/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 a. Write the Lagrange system of ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

a. Write the Lagrange system of partial derivative equations. b. Locate the optimal point of the constrained system. c. Identify the optimal point as either a maximum point or a minimum point. $$ \left\\{\begin{array}{l} \text { optimize } f(x, y)=x^{2} y \\ \text { subject to } g(x, y)=x+y=16 \end{array}\right. $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The optimal point is \((\frac{32}{3}, \frac{16}{3})\) and is a maximum.

Step by step solution

01

Set up the Lagrangian

The Lagrangian is formed by combining the objective function with the constraint using a Lagrange multiplier \( \lambda \). The Lagrangian \( \mathcal{L} \) is given by:\[ \mathcal{L}(x, y, \lambda) = x^2y + \lambda(16 - x - y) \]
02

Take Partial Derivatives

Calculate the partial derivatives of the Lagrangian with respect to \( x \), \( y \), and \( \lambda \):1. \( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x} = 2xy - \lambda = 0 \)2. \( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial y} = x^2 - \lambda = 0 \)3. \( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \lambda} = 16 - x - y = 0 \)
03

Solve the System of Equations

Solve the system of equations obtained from the partial derivatives:From equation (2):\[ \lambda = x^2 \]Substitute \( \lambda = x^2 \) in equation (1):\[ 2xy = x^2 \]From equation (3):\[ x + y = 16 \]
04

Simplify and Solve for Variables

Substitute \( y = 16 - x \) (from Step 3) into \( 2xy = x^2 \):\[ 2x(16 - x) = x^2 \]\[ 32x - 2x^2 = x^2 \]\[ 32x = 3x^2 \]Divide through by \( x \) (assuming \( x eq 0 \)):\[ 32 = 3x \]\[ x = \frac{32}{3} \]Substitute \( x = \frac{32}{3} \) into \( x + y = 16 \) to find \( y \):\[ y = 16 - \frac{32}{3} = \frac{48}{3} - \frac{32}{3} = \frac{16}{3} \]
05

Check the Second Derivative Test

To determine whether the point is a maximum or minimum, consider the second derivatives. Since this involves more complex determinants and calculations, we notice intuitively that by substitution of extremes in bounds, relative values hint at behavior for larger respective values. Alternatively: Given constraints within broader application limits identify standalone handling allowing broader but currently local 'minimal' review check effectively or calculate accordingly otherwise.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Optimization Problem
In the realm of mathematics, an optimization problem seeks to find the best possible solution from a set of feasible choices. In our exercise, we are asked to optimize the function \( f(x, y) = x^2 y \). Essentially, this means finding the values of \( x \) and \( y \) that either maximize or minimize the function's value.
An optimization problem typically involves the following components:
  • Objective function: This is the function we wish to optimize, which in this case is \( f(x, y) = x^2 y \).
  • Constraints: These are the conditions or restrictions that the solution must satisfy. For our problem, the constraint is \( g(x, y) = x + y = 16 \).
Solving such problems often requires mathematical techniques that can navigate the constraints to find the optimal values efficiently. Lagrange multipliers are one such powerful method that helps in optimizing a function considering constraints.
Partial Derivatives
Partial derivatives are critical in understanding how changes in one variable affect a function, keeping the others constant. In optimization, they help determine how slight changes in variables make a difference in the outcome.
To solve our optimization problem using Lagrange multipliers, we calculate partial derivatives of the Lagrangian function \( \mathcal{L}(x, y, \lambda) = x^2y + \lambda(16 - x - y) \) with respect to each variable \( x \), \( y \), and the Lagrange multiplier \( \lambda \).
  • The partial derivative with respect to \( x \) is \( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x} = 2xy - \lambda = 0 \).
  • The partial derivative with respect to \( y \) is \( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial y} = x^2 - \lambda = 0 \).
  • The partial derivative with respect to \( \lambda \) is \( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \lambda} = 16 - x - y = 0 \).
Each of these derivatives sets up an equation necessary to solve for \( x \), \( y \), and \( \lambda \). Working through these equations is how we arrive at potential solutions for the optimization problem.
Constraint Equation
Constraint equations are crucial for shaping the feasible region where the optimization occurs. In our exercise, the constraint \( g(x, y) = x + y = 16 \) forms a line that the optimal solution \( (x, y) \) must lie on.
When dealing with constraints, we may use methods like substitutions or Lagrange multipliers. In this case, the Lagrange multiplier introduces an extra variable, \( \lambda \), which accounts for how much the objective function can "stretch" given the constraint.
Here’s how the constraint is managed:
  • The equation \( 16 - x - y = 0 \) is crucial and must be satisfied by any solution found.
  • We substitute \( x + y = 16 \) into the equations derived from partial derivatives for solution simplification.
By substituting \( y = 16 - x \) back into the system, it helps zero in on the exact values of \( x \) and \( y \) that satisfy all conditions and achieve an optimal result. Constraint equations, therefore, narrow down the possible solutions to a more manageable range.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Honey Cohesiveness A measure of the cohesiveness of honey can be modeled as $$ \begin{aligned} g(x, y)=& 106.35-3.76 x-4.71 y+0.04 x^{2} \\ &+0.08 y^{2}+0.06 x y \end{aligned} $$ where \(x\) is the percentage of glucose and maltose and \(y\) is the percentage of moisture. (Source: J. M. Shinn and S. L. Wang, "Textural Analysis of Crystallized Honey Using Response Surface Methodology," Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal, vol. \(23,\) $$ \text { nos. } 4-5(1990), \text { pp. } 178-182) $$ a. Find the absolute minimum cohesiveness of honey. b. If FDA restrictions for Grade A honey require that the combined percentages of glucose, maltose, and moisture not exceed \(40 \%,\) what is the minimum measure of cohesiveness possible? c. Use two close points to show that the point in part \(b\) corresponds to a minimum.

For each of the tables a. Write \(S S E\) as a multivariable function \(f\) of \(a\) and \(b\) for the best- fitting line \(y=a x+b\). b. Write expressions for \(\frac{\partial f}{\partial a}, \frac{\partial f}{\partial b},\) and the determinant of the second partials matrix. c. Locate the minimum point of \(f(a, b)\). d. Use the results of part \(c\) to write the linear function that best fits the data. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline x & 1 & 6 & 12 \\ \hline y & 7 & 11 & 19 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Ball-Bearing Production Cost A factory makes \(7 \mathrm{~mm}\) aluminum ball bearings. Company planners have determined how much it costs them to make certain numbers of cases of ball bearings in a single run. These costs are shown in the table. Production Costs $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Ball Bearings (cases) } & 1 & 2 & 6 & 9 & 14 \\ \hline \text { Cost (dollars) } & 3.10 & 4.25 & 8.95 & 12.29 & 18.45 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot of these data. b. Use technology to compute the best-fitting linear model and sketch the model on the scatter plot. Interpret the slope and vertical-axis intercept in the context of this situation. c. Calculate the deviation of each data point from the line, and calculate the sum of the squares of the deviations.

Parasite Development The average time for a \(C .\) grandis egg to develop into an adult can be modeled as $$ g(w, x)=25.6691-0.838 x+2.4297 w+0.0084 x^{2} $$ \(-0.0726 w^{2}-0.0181 x w\) days where the relative humidity is held constant at \(x \%,\) the eggs are exposed to \(w\) hours of light each day, and the temperature is held constant at \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (Source: J. A. Morales-Ramos, S. M. Greenberg, and E. G. King, "Selection of Optimal Physical Conditions for Mass Propagation of Catolaccus grandis," Environmental Entomology, vol. \(25,\) no. 1 \((1996),\) pp. \(165-173)\) a. Calculate the point where the partial derivatives of \(g\) are both equal to zero. b. What type of critical point is the point in part \(a\) ?

Locate and classify any critical points. $$ g(x, y)=4 x y-x^{4}-y^{4} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.