/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Use Lagrange multipliers to find... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use Lagrange multipliers to find the maximum and minimum values of \(f\) subject to the given constraint. Also, find the points at which these extreme values occur. $$ f(x, y, z)=3 x+6 y+2 z ; 2 x^{2}+4 y^{2}+z^{2}=70 $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The maximum value is at \((x, y, z) = \left(\sqrt{\frac{630}{58}}, \sqrt{\frac{630}{58}}, \frac{4}{3}\sqrt{\frac{630}{58}}\right)\) and the minimum is at the negative of these points.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Lagrangian Function

The Lagrangian function is given by combining the function to optimize and the constraint, multiplied by a Lagrange multiplier \(\lambda\). We define it as: \[ \mathcal{L}(x, y, z, \lambda) = 3x + 6y + 2z + \lambda(70 - 2x^2 - 4y^2 - z^2) \]
02

Compute the Partial Derivatives

Calculate the partial derivatives of the Lagrangian with respect to each variable \(x\), \(y\), \(z\), and \(\lambda\):1. \(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x} = 3 - 4x\lambda = 0\) 2. \(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial y} = 6 - 8y\lambda = 0\) 3. \(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial z} = 2 - 2z\lambda = 0\) 4. \(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \lambda} = 70 - 2x^2 - 4y^2 - z^2 = 0\)
03

Solve the System of Equations

From the equations above, solve:1. Solve \(3 = 4x\lambda\) to find \(\lambda = \frac{3}{4x}\).2. Solve \(6 = 8y\lambda\) to find \(\lambda = \frac{3}{4y}\) (equate both expressions for \(\lambda\)).3. Solve \(2 = 2z\lambda\) to find \(\lambda = \frac{1}{z}\).Equating the expressions for \(\lambda\) determines relationships between \(x\), \(y\), and \(z\).
04

Determine Relationship Between Variables

From \(\lambda = \frac{3}{4x} = \frac{3}{4y} = \frac{1}{z}\), solve for \(x\), \(y\), and \(z\):1. \(x = y\) because the expressions for \(\lambda\) in terms of \(x\) and \(y\) are equal.2. \(z = \frac{4}{3}x\) and \(z = \frac{4}{3}y\).
05

Substitute into the Constraint

Substitute the expressions from Step 4 into the constraint:- Constraint: \(2x^2 + 4y^2 + z^2 = 70\)- Substitute \(x = y\) and \(z = \frac{4}{3}x\). This gives: \[ 2x^2 + 4x^2 + \left(\frac{4}{3}x\right)^2 = 70 \]- Simplify and solve for \(x\): \[ 2x^2 + 4x^2 + \frac{16}{9}x^2 = 70 \] \[ \frac{58}{9}x^2 = 70 \]- Solve: \(x^2 = \frac{630}{58}\), \(x = \pm\sqrt{\frac{630}{58}}\).
06

Calculate Corresponding Values for y and z

Using the result for \(x\) from Step 5:- \(y = x\) so \(y = \pm\sqrt{\frac{630}{58}}\)- \(z = \frac{4}{3}x\), so \(z = \pm\frac{4}{3}\sqrt{\frac{630}{58}}\)
07

Find Maximum and Minimum Values

Calculate \(f(x, y, z) = 3x + 6y + 2z\) using the values derived:1. For positive solution: \(x = y = \sqrt{\frac{630}{58}}\), \(z = \frac{4}{3}\sqrt{\frac{630}{58}}\) - \(f(x, y, z) = 3\sqrt{\frac{630}{58}} + 6\sqrt{\frac{630}{58}} + 2\left(\frac{4}{3}\sqrt{\frac{630}{58}}\right)\)2. For negative solution: use \(-\sqrt{\frac{630}{58}}\) instead.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Constraint Optimization
Constraint optimization involves finding the extreme values (maximum or minimum) of a function within a specified region defined by one or more constraints. In the exercise, the function to be optimized is \(f(x, y, z) = 3x + 6y + 2z\), while the constraint is \(2x^2 + 4y^2 + z^2 = 70\). This equation represents a surface in three-dimensional space. The task is to identify points on this surface where the function \(f\) achieves its highest and lowest values.

To solve this, we apply the method of Lagrange multipliers. This method transforms a constrained optimization problem into an unconstrained one by introducing a new variable, called the Lagrange multiplier, denoted as \(\lambda\). It's essential because it helps us find points where the tangent plane to the surface defined by the constraint is parallel to the contour planes of the function we want to optimize.

The constraint optimization technique is particularly useful because it allows the incorporation of constraints directly into the calculus of variations, leading to a system of equations that helps find optimal solutions. By carefully equating and analyzing these equations, the optimization under given constraints becomes more streamlined.
Partial Derivatives
Partial derivatives are crucial in the process of finding extreme points in multivariable functions, like \(f(x, y, z)\). They measure how the function changes as each variable changes, with other variables held constant. In the context of Lagrange multipliers, partial derivatives are used to determine the gradient (a vector of first derivatives) of the function and the constraint.

For the Lagrangian function given in the exercise \(\mathcal{L}(x, y, z, \lambda) = 3x + 6y + 2z + \lambda (70 - 2x^2 - 4y^2 - z^2)\), we compute partial derivatives with respect to each variable \(x, y, z,\) and the multiplier \(\lambda\):
  • \(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x} = 3 - 4x\lambda\)
  • \(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial y} = 6 - 8y\lambda\)
  • \(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial z} = 2 - 2z\lambda\)
  • \(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \lambda} = 70 - 2x^2 - 4y^2 - z^2\)
These derivatives are set to zero to find stationary points, which indicate potential maximum or minimum values. Each equation derived from setting these derivatives to zero represents a condition that must be satisfied. Solving these equations simultaneously provides the critical points needed for optimization. Understanding each step is vital for knowing how different parts of a function interplay.
Lagrangian Function
The Lagrangian function is a cornerstone of the Lagrange multipliers method. It combines the objective function and its constraints into a single function that can be differentiated and optimized using calculus tools. For the exercise, the Lagrangian is formed by adding the original function \(3x + 6y + 2z\) to the constraint \(\lambda (70 - 2x^2 - 4y^2 - z^2)\), where \(\lambda\) is the key to balancing the optimization and constraint simultaneously.

The beauty of the Lagrangian lies in its ability to incorporate constraints seamlessly, turning the problem into an unconstrained one by introducing the multiplier. This unification into \(\mathcal{L}(x, y, z, \lambda)\) makes it possible to use differential calculus techniques universally:
  • This approach enforces the constraint such that as we optimize, we do not stray out of the permissible region defined by \(2x^2 + 4y^2 + z^2 = 70\).
  • Each term involving \(\lambda\) in the Lagrangian ensures that the constraint is upheld while seeking the optimal \(f(x, y, z)\).
When we solve the system of equations derived from the partial derivatives of the Lagrangian, we essentially find conditions that must be met at extreme points. By understanding how the Lagrangian is constructed and manipulated, we gain a powerful toolset for solving complex optimization problems. The variable \(\lambda\) acts as a balance between optimizing the function and maintaining the constraint, providing insight into sensitivity and tolerance within solutions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The volume of a right circular cone of radius \(r\) and height \(h\) is \(V=\frac{1}{3} \pi r^{2} h .\) Show that if the height remains constant while the radius changes, then the volume satisfies $$ \frac{\partial V}{\partial r}=\frac{2 V}{r} $$

A common problem in experimental work is to obtain a mathematical relationship \(y=f(x)\) between two variables \(x\) and \(y\) by "fitting" a curve to points in the plane that correspond to experimentally determined values of \(x\) and \(y,\) say $$ \left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right),\left(x_{2}, y_{2}\right), \ldots,\left(x_{n}, y_{n}\right) $$ The curve \(y=f(x)\) is called a mathematical model of the data. The general form of the function \(f\) is commonly determined by some underlying physical principle, but sometimes it is just determined by the pattern of the data. We are concerned with fitting a straight line \(y=m x+b\) to data. Usually, the data will not lie on a line (possibly due to experimental error or variations in experimental conditions), so the problem is to find a line that fits the data "best" according to some criterion. One criterion for selecting the line of best fit is to choose \(m\) and \(b\) to minimize the function $$ g(m, b)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(m x_{i}+b-y_{i}\right)^{2} $$ This is called the method of least squares, and the resulting line is called the regression line or the least squares line of best fit. Geometrically, \(\left|m x_{i}+b-y_{i}\right|\) is the vertical distance between the data point \(\left(x_{i}, y_{i}\right)\) and the line \(y=m x+b\) These vertical distances are called the residuals of the data points, so the effect of minimizing \(g(m, b)\) is to minimize the sum of the squares of the residuals. In these exercises, we will derive a formula for the regression line. The purpose of this exercise is to find the values of \(m\) and \(b\) that produce the regression line. (a) To minimize \(g(m, b),\) we start by finding values of \(m\) and \(b\) such that \(\partial g / \partial m=0\) and \(\partial g / \partial b=0 .\) Show that these equations are satisfied if \(m\) and \(b\) satisfy the conditions $$ \left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{2}\right) m+\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}\right) b=\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i} y_{i} $$ \(\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}\right) m+n b=\sum_{i=1}^{n} y_{i}\) (b) Let \(\bar{x}=\left(x_{1}+x_{2}+\cdots+x_{n}\right) / n\) denote the arithmetic average of \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n} .\) Use the fact that $$ \sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2} \geq 0 $$ to show that $$ n\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{2}\right)-\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}\right)^{2} \geq 0 $$ with equality if and only if all the \(x_{i}\) 's are the same. (c) Assuming that not all the \(x_{i}\) 's are the same, prove that the equations in part (a) have the unique solution $$ \begin{aligned} m=& \frac{n \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i} y_{i}-\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i} \sum_{i=1}^{n} y_{i}}{n \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{2}-\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}\right)^{2}} \\ b=& \frac{1}{n}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} y_{i}-m \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}\right) \end{aligned} $$ [Note: We have shown that \(g\) has a critical point at these values of \(m\) and \(b\). In the next exercise we will show that \(g\) has an absolute minimum at this critical point. Accepting this to be so, we have shown that the line \(y=m x+b\) is the regression line for these values of \(m \text { and } b .]\)

Find the indicated partial derivatives. $$ \begin{array}{l}{w=r \cos s t+e^{u} \sin u r} \\ {\partial w / \partial r, \partial w / \partial s, \partial w / \partial t, \quad \partial w / \partial u}\end{array} $$

Find \(\partial w / \partial x, \partial w / \partial y,\) and \(\partial w / \partial z\) using implicit differentiation. Leave your answers in terms of \(x, y, z,\) and \(w .\) $$ \left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}+w^{2}\right)^{3 / 2}=4 $$

Given \(f(x, y)=y^{3} e^{-5 x},\) find $$\begin{array}{llll}{\text { (a) } f_{x y y}(0,1)} & {\text { (b) } f_{x x x}(0,1)} & {\text { (c) } f_{y y x x}(0,1)}\end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.