/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 52 Your formula for the Catalan Num... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Your formula for the Catalan Number can be expressed as a binomial coefficient divided by an integer. Whenever we have a formula that calls for division by an integer, an ideal combinatorial explanation of the formula is one that uses the quotient principle. The purpose of this problem is to find such an explanation using diagonal lattice paths. \({ }^{a}\) A diagonal lattice path that never goes below the \(y\) -coordinate of its first point is called a Dyck Path. We will call a Dyck Path from (0,0) to \((2 n, 0)\) a Catalan Path of length \(2 n\). Thus the number of Catalan Paths of length \(2 n\) is the Catalan Number \(C_{n}\) (a) If a Dyck Path has \(n\) steps (each an upstep or downstep), why do the first \(k\) steps form a Dyck Path for each nonnegative \(k \leq n ?\) (b) Thought of as a curve in the plane, a diagonal lattice path can have many local maxima and minima, and can have several absolute maxima and minima, that is, several highest points and several lowest points. What is the \(y\) -coordinate of an absolute minimum point of a Dyck Path starting at (0,0)\(?\) Explain why a Dyck Path whose rightmost absolute minimum point is its last point is a Catalan Path. (h) (c) Let \(D\) be the set of all diagonal lattice paths from (0,0) to \((2 n, 0)\). (Thus these paths can go below the \(x\) -axis.) Suppose we partition \(D\) by letting \(B_{i}\) be the set of lattice paths in \(D\) that have \(i\) upsteps (perhaps mixed with some downsteps) following the last absolute minimum. How many blocks does this partition have? Give a succinct description of the block \(B_{0} \cdot(\mathrm{h})\) (d) How many upsteps are in a Catalan Path? (e) We are going to give a bijection between the set of Catalan Paths and the block \(B_{i}\) for each \(i\) between 1 and \(n\). For now, suppose the value of \(i,\) while unknown, is fixed. We take a Catalan path and break it into three pieces. The piece \(F\) (for "front") consists of all steps before the \(i\) th upstep in the Catalan path. The piece \(U\) (for "up") consists of the \(i\) th upstep. The piece \(B\) (for "back") is the portion of the path that follows the \(i\) th upstep. Thus we can think of the path as \(F U B\). Show that the function that takes \(F U B\) to \(B U F\) is a bijection from the set of Catalan Paths onto the block \(B_{i}\) of the partition. (Notice that \(B\) UF can go below the \(x\) axis.) \((\mathrm{h})\) (f) Explain how you have just given another proof of the formula for the Catalan Numbers.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A Dyck Path with n steps never dips below the x-axis. Absolute minimum points are at y=0. Partition diagonal paths by upsteps post-minimum; B_i paths equal Catalan Paths. Catalan Paths have n upsteps, and bijection B U F \rightarrow F U B validates Catalan Numbers formula.

Step by step solution

01

- Understanding Dyck Paths

A Dyck Path is a path on a grid that starts and ends on the x-axis and does not go below it. For a Dyck Path with n steps (each step being either an upstep or downstep), the path formed by the first k steps (where k ≤ n) remains a Dyck Path because no intermediate point can go below the x-axis. Each segment preserves this property by starting and returning to or above the previous highest point.
02

- Absolute Minimum Point of Dyck Paths

In a Dyck Path that starts at (0,0), the y-coordinate of an absolute minimum point is 0 since it cannot go below the x-axis. If a Dyck Path's last point at coordinates (2n, 0) is the rightmost absolute minimum, it means the path exactly fits the definition of a Catalan Path, which is characterized by having all steps contained within the first and last points, mimicking the property that it never goes below the x-axis.
03

- Partitioning all Diagonal Lattice Paths

Let D be the set of all diagonal lattice paths from (0,0) to (2n,0), including paths that can dip below the x-axis. By partitioning these paths based on the number of upsteps after the last absolute minimum, each subset B_i (for i=0 to n) represents paths with exactly i upsteps after the last absolute minimum. Therefore, there are n + 1 blocks in this partitioning.
04

- Description of Block B_0

The block B_0 consists of paths that have their last absolute minimum right at the end of the path, at (2n,0). This means all points beyond this minimum must be downsteps. Hence, B_0 paths will have all upsteps before a series of downsteps leading to the endpoint.
05

- Counting Upsteps in a Catalan Path

A Catalan Path has exactly n upsteps because it consists of 2n steps overall, half of which are upsteps and the other half are downsteps to ensure that the path returns to the x-axis.
06

- Bijection Between Catalan Paths and Blocks B_i

Consider a Catalan Path segmented into F (front steps before the i-th upstep), U (the i-th upstep), and B (steps after the i-th upstep). By rearranging these segments as B U F, we create a path belonging to the block B_i. This transformation is a bijection because every unique Catalan Path uniquely maps to a path within the defined block, and anytime a block path is taken, it can be reordered to form a valid Catalan Path, confirming the bijection.
07

- Proof of Catalan Numbers Formula

The bijection shown establishes a one-to-one correspondence between Catalan Paths and partition blocks B_i, for i between 1 to n. This confirms that the count of Catalan Paths corresponds directly to the combinatorial arrangement given by the Catalan Numbers, reinforcing the formula C_n for Catalan Numbers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Dyck Paths
Understanding Dyck Paths is essential for grasping the concept of Catalan Numbers. A Dyck Path is a sequence of steps on a grid that starts and ends on the x-axis (usually at (0, 0) and (2n, 0)) and never falls below the x-axis. Each step in this path is either an 'upstep' (an upward move) or a 'downstep' (a downward move). The structure of Dyck Paths ensures that at no point does the path go below its starting point on the x-axis.
A key property of Dyck Paths is that any initial segment of the path (consisting of the first k steps where k ≤ n) is also a Dyck Path. This is because the path's construction inherently avoids dropping below the x-axis, no matter how many or few steps are taken.
These specific paths can represent various combinatorial structures, making them highly valuable in solving complex enumeration problems.
Lattice Paths
Lattice paths are sequences of steps that follow a structured path on a grid of points. These steps can move in different directions, like up, down, left, or right. For problems involving Catalan Numbers, diagonal lattice paths which often use upsteps and downsteps are crucial.
In the context of Catalan Numbers, we focus on lattice paths from (0,0) to (2n,0). These paths can travel above or even below the x-axis. However, for a path to be a Dyck Path or a Catalan Path, it must maintain specific properties, such as staying above the x-axis.
Understanding lattice paths helps you appreciate the versatility of these mathematical tools. They’re used to model numerous real-life and theoretical scenarios.
Combinatorial Proofs
Combinatorial proofs are a method of demonstrating the validity of a mathematical statement by using a counting argument. Rather than resorting to algebraic manipulations or calculus, combinatorial proofs show that two sets have the same number of elements by establishing a one-to-one correspondence between them.
In discussions about Catalan Numbers, combinatorial proofs can illustrate why a given formula holds true. For instance, by showing that the set of all valid paths (like Dyck Paths) can be counted in multiple, equivalent ways, one can derive important relationships and formulas.
Combinatorial proofs are impactful because they often provide deeper insight into why certain relationships exist, rather than just confirming that they do.
Bijective Functions
A bijective function, or bijection, is a pairing between elements of two sets where each element in one set corresponds to exactly one element in the other, and vice versa. In other words, every element has a unique match, and no element is left unpaired.
For example, creating a bijection between Catalan Paths and certain blocks of other paths can demonstrate the equality of their cardinalities. When solving problems involving these paths, rearranging pieces of paths (like in the bijection described with segments F, U, and B) showcases this unique correspondence.
The power of bijective functions lies in their ability to simplify complex counting problems, transforming them into more manageable parts.
Quotient Principle
The Quotient Principle is another combinatorial tool used to count objects by dividing them into distinguishable groups. When an enumeration involves a formula with a division, the Quotient Principle provides a natural explanation.
In the scenario of Catalan Numbers, this principle is used to understand why dividing the count of certain paths by an integer yields the correct number of Dyck Paths or Catalan Paths. The Quotient Principle helps partition a larger set of objects into subsets that can be counted more easily.
This method offers clarity and intuition in deriving formulas by breaking down or grouping complex structures into simpler, more understandable parts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(This becomes especially relevant in Chapter \(6,\) though it makes an important point here.) In how many ways may we attach two identical red beads and two identical blue beads to the corners of a square (with one bead per corner) free to move around in (three-dimensional) space? (n)

Assuming \(k \leq n,\) in how many ways can we pass out \(k\) distinct pieces of fruit to \(n\) children if each child may get at most one? What is the number if \(k>n\) ? Assume for both questions that we pass out all the fruit.

Problem 47 has a geometric interpretation in a coordinate plane. A lattice path in the plane is a "curve" made up of line segments that either go from a point \((i, j)\) to the point \((i+1, j)\) or from a point \((i, j)\) to the point \((i, j+1),\) where \(i\) and \(j\) are integers. (Thus lattice paths always move either up or to the right.) The length of the path is the number of such line segments. (a) What is the length of a lattice path from (0,0) to \((m, n) ?\) (b) How many such lattice paths of that length are there? (h) (c) How many lattice paths are there from \((i, j)\) to \((m, n),\) assuming \(i, j,\) \(m,\) and \(n\) are integers? (n)

As we noted in Problem \(29,\) the first question in Problem 8 asked us for the number of three-element subsets of a twelve-element set. We were able to use the Pascal Equation to get a numerical answer to that question. Had we had twenty or thirty flavors of ice cream to choose from, using the Pascal Equation to get our answer would have entailed a good bit more work. We have seen how the general product principle gives us an answer to Problem 6 . Thus we might think that the number of ways to choose a three element set from 12 elements is the number of ways to choose the first element times the number of ways to choose the second element times the number of ways to choose the third element, which is \(12 \cdot 11 \cdot 10=1320\). However, our result in Problem 29 shows that this is wrong. (a) What is it that is different between the number of ways to stack ice cream in a triple decker cone with three different flavors of ice cream and the number of ways to simply choose three different flavors of ice cream? (b) In particular, how many different triple decker cones use the same three flavors? (Of course any three distinct flavors could substitute for vanilla, chocolate and strawberry without changing the answer.) (c) Using your answer from part b, compute the number of ways to choose three different flavors of ice cream (out of twelve flavors) from the number of ways to choose a triple decker cone with three different flavors (out of twelve flavors).

Let \(C\) be the set of \(k\) -element subsets of \([n]\) that contain the number \(n,\) and let \(D\) be the set of \(k\) -element subsets of \([n]\) that don't contain \(n .\) (a) Let \(C^{\prime}\) be the set of \((k-1)\) -element subsets of \([n-1] .\) Describe a bijection from \(C\) to \(C^{\prime}\). (A verbal description is fine.) (b) Let \(D^{\prime}\) be the set of \(k\) -element subsets of \([n-1]=\\{1,2, \ldots n-1\\}\). Describe a bijection from \(D\) to \(D^{\prime} .\) (A verbal description is fine.) (c) Based on the two previous parts, express the sizes of \(C\) and \(D\) in terms of binomial coefficients involving \(n-1\) instead of \(n\). (d) Apply the sum principle to \(C\) and \(D\) and obtain a formula that expresses \(\left(\begin{array}{l}n \\ k\end{array}\right)\) in terms of two binomial coefficients involving \(n-1\). You have just derived the Pascal Equation that is the basis for the famous Pascal's Triangle.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.