/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 Why does absolute convergence im... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Why does absolute convergence imply convergence?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A: Absolute convergence implies convergence because the sequence of partial sums of an absolutely convergent series satisfies the Cauchy criterion for convergence. Specifically, for any given ε > 0, there exists a positive integer N such that for all natural numbers m, n with m > n ≥ N, we have |S_m - S_n| < ε. This ensures that the original series converges.

Step by step solution

01

Intuition behind Absolute Convergence

Absolute convergence means that the series obtained by taking the absolute values of the terms converges. In other words, if we have a series ∑a_n, then it is absolutely convergent if ∑|a_n| converges. Absolute convergence is stronger than convergence, and it implies convergence.
02

Cauchy Criterion for Convergence

A sequence of partial sums {S_n} converges if and only if for any given ε > 0, there exists a positive integer N such that for all natural numbers m, n with m > n ≥ N, we have |S_m - S_n| < ε. This is called the Cauchy criterion for convergence. We will use this criterion to show why absolute convergence implies convergence.
03

Proof: Absolute Convergence Implies Convergence

Let's consider an absolutely convergent series ∑a_n. This means ∑|a_n| converges. To prove convergence of ∑a_n, we need to show that the sequence of partial sums {S_n} satisfies the Cauchy criterion for convergence. Suppose ε > 0 is given. Since ∑|a_n| converges, there exists a positive integer N such that for all natural numbers m, n with m > n ≥ N, we have: |(\sum_{k=n+1}^{m} |a_k|)| < ε. Now, let's consider the sequence of partial sums {S_n} for the original series ∑a_n. We have: |S_m - S_n| = |(\sum_{k=n+1}^{m} a_k)| ≤ (\sum_{k=n+1}^{m} |a_k|). The inequality is justified by the triangle inequality. Since we already have |(\sum_{k=n+1}^{m} |a_k|)| < ε for m > n ≥ N, this means: |S_m - S_n| ≤ (\sum_{k=n+1}^{m} |a_k|) < ε. Thus, the sequence of partial sums {S_n} satisfies the Cauchy criterion for convergence, and it follows that the original series ∑a_n converges. This proves that absolute convergence implies convergence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose a function \(f\) is defined by the geometric series \(f(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} x^{k}\) a. Evaluate \(f(0), f(0.2), f(0.5), f(1),\) and \(f(1.5),\) if possible. b. What is the domain of \(f ?\)

Determine whether the following series converge absolutely or conditionally, or diverge. $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k}}{k^{2 / 3}}$$

a. Sketch the function \(f(x)=1 / x\) on the interval \([1, n+1]\) where \(n\) is a positive integer. Use this graph to verify that $$ \ln (n+1)<1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\cdots+\frac{1}{n}<1+\ln n $$ b. Let \(S_{n}\) be the sum of the first \(n\) terms of the harmonic series, so part (a) says \(\ln (n+1)0,\) for \(n=1,2,3, \ldots\) c. Using a figure similar to that used in part (a), show that $$ \frac{1}{n+1}>\ln (n+2)-\ln (n+1) $$ d. Use parts (a) and (c) to show that \(\left\\{E_{n}\right\\}\) is an increasing sequence \(\left(E_{n+1}>E_{n}\right)\) e. Use part (a) to show that \(\left\\{E_{n}\right\\}\) is bounded above by 1 f. Conclude from parts (d) and (e) that \(\left\\{E_{n}\right\\}\) has a limit less than or equal to \(1 .\) This limit is known as Euler's constant and is denoted \(\gamma\) (the Greek lowercase gamma). g. By computing terms of \(\left\\{E_{n}\right\\},\) estimate the value of \(\gamma\) and compare it to the value \(\gamma \approx 0.5772 .\) (It has been conjectured, but not proved, that \(\gamma\) is irrational.) h. The preceding arguments show that the sum of the first \(n\) terms of the harmonic series satisfy \(S_{n} \approx 0.5772+\ln (n+1)\) How many terms must be summed for the sum to exceed \(10 ?\)

Given that \(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^{4}}=\frac{\pi^{4}}{90},\) show that \(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k+1}}{k^{4}}=\frac{7 \pi^{4}}{720}.\) (Assume the result of Exercise 63.)

A well-known method for approximating \(\sqrt{c}\) for positive real numbers \(c\) consists of the following recurrence relation (based on Newton's method). Let \(a_{0}=c\) and $$a_{n+1}=\frac{1}{2}\left(a_{n}+\frac{c}{a_{n}}\right), \quad \text { for } n=0,1,2,3, \dots$$ a. Use this recurrence relation to approximate \(\sqrt{10} .\) How many terms of the sequence are needed to approximate \(\sqrt{10}\) with an error less than \(0.01 ?\) How many terms of the sequence are needed to approximate \(\sqrt{10}\) with an error less than \(0.0001 ?\) (To compute the error, assume a calculator gives the exact value.) b. Use this recurrence relation to approximate \(\sqrt{c},\) for \(c=2\) \(3, \ldots, 10 .\) Make a table showing how many terms of the sequence are needed to approximate \(\sqrt{c}\) with an error less than \(0.01.\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.