/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 57 Maximizing a sum. Find the max... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Maximizing a sum. Find the maximum value of \(x_{1}+x_{2}+x_{3}+x_{4}\) subject to the condition that \(x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}^{2}+x_{3}^{2}+x_{4}^{2}=16\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The maximum value of x鈧 + x鈧 + x鈧 + x鈧 under the given constraint is 8, which occurs when (x鈧, x鈧, x鈧, x鈧) = (2, 2, 2, 2).

Step by step solution

01

Set up the Lagrange function

We start by setting up the Lagrange function which is \(L(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, \lambda) = F(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4) - \lambda G(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4)\). In our case, the Lagrange function will be: \(L(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, \lambda) = (x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4) - \lambda (x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2 - 16)\)
02

Compute the gradient of L

Now we need to find the gradient of L for critical points. Compute the partial derivatives with respect to \(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, \text{and } \lambda\), and set them equal to 0: \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial x_1} = 1 - 2\lambda x_1 = 0\) \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial x_2} = 1 - 2\lambda x_2 = 0\) \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial x_3} = 1 - 2\lambda x_3 = 0\) \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial x_4} = 1 - 2\lambda x_4 = 0\) \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \lambda} = x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2 - 16 = 0\)
03

Solve the equations found in step 2

From the partial derivatives equal to 0: \(x_1 = x_2 = x_3 = x_4 = \frac{1}{2\lambda}\) Substituting these values back into the constraint \(G(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4) = 0\), we get: \(\frac{1}{4\lambda^2} + \frac{1}{4\lambda^2} + \frac{1}{4\lambda^2} + \frac{1}{4\lambda^2} - 16 = 0\) Solving for \(\lambda\), we find two possible values: \(\lambda = \frac{1}{4}\) or \(\lambda = -\frac{1}{4}\).
04

Calculate the critical points

Using the values of \(\lambda\) found in step 3, we can now calculate the critical points: For \(\lambda = \frac{1}{4}\), the critical point is \((2, 2, 2, 2)\), and the value of the objective function at this point is \(F(2, 2, 2, 2) = 2+2+2+2=8\). For \(\lambda = -\frac{1}{4}\), we get the critical point \((-2, -2, -2, -2)\). The value of the objective function is \(F(-2, -2, -2, -2) = -2-2-2-2=-8\).
05

Determine the maximum value

Now, we compare the values from step 4. We are looking for the maximum value of the sum, and since \(8 > -8\), the maximum value of \(x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4\) under the given constraint is \(8\) which occurs when \((x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4) = (2, 2, 2, 2)\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Maximization Problems
Maximization problems occur when we're aiming to find the greatest possible value of a particular function. Here, for example, we seek to maximize the sum \(x_{1}+x_{2}+x_{3}+x_{4}\). This involves looking at how these values can be adjusted, given certain limitations or constraints. It鈥檚 the process of adjusting the variables to find the most favorable outcome. In real life, maximization problems help with decisions like maximizing profits or optimizing resources.
To tackle such a problem successfully, you need to clearly identify the function you want to maximize. Then, examine any restrictions or conditions that might affect the variables involved. Often these restrictions form an equation that helps guide the maximization process. With this clear picture, you can employ techniques such as setting up an appropriate mathematical model, using derivatives, or employing specialized strategies like Lagrange multipliers to find the solution.
Constraint Optimization
Constraint optimization is a fascinating aspect of mathematical optimization in which you find the best outcome within given limitations. In this exercise, the constraint is expressed as \(x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}^{2}+x_{3}^{2}+x_{4}^{2}=16\). Constraints can take various forms, such as equations or inequalities, and impose necessary conditions that solutions must adhere to.
Managing these constraints requires balancing the desire to maximize or minimize an objective with the need to satisfy other criteria. The challenge lies in working within these boundaries while finding an optimal solution. Techniques such as the Lagrange multipliers are particularly helpful here because they allow you to incorporate constraints directly into the optimization process. By adjusting both the variables of interest and the Lagrange multipliers, one can maneuver towards a solution that meets all conditions.
Gradient Calculation
Gradient calculation is a crucial step in solving maximization problems with constraints. It involves finding the gradient of a function, which gives us a vector indicating the direction of the steepest ascent. In this exercise, we calculate the gradient of the Lagrange function \(L(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, \lambda)\).
To find critical points where potential maxima or minima might occur, one takes the partial derivative of the Lagrange function with respect to each variable and the Lagrange multiplier \(\lambda\). Setting these derivatives equal to zero helps determine points where the function doesn鈥檛 increase or decrease, indicating possible solutions under the defined constraints. This step bridges the objective of maximizing the function and the necessity to comply with the constraint, leading to viable critical points that represent optimal solutions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain why or why not Determine whether the following statements are true and give an explanation or counterexample. a. Suppose you are standing at the center of a sphere looking at a point \(P\) on the surface of the sphere. Your line of sight to \(P\) is orthogonal to the plane tangent to the sphere at \(P\)b. At a point that maximizes \(f\) on the curve \(g(x, y)=0,\) the dot product \(\nabla f \cdot \nabla g\) is zero.

A snapshot (frozen in time) of a set of water waves is described by the function \(z=1+\sin (x-y),\) where \(z\) gives the height of the waves and \((x, y)\) are coordinates in the horizontal plane \(z=0\) a. Use a graphing utility to graph \(z=1+\sin (x-y)\) b. The crests and the troughs of the waves are aligned in the direction in which the height function has zero change. Find the direction in which the crests and troughs are aligned. c. If you were surfing on one of these waves and wanted the steepest descent from the crest to the trough, in which direction would you point your surfboard (given in terms of a unit vector in the \(x y\) -plane)? d. Check that your answers to parts (b) and (c) are consistent with the graph of part (a).

Use what you learned about surfaces in Sections 13.5 and 13.6 to sketch a graph of the following functions. In each case, identify the surface and state the domain and range of the function. $$H(x, y)=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}$$

Powers and roots Assume \(x+y+z=1\) with \(x \geq 0, y \geq 0\) and \(z \geq 0\) a. Find the maximum and minimum values of \(\left(1+x^{2}\right)\left(1+y^{2}\right)\left(1+z^{2}\right)\) b. Find the maximum and minimum values of \((1+\sqrt{x})(1+\sqrt{y})(1+\sqrt{z})\)

Heron's formula The area of a triangle with sides of length \(a, b\) and \(c\) is given by a formula from antiquity called Heron's formula: $$A=\sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)}$$ where \(s=\frac{1}{2}(a+b+c)\) is the semiperimeter of the triangle. a. Find the partial derivatives \(A_{\sigma}, A_{b},\) and \(A_{c}\) b. A triangle has sides of length \(a=2, b=4, c=5 .\) Estimate the change in the area when \(a\) increases by \(0.03, b\) decreases by \(0.08,\) and \(c\) increases by 0.6 c. For an equilateral triangle with \(a=b=c,\) estimate the percent change in the area when all sides increase in length by \(p \% .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.