma is a powerful tool in group theory and combinatorics that helps count distinct objects under the action of a group.
In simpler terms, it accounts for symmetries, such as rotations and reflections.
For a necklace with beads, we often consider how many ways we can rotate or reflect beads while still considering the arrangement the same.
Burnside's Lemma is particularly valuable when dealing with symmetrical objects, as it simplifies the counting process.
To use it, we count how many arrangements of beads remain unchanged (or fixed) under each symmetry operation (like rotation).
We then average these counts over all possible symmetry operations to get the number of unique arrangements. Following these steps with the beads-for-necklace problem:
  • First, identify the group of symmetry operations (like rotations by various angles).
  • Then, count the fixed points (configurations unchanged) for each operation.
  • Finally, use Burnside's Lemma to calculate the average number of fixed points, which gives the distinct arrangements.
Necklace Problem
The necklace problem involves finding the number of unique ways to arrange beads on a circular string, considering rotations and sometimes reflections.
Key challenges arise because rotating the necklace makes different arrangements look the same.
For instance, rotating ABC to BCA or CAB doesn't change the pattern, so they count as one unique arrangement.
The problem becomes more complex when reflections are included, but for simplicity, the main focus is on rotations. In our specific problem:
  • We have 17 beads total, with an unlimited supply of two colors (red and blue).
  • Each bead position can be independently chosen to be red or blue, yielding a total of 2^{17} linear arrangements.
  • However, since rotations of the necklace lead to repeated patterns, we must count only unique circular arrangements. Here we apply Burnside's Lemma to simplify our work.
Combinatorial Symmetry
Combinatorial symmetry plays a crucial role in problems involving circular permutations like our necklace problem.
It deals with understanding how different configurations can be transformed into each other by certain symmetrical operations.
For instance, arrangements of beads can look identical if rotated or reflected in specific ways. Understanding these symmetries helps reduce the complexity of counting distinct sequences. In our case, we need to:
  • Recognize that the actual number of unique bead sequences is less than the total possible permutations due to symmetrical redundancy.
  • Utilize mathematics, like Burnside's Lemma, to rigorously account for symmetrical considerations.
This helps ensure accurate counting by eliminating overlapping symmetrical configurations from our total count.
Thus, combinatorial symmetry is about leveraging these properties to simplify and accurately solve counting problems in a circular context.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Here are some questions that will help you get used to the formal idea of a relation and the related formal idea of a function. \(S\) will stand for a set of size \(s\) and \(T\) will stand for a set of size \(t\). (a) What is the size of the largest relation from \(S\) to \(T ?\) (b) What is the size of the smallest relation from \(S\) to \(T ?\) (c) The relation of a function \(f: S \rightarrow T\) is the set of all ordered pairs \((x, f(x))\) with \(x \in S .\) What is the size of the relation of a function from \(S\) to \(T ?\) That is, how many ordered pairs are in the relation of a function from \(S\) to \(T ?\) (h) (d) We say \(f\) is a one-to-one function or injection from \(S\) to \(T\) if each member of \(S\) is related to a different element of \(T\). How many different elements must appear as second elements of the ordered pairs in the relation of a one-to-one function (injection) from \(S\) to \(T ?\) (e) A function \(f: S \rightarrow T\) is called an onto function or surjection if each element of \(T\) is \(f(x)\) for some \(x \in S\) What is the minimum size that \(S\) can have if there is a surjection from \(S\) to \(T ?\)

How can you compute the Orbit Enumerator of G acting on functions from \(S\) to a finite set \(T\) from the cycle index of Gacting on \(S\) ? (Use \(t\), thought of as a variable, as the picture of an element \(t\) of \(T .)\) State and prove the relevant theorem! This is Pólya's and Redfield's famous enumeration theorem.

Let \(\sigma\) and \(\varphi\) be permutations. (a) Why must \(\sigma \circ \varphi\) have an inverse? (b) Is \((\sigma \circ \varphi)^{-1}=\sigma^{-1} \varphi^{-1}\) ? (Prove or give a counter-example.) (h) (c) Is \((\sigma \circ \varphi)^{-1}=\varphi^{-1} \sigma^{-1} ?\) (Prove or give a counter-example.)

If we have five (identical) red, five (identical) blue, and five (identical) green beads, in how many ways may we string them on a necklace?

Draw the digraph of the relation from the set \\{Sam, Mary, Pat, Ann, Polly, Sarah \(\\}\) to the set \(\\{\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{M}, \mathrm{P}, \mathrm{S}\\}\) given by "has as its first letter."

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.