/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 56 Determine whether the following ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Determine whether the following series converge absolutely or conditionally, or diverge. $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k+1} e^{k}}{(k+1) !}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The series converges conditionally.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Type of Convergence by the Alternating Series Test

To apply the Alternating Series Test, we need to ensure that two conditions are met: 1. The terms of the sequence should decrease in absolute value, i.e., (write the sequence without the (-1) term) 2. The limit of the sequence should equal 0. Let's call the series $$S$$, then: $$S = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k+1} e^{k}}{(k+1) !}$$ Now, let's find the absolute value of the sequence without the (-1) term: $$a_k = \frac{e^{k}}{(k+1)!}$$
02

Show That the Terms Decrease in Absolute Value

To show that the terms of the sequence $$a_k = \frac{e^{k}}{(k+1)!}$$ decrease, we must show that $$a_{k+1} < a_k$$ for all $$k$$. Let's analyze the ratio of consecutive terms, $$\frac{a_{k+1}}{a_k} = \frac{\frac{e^{k+1}}{(k+2)!}}{\frac{e^{k}}{(k+1)!}}$$ To find the ratio, we can simplify the expression: $$\frac{a_{k+1}}{a_k} = \frac{e^{k+1}(k+1)!}{e^k (k+2)!} = \frac{e}{k+2}$$ Since the ratio is less than 1 for all $$k$$, the terms of $$a_k$$ decrease.
03

Find the Limit of the Sequence

We can now find the limit of the sequence $$a_k$$: $$\lim_{k\to \infty} \frac{e^{k}}{(k+1) !}$$ Here, we have exponentials in the numerator and factorials in the denominator. We know that factorials grow faster than exponentials, so the limit is: $$\lim_{k\to \infty} \frac{e^{k}}{(k+1) !} = 0$$ The limit equals 0, so the second condition for the Alternating Series Test is met.
04

Determine Convergence Using the Alternating Series Test

Since both conditions for the Alternating Series Test are met, the original series S converges conditionally. It means that: $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k+1} e^{k}}{(k+1) !}$$ converges conditionally.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Convergence of Series
The convergence of a series refers to whether the sum of its infinite terms approaches a finite number as the number of terms increases. In mathematics, not all series will converge; some will diverge, meaning the series sums to infinity. In this case, we examine whether the series converges absolutely, converges conditionally, or diverges. When using the Alternating Series Test, we identify convergence in an alternating series by checking two key conditions:
  • The absolute value of the terms must form a decreasing sequence. Essentially, each term in the series should be smaller in absolute value than the term before it.
  • The limit of the sequence of terms must be zero as the number of terms tends to infinity.
If these conditions are met, the series converges according to this test. However, it's crucial to determine whether this convergence is conditional or absolute since this impacts the overall behavior of the series.
Factorials vs Exponentials
Factorials, denoted as \( n! \), represent the product of all positive integers up to \( n \). They grow very rapidly because each number multiplies a larger sequence of integers. For example, \( 5! = 5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1 = 120 \). Compare this to an exponential function, \( e^n \), which grows quickly but not as fast as a factorial.In the context of the series \( a_k = \frac{e^k}{(k+1)!} \), we see an interplay between exponential growth in the numerator and factorial growth in the denominator. As \( k \) increases, \( (k+1)! \), the factorial term, increases much faster compared to \( e^k \), the exponential term. This rapid growth of the factorial term effectively diminishes each term in the series more quickly, creating the decrease necessary for convergence as suggested in the original exercise. Thus, when comparing factorials versus exponentials in series, the dominance of the factorial often plays a crucial role in determining whether a series converges or diverges.
Conditional Convergence
Conditional convergence occurs when a series converges according to the Alternating Series Test, but does not converge absolutely. A series converges absolutely if the series of the absolute values of its terms also converges. For our series, after removing the alternating terms \( (-1)^{k+1} \), the resulting series \( \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{e^k}{(k+1)!} \) does not converge. Since the series \( \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{e^k}{(k+1)!} \) diverges, but the original series with the alternating sign meets the criteria of the Alternating Series Test, it implies conditional convergence. This simply means that the convergence depends heavily on the alternating sign and the balance it provides.Understanding the concept of conditional convergence is vital, as it reflects a situation where different tests for convergence might yield different insights. It highlights the necessity to carefully scrutinize the absolute convergence alongside conditional convergence to gain a full picture of a series' behavior.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The famous Fibonacci sequence was proposed by Leonardo Pisano, also known as Fibonacci, in about A.D. 1200 as a model for the growth of rabbit populations. It is given by the recurrence relation \(f_{n+1}=f_{n}+f_{n-1}\), for \(n=1,2,3, \ldots,\) where \(f_{0}=0, f_{1}=1 .\) Each term of the sequence is the sum of its two predecessors. a. Write out the first ten terms of the sequence. b. Is the sequence bounded? c. Estimate or determine \(\varphi=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{f_{n+1}}{f_{n}},\) the ratio of the successive terms of the sequence. Provide evidence that \(\varphi=(1+\sqrt{5}) / 2,\) a number known as the golden mean. d. Verify the remarkable result that $$f_{n}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\left(\varphi^{n}-(-1)^{n} \varphi^{-n}\right)$$

Consider the expression \(\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\cdots}}}},\) where the process continues indefinitely. a. Show that this expression can be built in steps using. the recurrence relation \(a_{0}=1, a_{n+1}=\sqrt{1+a_{n}},\) for \(n=0,1,2,3, \ldots .\) Explain why the value of the expression can be interpreted as \(\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n}\). b. Evaluate the first five terms of the sequence \(\left\\{a_{n}\right\\}\). c. Estimate the limit of the sequence. Compare your estimate with \((1+\sqrt{5}) / 2,\) a number known as the golden mean. d. Assuming the limit exists, use the method of Example 5 to determine the limit exactly. e. Repeat the preceding analysis for the expression \(\sqrt{p+\sqrt{p+\sqrt{p+\sqrt{p+\cdots}}}}\) where \(p > 0 .\) Make a table showing the approximate value of this expression for various values of \(p .\) Does the expression seem to have a limit for all positive values of \(p ?\)

A glimpse ahead to power series Use the Ratio Test to determine the values of \(x \geq 0\) for which each series converges. $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^{2 k}}{k^{2}}$$

Series of squares Prove that if \(\sum a_{k}\) is a convergent series of positive terms, then the series \(\Sigma a_{k}^{2}\) also converges.

Suppose an alternating series \(\sum(-1)^{k} a_{k}\) converges to \(S\) and the sum of the first \(n\) terms of the series is \(S_{n}\) Suppose also that the difference between the magnitudes of consecutive terms decreases with \(k\). It can be shown that for \(n \geq 1,\) $$\left|S-\left[S_{n}+\frac{(-1)^{n+1} a_{n+1}}{2}\right]\right| \leq \frac{1}{2}\left|a_{n+1}-a_{n+2}\right|$$ a. Interpret this inequality and explain why it gives a better approximation to \(S\) than simply using \(S_{n}\) to approximate \(S\). b. For the following series, determine how many terms of the series are needed to approximate its exact value with an error less than \(10^{-6}\) using both \(S_{n}\) and the method explained in part (a). (i) \(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k}}{k}\) (ii) \(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k}}{k \ln k}\) (iii) \(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k}}{\sqrt{k}}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.