/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 Determine whether the following ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Determine whether the following series converge. $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{k+1} k^{1 / k}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The given alternating series diverges.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the terms of the series and check if they are decreasing

In the given series, we can identify that the sequence \(a_k\) is given by \(a_k = k^{1/k}\). To check if the terms are decreasing, we need to check if \(a_k \ge a_{k+1}\) for all \(k\). We can check this condition by taking the derivative of the terms with respect to \(k\). Let's take the derivative of \(a_k\): $$\frac{d}{dk}k^{1/k} = \frac{d}{dk}(e^{\frac{\ln{k}}{k}})$$ We can apply the chain rule for derivatives here: $$\frac{d}{dk}k^{1/k} = e^{\frac{\ln{k}}{k}}\frac{d}{dk}\frac{\ln{k}}{k}$$ Now, we need to find the derivative of \(\frac{\ln{k}}{k}\) using the quotient rule: $$\frac{d}{dk}\frac{\ln{k}}{k} = \frac{k\frac{1}{k} - \ln{k}(1)}{k^2} = \frac{1-\ln{k}}{k^2}$$ The derivative of \(a_k\) is: $$\frac{d}{dk}k^{1/k} = e^{\frac{\ln{k}}{k}}\frac{1-\ln{k}}{k^2}$$ From the result, we can see that the derivative is negative when \(\ln{k}>1\) (i.e., \(k > e\)), which means that the terms are decreasing for \(k>e\). Since our series starts from \(k=1\), we can ignore the first few terms that do not satisfy this decreasing property, as it does not affect the convergence or divergence of the series. Thus, the first condition of the Alternating Series Test is met.
02

Check if the limit of the terms approaches zero

The next step is to check if the limit of the terms approaches zero, i.e., \(\lim_{k \to \infty} a_k = 0\). $$\lim_{k \to \infty} k^{1/k} = \lim_{x \to \infty} e^{\frac{\ln{k}}{k}}$$ We can use L'Hopital's rule on the exponent to find the limit: $$\lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{\ln{k}}{k} = \lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{\frac{1}{k}}{1} = \lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{1}{k} = 0$$ Since the limit of the exponent is zero, the limit of the terms is: $$\lim_{k \to \infty} k^{1/k} = e^0 = 1 \neq 0$$ The second condition of the Alternating Series Test is not met.
03

Conclusion

Since the second condition is not met, the given alternating series $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{k+1} k^{1 / k}$$ does not converge according to the Alternating Series Test.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Series Convergence
In mathematics, determining whether a series converges is crucial in understanding its behavior as more and more terms are added. A series is essentially the sum of a sequence of numbers, where each number follows a specific pattern or rule. When we discuss series convergence, we are asking if, as we sum the terms of the series, the total approaches a specific number or not. If it does, the series converges. If it does not, the series diverges. Converging series often result in finite sums, even if they appear to go on indefinitely. In our problem, the series involves terms that alternate in sign, and special methods must be used to determine convergence. Approaching such problems often involves powerful tools like the Alternating Series Test, which provides a way to ascertain if a series that changes sign will settle to a specific value.
Derivative
The derivative is a tool in calculus that helps us understand how a function changes at any given point. It gives us the rate at which the function's value is changing as the input changes, often interpreted as the slope of the function at that point. For the given series, the sequence of terms is expressed in the form \( a_k = k^{1/k} \). To check if these terms decrease as \( k \) gets larger, we need to examine their derivative with respect to \( k \). Finding the derivative shows whether the sequence increases or decreases. By calculating the derivative, you can conclude that the terms of \( k^{1/k} \) begin to decrease after a certain point, making it useful in applying criteria such as the Alternating Series Test. It is through understanding the behavior of this derivative that helps in assessing whether these terms decrease sufficiently to affect convergence.
L'Hôpital's Rule
L'Hôpital's Rule is a powerful technique in calculus used to evaluate limits, especially when you're faced with an indeterminate form like \( \frac{0}{0} \) or \( \frac{\infty}{\infty} \). By differentiating the numerator and denominator separately, L'Hôpital's Rule allows you to solve these tricky limits. In the problem at hand, L'Hôpital's Rule is applied to calculate the limit of \( \frac{\ln{k}}{k} \) as \( k \) approaches infinity. Despite seeming complex, this limit is crucial in understanding the converging nature of the series terms. By successfully applying the rule, we determine that this limit approaches zero, indicating that the growth rate of \( \ln{k} \) is outpaced by \( k \). However, it ultimately does not aid in fulfilling the Alternating Series Test since the sequence does not converge to \( 0 \).
Alternating Series Test
The Alternating Series Test is a fundamental method used to determine the convergence of series where the terms alternate between positive and negative. This test has two main criteria:
  • The absolute value of the terms \( |a_k| \) must be decreasing.
  • The limit of the sequence of terms must approach zero, \( \lim_{k \to \infty} a_k = 0 \).
In the original exercise, the series satisfies the first condition because the terms eventually decrease as confirmed by the derivative. However, the challenge appears with the second condition.Despite the sequence's alternating nature, the limit \( \lim_{k \to \infty} k^{1/k} \) is \( 1 \) and not zero, leading to the conclusion that the series does not converge. Understanding both conditions and how they're evaluated is key to determining the convergence of alternating series using this test.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Here is a fascinating (unsolved) problem known as the hailstone problem (or the Ulam Conjecture or the Collatz Conjecture). It involves sequences in two different ways. First, choose a positive integer \(N\) and call it \(a_{0} .\) This is the seed of a sequence. The rest of the sequence is generated as follows: For \(n=0,1,2, \ldots\) $$a_{n+1}=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll} a_{n} / 2 & \text { if } a_{n} \text { is even } \\ 3 a_{n}+1 & \text { if } a_{n} \text { is odd .} \end{array}\right.$$ However, if \(a_{n}=1\) for any \(n,\) then the sequence terminates. a. Compute the sequence that results from the seeds \(N=2,3\), \(4, \ldots, 10 .\) You should verify that in all these cases, the sequence eventually terminates. The hailstone conjecture (still unproved) states that for all positive integers \(N\), the sequence terminates after a finite number of terms. b. Now define the hailstone sequence \(\left\\{H_{k}\right\\},\) which is the number of terms needed for the sequence \(\left\\{a_{n}\right\\}\) to terminate starting with a seed of \(k\). Verify that \(H_{2}=1, H_{3}=7\), and \(H_{4}=2\). c. Plot as many terms of the hailstone sequence as is feasible. How did the sequence get its name? Does the conjecture appear to be true?

A fishery manager knows that her fish population naturally increases at a rate of \(1.5 \%\) per month. At the end of each month, 120 fish are harvested. Let \(F_{n}\) be the fish population after the \(n\) th month, where \(F_{0}=4000\) fish. Assume that this process continues indefinitely. Use infinite series to find the longterm (steady-state) population of the fish.

Consider the following situations that generate a sequence. a. Write out the first five terms of the sequence. b. Find an explicit formula for the terms of the sequence. c. Find a recurrence relation that generates the sequence. d. Using a calculator or a graphing utility, estimate the limit of the sequence or state that it does not exist. Population growth When a biologist begins a study, a colony of prairie dogs has a population of \(250 .\) Regular measurements reveal that each month the prairie dog population increases by \(3 \%\) Let \(p_{n}\) be the population (rounded to whole numbers) at the end of the \(n\) th month, where the initial population is \(p_{0}=250\).

In the following exercises, two sequences are given, one of which initially has smaller values, but eventually "overtakes" the other sequence. Find the sequence with the larger growth rate and the value of \(n\) at which it overtakes the other sequence. $$a_{n}=n ! \text { and } b_{n}=n^{0.7 n}, n \geq 2$$

Use the formal definition of the limit of a sequence to prove the following limits. $$\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{n}{n^{2}+1}=0$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.