Chapter 13: Problem 9
At what points of \(\mathbb{R}^{2}\) is a rational function of two variables continuous?
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 13: Problem 9
At what points of \(\mathbb{R}^{2}\) is a rational function of two variables continuous?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Use the method of your choice to ate the following limits. $$\lim _{(x, y) \rightarrow(-1,0)} \frac{x y e^{-y}}{x^{2}+y^{2}}$$
Use the method of your choice to ate the following limits. $$\lim _{(x, y) \rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{|x-y|}{|x+y|}$$
Absolute maximum and minimum values Find the absolute maximum and minimum values of the following functions over the given regions \(R\). Use Lagrange multipliers to check for extreme points on the boundary. $$f(x, y)=x^{2}-4 y^{2}+x y ; R=\left\\{(x, y): 4 x^{2}+9 y^{2} \leq 36\right\\}$$
Problems with two constraints Given a differentiable function \(w=f(x, y, z),\) the goal is to find its maximum and minimum values subject to the constraints \(g(x, y, z)=0\) and \(h(x, y, z)=0\) where \(g\) and \(h\) are also differentiable. a. Imagine a level surface of the function \(f\) and the constraint surfaces \(g(x, y, z)=0\) and \(h(x, y, z)=0 .\) Note that \(g\) and \(h\) intersect (in general) in a curve \(C\) on which maximum and minimum values of \(f\) must be found. Explain why \(\nabla g\) and \(\nabla h\) are orthogonal to their respective surfaces. b. Explain why \(\nabla f\) lies in the plane formed by \(\nabla g\) and \(\nabla h\) at a point of \(C\) where \(f\) has a maximum or minimum value. c. Explain why part (b) implies that \(\nabla f=\lambda \nabla g+\mu \nabla h\) at a point of \(C\) where \(f\) has a maximum or minimum value, where \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\) (the Lagrange multipliers) are real numbers. d. Conclude from part (c) that the equations that must be solved for maximum or minimum values of \(f\) subject to two constraints are \(\nabla f=\lambda \nabla g+\mu \nabla h, g(x, y, z)=0,\) and \(h(x, y, z)=0\)
Suppose \(n\) houses are located at the distinct points \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right),\left(x_{2}, y_{2}\right), \ldots,\left(x_{n}, y_{n}\right) .\) A power substation must be located at a point such that the sum of the squares of the distances between the houses and the substation is minimized. a. Find the optimal location of the substation in the case that \(n=3\) and the houses are located at \((0,0),(2,0),\) and (1,1) b. Find the optimal location of the substation in the case that \(n=3\) and the houses are located at distinct points \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right)\) \(\left(x_{2}, y_{2}\right),\) and \(\left(x_{3}, y_{3}\right)\) c. Find the optimal location of the substation in the general case of \(n\) houses located at distinct points \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right),\left(x_{2}, y_{2}\right), \ldots\) \(\left(x_{n}, y_{n}\right)\) d. You might argue that the locations found in parts (a), (b), and (c) are not optimal because they result from minimizing the sum of the squares of the distances, not the sum of the distances themselves. Use the locations in part (a) and write the function that gives the sum of the distances. Note that minimizing this function is much more difficult than in part (a). Then use a graphing utility to determine whether the optimal location is the same in the two cases. (Also see Exercise 75 about Steiner's problem.)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.