/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 Evaluate the following integrals... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Evaluate the following integrals. \(\int_{-2}^{2} \frac{e^{z / 2}}{e^\)\int_{-2}^{2} \frac{e^{z / 2}}{1+e^{z / 2}} d z=2\({z / 2}+1} d z\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: \(8 - 4 \ln\left|\frac{1 + e}{1 + e^{-1}}\right|\)

Step by step solution

01

Find the antiderivative

To find the antiderivative of the given function, we will proceed with a substitution technique. Let \(u = e^{\frac{z}{2}}\), then \(\frac{d u}{d z} = \frac{1}{2} e^{\frac{z}{2}}\). Now substitute in the integral. \(\int \frac{e^{z/2}}{1+e^{z/2}} d z = \int \frac{2 \cdot u}{1 + u} \frac{dz}{du} du = 2 \int \frac{u}{1 + u} du\) Now, we will perform partial fraction decomposition on \(\frac{u}{1 + u}\). Notice that \(\frac{u}{1+u} = 1 - \frac{1}{1+u}\). Therefore, our integral becomes: \(2 \int \frac{u}{1 + u} d u = 2 \int (1 - \frac{1}{1 + u}) d u\) Now, we can integrate each term separately: \(2 \int (1 - \frac{1}{1 + u}) d u = 2(u - \ln |1 + u|) + C = 2(z-\ln |1+ e^{\frac{z}{2}}|) + C\)
02

Evaluate the definite integral

Now that we have found the antiderivative, we can evaluate the definite integral using the fundamental theorem of calculus: \(\int_{-2}^{2} \frac{e^{z / 2}}{1 + e^{z / 2}} d z = 2 \left[\left(z-\ln |1+ e^{\frac{z}{2}}|\right) \Big|_{-2}^{2}\right]\) First, substitute the upper limit \(z = 2\): \(2 \left( 2 - \ln |1 + e^{(2/2)}| \right) = 2 (2 - \ln|1 + e^1|)\) Then, substitute the lower limit \(z = -2\): \(2 \left( -2 - \ln |1 + e^{(-2/2)}| \right) = 2 (-2 - \ln|1 + e^{-1}|)\) Finally, subtract these two expressions: \(2 (2 - \ln|1 + e^1|) - 2 (-2 - \ln|1 + e^{-1}|) = 2(2 - \ln|1 + e^1| + 2 + \ln|1 + e^{-1}|) \) \(= 2 (4 - \ln|1 + e^1| + \ln|1 + e^{-1}|) = 4 - 2[\ln|1 + e^1| - \ln|1 + e^{-1}|]\) Using a logarithmic property, combine the logarithms: \(4 - 2[\ln\left|\frac{1 + e^1}{1 + e^{-1}}\right|] = 8 - 4 \ln\left|\frac{1 + e}{1 + e^{-1}}\right|\) Thus, the value of the integral is: \(\int_{-2}^{2} \frac{e^{z / 2}}{1 + e^{z / 2}} d z = 8 - 4 \ln\left|\frac{1 + e}{1 + e^{-1}}\right|\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Antiderivative of Exponential Functions
The calculation of antiderivatives, or indefinite integrals, of exponential functions is a fundamental skill in calculus. These functions take the form of \(e^{kx}\), where \(e\) is the base of the natural logarithm and \(k\) is a constant. The antiderivative of an exponential function is straightforward, and it's given by \(\frac{1}{k}e^{kx} + C\), where \(C\) is the integration constant. This is because the rate of change, or the derivative, of \(e^{kx}\) is \(ke^{kx}\), making the process of finding its antiderivative somewhat of a reverse operation.

In our example, for the integrand \(e^{z/2}\), the antiderivative can be initially puzzling due to the presence of \(z/2\) in the exponent. But by applying the aforementioned antiderivative formula for exponential functions, we arrive at \(2e^{z/2}\), after adjusting for the constant multiplying the variable in the exponent. Understanding this rule helps demystify why the substitution method used in the solution is necessary to simplify and subsequently integrate the function.
Substitution Method for Integration
The substitution method is a powerful tool in calculus, especially when dealing with complex integrands. This technique, often referred to as a u-substitution, involves replacing a portion of the integrand with a new variable to simplify the integral.

The general approach is to identify a part of the integrand that, when differentiated, appears elsewhere in the integrand. A new variable \(u\) replaces this part, and the differential \(du\) is calculated to replace \(dx\) or whichever variable is used. This transformation converts the original integral into one that is often easier to evaluate. In our exercise, the substitution \(u = e^{z/2}\) was made, which turned a seemingly complex function into a simpler one that could be integrated directly.
Partial Fraction Decomposition
Partial fraction decomposition is used to break down complex rational expressions into simpler fractional components that are easier to integrate. This method is applicable when the degree of the numerator is less than the degree of the denominator in a rational expression.

To apply this technique, one starts by factoring the denominator of the rational expression and then expressing the function as a sum of fractions, where each fraction has one of the factors in the denominator. Coefficients for these fractions are then found by various methods, such as equating coefficients or plugging in suitable values for the variables. In our exercise, the expression \(\frac{u}{1+u}\) was decomposed into \(1 - \frac{1}{1+u}\), allowing us to integrate the function term by term.
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
At the heart of calculus lies the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, which connects the processes of differentiation and integration. This theorem has two parts, with the first part stating that if a function \(f\) is continuous on an interval \([a, b]\) and \(F\) is an antiderivative of \(f\) on that interval, then \(F\)'s derivative is \(f\). The second part establishes the principle for evaluating definite integrals: If \(F\) is the antiderivative of \(f\) on \([a, b]\), then the definite integral of \(f\) from \(a\) to \(b\) is given by \(F(b) - F(a)\).

This theorem is used in the last step of our exercise where, after finding the antiderivative, the definite integral from \(-2\) to \(2\) was evaluated by plugging in the limits of integration – a process colloquially known as 'plugging in the bounds'. Grasping both the intuition and the application of this theorem is indispensable for solving many problems in calculus.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A body of mass \(m\) is suspended by a rod of length \(L\) that pivots without friction (see figure). The mass is slowly lifted along a circular arc to a height \(h\) a. Assuming that the only force acting on the mass is the gravitational force, show that the component of this force acting along the arc of motion is \(F=m g \sin \theta\) b. Noting that an element of length along the path of the pendulum is \(d s=L d \theta,\) evaluate an integral in \(\theta\) to show that the work done in lifting the mass to a height \(h\) is \(m g h\)

Miscellaneous integrals Evaluate the following integrals. \(\int_{0}^{\ln 2} \frac{e^{3 x}-e^{-3 x}}{e^{3 x}+e^{-3 x}} d x\)

Use a calculator to evaluate each expression or state that the value does not exist. Report answers accurate to four decimal places. a. \(\coth 4\) b. \(\tanh ^{-1} 2\) c. \(\operatorname{csch}^{-1} 5\) d. \(\left.\operatorname{csch} x\right|_{1 / 2} ^{2}\) e. \(\left.\ln \left|\tanh \left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\right|\right|_{1} ^{10}\) f. \(\left.\tan ^{-1}(\sinh x)\right|_{-3} ^{3}\) g. \(\left.\frac{1}{4} \operatorname{coth}^{-1} \frac{x}{4}\right|_{20} ^{36}\)

Kelly started at noon \((t=0)\) riding a bike from Niwot to Berthoud, a distance of \(20 \mathrm{km},\) with velocity \(v(t)=15 /(t+1)^{2}\) (decreasing because of fatigue). Sandy started at noon \((t=0)\) riding a bike in the opposite direction from Berthoud to Niwot with velocity \(u(t)=20 /(t+1)^{2}\) (also decreasing because of fatigue). Assume distance is measured in kilometers and time is measured in hours. a. Make a graph of Kelly's distance from Niwot as a function of time. b. Make a graph of Sandy's distance from Berthoud as a function of time. c. When do they meet? How far has each person traveled when they meet? d. More generally, if the riders' speeds are \(v(t)=A /(t+1)^{2}\) and \(u(t)=B /(t+1)^{2}\) and the distance between the towns is \(\vec{D},\) what conditions on \(A, B,\) and \(D\) must be met to ensure that the riders will pass each other? e. Looking ahead: With the velocity functions given in part (d), make a conjecture about the maximum distance each person can ride (given unlimited time).

The same exponential growth function can be written in the forms \(y(t)=y_{0} e^{k t}, y(t)=y_{0}(1+r)^{t}\) and \(y(t)=y_{0} 2^{t / T_{2}} .\) Write \(k\) as a function of \(r, r\) as a function of \(T_{2}\), and \(T_{2}\) as a function of \(k\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.